See also: IRC log
<dom_scribe> Minutes of meeting on testing widgets with web apps wg
Kai: would be helpful to get feedback from you guys at Opera, in particular Arve on this
<dom_scribe> Kai's message on widgets testing
<scribe> ACTION: Wilhelm to follow up on widgets testing with Kai [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action01]
Kai: current status: no real
issues, but needs some feedback
... I found some inconsistencies in the spec
... among other things in the relaxng
... I sent mails to the editor based on these
... found some weird usage of "its:dir", not sure that was
intended
Dom: its: comes from International tag set, a W3C spec
Kai: hopefully this will help the spec
<scribe> ACTION: Kai to forward his notes to the webapps list and to announce his early work on testing [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action02]
<hendry> http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa;a=tree;f=compression-level;
<hendry> http://git.webvm.net/?p=wgtqa;a=blob;f=compression-level/Makefile;
<hendry> `git clone git://git.webvm.net/wgtqa`
<scribe> ACTION: Wilhelm to look into opera's test suites for cookies [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/09/02-mwts-minutes.html#action04] [PENDING]
Dom: thanks for all your work as a co-chair of the group!
<scribe> ACTION: Carmelo to update the di guidelines based on the comments received so far [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/10/14-mwts-minutes.html#action04] [PENDING]
Carmelo: did some minor editing, but will get back to this soon
<hendry> http://dev.w3.org/2008/dev-ind-testing/guidelines.html
Dom: everyone should feel free to bring edits to the document, now that it is in CVS
<dom_scribe> Dom's message on WCT
Dom: does that sound good?
Wilhelm: sounds good indeed
Kai: yes
... not sure about detailing the technical aspects
... wouldn't it be effective to file bugs on the relevant
browsers?
Dom: I think doing a technical
report is a better way to get visibility in the W3C
community
... would also help to get a press release rolling
Wilhelm: I'm not sure how much
additional work needed for the technical report
... a press release would be great
Carmelo: +1
<scribe> ACTION: Dom to check about requirements for press release on web compatibility test [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action05]
<hendry> http://www.w3.org/Mobile/
Kai: would be good if it was easier to get to the web compatibility test
<hendry> from that site it's hard to find http://www.w3.org/2008/06/mobile-test/
<scribe> ACTION: Dom to make it easier to get to wct from /Mobile on W3C site [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/11/04-mwts-minutes.html#action06]
<hendry> and http://www.w3.org/2008/06/mobile-test/ is a monster URL. Ideally it should as short as possible ..
<hendry> or w3.mobi?
<hendry> len(xrl.us/bmqox) > w3.mobi :P
Kai: would be to raise the profile of building acid test-like things than building guidelines
dom: difficult to get people interested in building tests, unfortunately
<hendry> not in UK either btw
RESOLUTION: Wilhelm to chair call on Nov 11