See also: IRC log
<MSM> johnarwe, an automotive problem has come up that I have to take care of right now; I'll be late for the call. Hopefully not too late, but late.
<scribe> Scribe: James Lynn
<scribe> scribenick: Jim
<pratul> I will be representing Microsoft until Kumar shows up
<johnarwe> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008May/att-0078/20080515-sml-minutes.html
No objections or updates noted.
Resolution: Minutes approved.
register whether attending in person or by phone.
The CG is gravitating toward the week that we selected (Oct 27-31).
<pratul> Switching back to co-chair role now that Kumar is here
Pratul: No ETA on his item.
Kumar: No update.
Close this bug as this was due to a technical problem on the server.
Sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.1 definitions do not match.
<scribe> ