<heycam> trackbot, start telcon
<trackbot> Date: 24 August 2008
<heycam> Meeting: SVG Working Group Nuremberg F2F Day 4
<ed> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/products/4
<heycam> ScribeNick: heycam
<scribe> Scribe: Cameron
http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/track/products/11
no, it's this: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Group/track/products/13
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/status/test_status12T.html
ED: i don't think we should work
on the actions that say to create a new test
... we can't get through all of the test suite actions before
we want to republish it
... one of the main things we need to do is approve tests we
think are finished
... anthony has the list of unapproved tests, we'll go through
them one by one
trackbot, close ACTION-2167
<trackbot> ACTION-2167 Ensure lacuna values are specifically mentioned for all default attribute values closed
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-204-t.svg
ED: we should just approve ones that are reviewed
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-220-t.svg
<ed> ED: this could be automated, by using javascript to do the spline/calcmode calculations and using getCurrentTime and the getPresentationTrait method(s) and comparing the two
<ed> ...would be much nicer because it could be quicker and not require someone looking at the test for a long time
<ed> ...let's leave this as unapproved for now
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-221-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-222-t
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-222-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-225-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-226-t.svg
<scribe> ACTION: Cameron to reinstate the qname type and make animation attributeName="" use that type in the schema and the spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2170 - Reinstate the qname type and make animation attributeName=\"\" use that type in the schema and the spec [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-08-31].
<anthony> approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-61-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-63-t.svg
unreviewed
trackbot, close ACTION-2126
<trackbot> ACTION-2126 Make the change proposed in Issue2016 closed
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/animate-elem-86-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/conf-reader-201-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/fonts-elem-201-t.svg
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/fonts.html#value-def-generic-family
not approved for now
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/fonts-glyph-202-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/interact-focus-208-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/interact-focus-209-t.svg
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/interact-pevents-01-t.svg
interact-focus-209-t approved
<ed> interact-pevents-01-t.svg should replace usage of on-attributes with xml-event handlers and also add pointer-events=boundingbox to the test
<ed> it's not a correct 1.2T test at the moment
<ed> ACTION: ed to fix the interact-pevents-01-t.svg test to replace usage of on-attributes with xml-event handlers and also add pointer-events=boundingbox to the test [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2171 - Fix the interact-pevents-01-t.svg test to replace usage of on-attributes with xml-event handlers and also add pointer-events=boundingbox to the test [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-08-31].
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/interact-pevents-03-t.svg
<ed> this is also using on-attributes
<ed> and letter-spacing
<ed> let's remove this test, and fix the interact-pevents-04-t.svg test because that's very similar
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/interact-pevents-04-t.svg
AG: can't fix the test to not use letter-spacing since <tspan>s can't have position attributes anyway in tiny
ED: we'll take out this test
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/linking-a-04-t.svg
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/linking-a-201-t.svg
<ed> linking-a-04-t.svg will be removed, replaced by linking-a-202-t.svg (same but removing the view element, and the middle subtest)
<ed> ACTION: ed to review linking-a-202-t.svg [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2172 - Review linking-a-202-t.svg [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-08-31].
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/linking-a-05-t.svg
<ed> ACTION: ed to review linking-a-203-t.svg [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2173 - Review linking-a-203-t.svg [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-08-31].
<ed> linking-a-05-t.svg will be removed, replaced by linking-a-203-t.svg (same but removing the view element, and the middle subtest)
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/linking-a-201-t.svg
<anthony> approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/linking-uri-01-t.svg
<ed> ED: testing view elements specifically, not applicable to tiny - let's remove it
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/linking-uri-02-t.svg
<ed> ED: same as linking-uri-01-t, remove
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/media-audio-214-t.svg
<ed> approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/paint-stroke-203-t.svg
<ed> not approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/paint-stroke-206-t.svg
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/script-handler-201-t.svg
<anthony> paint-stroke-206.svg not approved
<ed> script-handler-201-t.svg not approved
ED: i'm not happy with approving
this test, where it tests functions/this-values etc.
... i'm not sure this aligns properly with XML Events and other
users of XML Events (xhtml, xhtml+voice)
... we should remove our requirements from the spec on this,
too
... and leave it until Core
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/script.html#HandlerElement
RESOLUTION: remove the spec text about binding 'this' in <handler>s, and check what to say about the event handler being like a Function object
<ed> ACTION: ed to remove the 'this' keyword binding in the 'handler' element, and investigate if the execution of the handler content is actually like a Function object or if the contents are put in the global scope [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2174 - Remove the 'this' keyword binding in the 'handler' element, and investigate if the execution of the handler content is actually like a Function object or if the contents are put in the global scope [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-08-31].
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/script-listener-203-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/script-listener-204-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-class-201-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-common-201-t-debug.svg
<ed> ED: remove that, we have struct-common-201-t.svg (but fix it since it has an error with duplicate xml:id attributes)
<ed> AG: I committed the fix for the non-debug version
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-common-201-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-cond-204-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-cond-209-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-cond-210-t.svg
approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-discard-203-t.svg
<ed> ACTION: ed to figure out what's bork-bork-borken with the right red rect in struct-discard-203-t.svg [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action06]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2175 - Figure out what's bork-bork-borken with the right red rect in struct-discard-203-t.svg [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-08-31].
<ed> ED: not approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-svg-204-t.svg
<ed> ED: was "in error" before
<ed> CM: changed that to unsupported, so the test should be changed
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-svg-205-t.svg
<ed> ED: remove this test
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-06-t.svg
<ed> changed to be using green rects, and remove style attributes
ED: we'll remove struct-use-06 and replace it with a fixed up one in the 2** series
AG: found that struct-use-05 was not a tiny test for various reasons, and is now fixed up and called struct-use-207-t
<ed> struct-use-06-t is now struct-use-206-t
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-07-t.svg
<ed> remove style attributes, remove widht and height on the use element
<ed> remove test and replace it with a fixedup struct-use-208-t
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-208-t.svg
<ed> approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-08-t.svg
<ed> uses width and height on the use element, lacks pass criteria
<ed> remove struct-use-08-t.svg, replace it with struct-use-209-t.svg
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-209-t.svg
<ed> the resource still uses width and height on 'use'
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-209-t.svg
<ed> sorry, http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/images/struct-use-209-t-cycles.svg
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/styling-inherit-02-t.svg
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-209-t.svg was approved
<anthony> styling-inherit-02 was already approved
<anthony> but wasn't accepted
<anthony> watermark was commented out as well
<anthony> so we should just change it to accepted
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-align-203-t.svg
<ed> trying to test tspans with different text-anchor values, but that's only useful when there's x and y on tspan
<ed> so let's remove the test, since it's already covered by text-align-01-t.svg anyway
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-area-202-t.svg
<ed> pass criteria?
<anthony> tests that http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-area-208-t.svg
<ed> AE will work on adding pass criteria to text-area-202-t, let's come back to it later
<ed> same as text-area-202, needs clear pass criteria
<ed> AE: uses percentage font-sizes
<ed> ...actually that was changed, so it's not anymore
<ed> approved after the pass criteria were clarified
trackbot, close ACTION-2160
<trackbot> ACTION-2160 Make the publication script be able to generate a single page version closed
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-area-211-t.svg
<ed> AE: finished the pass criteria on text-area-202-t.svg, marking as accepted
<ed> ED: text-area-211 also needs clear pass criteria
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-area-212-t.svg
<ed> AE: will do pass criteria for 211 and 212
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-area-223-t.svg
<ed> trackbot, close ACTION-2169
<trackbot> ACTION-2169 Take out current element traversal interface and a reference to the Element Traversal spec closed
<ed> 223 is going to be unapproved still, let's revisit it for core (ISSUE-2041)
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-fonts-203-t.svg
<ed> leave it for now, needs to have the svgfont to be correct
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-area-211-t.svg
<ed> AE: [reads new pass criteria]
<ed> ok, let's approve it
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/text-intro-06-t.svg
<ed> approved
<anthony> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-conform-201-t.svg
<ed> approved
<anthony> scribe: anthony
<scribe> scribeNick: anthony
DS: We've communicated Ikivo and
they've not shown strong support
... in the connection interface
... Given that there are alternatives with XHR and possible
with HTML connection interface
... in the future
ED: And GetURL and PostURL
DS: And given the review comments
we got
... even though it's implemented we think it's best to drop the
connection interface
ED: It's not implemented widely
DS: But it's still implemented
AE: We've got an implementation
but we understand for logistical reasons
... that we are ok with it being taken out
ED: You could get away with an
implementation with raising exceptions
... it'd be silly
AE: We did talk about it being
optional
... but we'd still have full QA for it
DS: And we don't want to have optional features
RESOLUTION: We will drop the Connection Interface
CM: Binary to String and String
to Binary are useless with out connection
... too bad I wrote those tests
ED: We can drop, Connection
Event
... and bits in the table in the interaction chapter
... should we remove global exception?
... would be good if we can decide what exception to use for
denied error in timer
CM: I think we can get rid of that exception all together
RESOLUTION: We will drop Binary to String and String to Binary, Create Connection, Global Exception and the Exception on Create Timer
AE: JSR doesn't reference Global
ED: What about when we go to Core?
CM: If it's Object then you'd to cast it
ED: We could name what we have to something else
CM: Given that they don't
implement it in Java
... I don't know if it's a binary incompatible change, not sure
what the rules are
ED: If we named Global to an empty Window
DS: We can say plug Window in here
CM: So maybe we can try that
DS: Would it be a big change?
ED: Well no
... there's not much there
CM: I think it makes it more palatable so we can hook into the interface later
ED: I'm wondering if we can get away with an abstract view
CM: We could subset abstract
view
... and take nothing out from it
ED: This looks like a big action
<shepazu> Zakim: remind me in 3 hours to oastarstarl
AE: That means we'd have to
reference another spec
... I guess I don't understand what you're going to replace it
with
<ed> http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-2-Views/views.html
<ed> it's a Recommendation
RESOLUTION: We will replace Global with Abstract View
<scribe> ACTION: Cameron to replace Global with Abstract View and add the reference [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action07]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2176 - Replace Global with Abstract View and add the reference [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-08-31].
<scribe> ACTION: Erik to Binary to Drop the connection interface [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action08]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2177 - Binary to Drop the connection interface [on Erik Dahlström - due 2008-08-31].
DS: If it turns out that there is
more interest in connection than we thought
... we could always make a module
ED: Yes that should be something outside of the SVG WG
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-dom-204-t.svg
DS: Yes there is the Network spec in Web Apps
ED: The last one is using Parse XML
<heycam> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-SVG12-20041027/painting.html#static-property
DS: Looks like it wouldn't take much time to put in
ED: I don't think true and false are good values
AG: I don't think they are good either
CM: What about a different
property name?
... buffer?
AE: Cache?
... we liked Static
... because it tells you what it's doing
... What about values Enable, Disable, Auto?
ED: We have shape rendering,
image rendering
... can we add this to one of the already existing
properties
DS: What about "rendering"
... with "static", "dynamic" and "auto"
... what about cached rendering?
AE: buffer-intent? cache-intent?
CM: I wouldn't mind
buffered-rendering
... you're hinting for the speed
RESOLUTION: We will add buffered-rendering with values dynamic, static and auto
<scribe> ACTION: Emmons to Add buffered-rendering to the specification and create a test [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action09]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2178 - Add buffered-rendering to the specification and create a test [on Andrew Emmons - due 2008-08-31].
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-dom-204-t.svg
<ed> approved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-dom-205-t.svg
CM: I'd like to move timer from
the Global module to the SVG module
... the only thing in the Global Module is the timer
interface
... I'd prefer to put it in SVG Module because it's the only
way to create a timer is the SVG Global interface
... which is also in the SVG Module
... I think we have less of a right to create things in the DOM
Module
RESOLUTION: We will move timer from Global to the SVG Module and remove the Global Module
<scribe> ACTION: Cameron to Move timer from Global to the SVG Module and remove the Global Module [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html#action10]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-2179 - Move timer from Global to the SVG Module and remove the Global Module [on Cameron McCormack - due 2008-08-31].
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-dom-205-t.svg
<ed> leave as unapproved for now
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-dom-208-t.svg
<ed> opera needs null instead of empty strings there I think
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-dom-209-t.svg
<ed> approved
<ed> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-dom-208-t.svg left as unapproved for now
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-event-205-t.svg
CM: I'll change the past criteria
<ed> approved after those changes
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-event-208-t.svg
<ed> approved after changing the text on the slide (circle should stay black, it shouldn't turn blue)
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-event-210-t.svg
approved after changing the test slightly and adding a visual description
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-node-203-t.svg
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-node-203-t.svg
left as unapproved for now
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-203-t.svg
left as unapproved for now
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-206-t.svg
approved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-207-t.svg
left as unapproved for now
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-212-t.svg
left as unapproved for now
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-213-t.svg
modifying test by adding an animation
approved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-214-t.svg
left as unapproved for now
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-215-t.svg
<ed> AE: there are similar tests, so leave this one as unapproved for now
<ed> ...let's remove udom-svg-214-t and 215-t because we have overlapping tests that are approved already
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-220-t.svg
approved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-221-t.svg
<ed> leave as unapproved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-222-t.svg
<ed> leave as unapproved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-223-t.svg
<ed> leave as unapproved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svg-230-t.svg
<ed> invalid, must check all forms of the color
<ed> leave as unapproved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svgmatrix-205-t.svg
<ed> approved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-svgmatrix-206-t.svg
<ed> approved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-traitaccess-201-t.svg
<ed> approved
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/udom-traitaccess-202-t.svg
<ed> pass criteria could be better
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/inking-a-05-t.svg/linking-a-05-t.svg/ Succeeded: s/with html/with XML Events and other users of XML Events (xhtml, xhtml+voice)/ Succeeded: s/pass criteria/pass criteria to text-area-202-t/ Succeeded: s/nothing/nothing out/ Found ScribeNick: heycam Found Scribe: Cameron Found Scribe: anthony Inferring ScribeNick: anthony Found ScribeNick: anthony Scribes: Cameron, anthony ScribeNicks: heycam, anthony WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: AE AG CM DS aemmons anthony anthony_ ed heycam scribeNick shepazu trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 24 Aug 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/08/24-svg-minutes.html People with action items: cameron ed emmons erik WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]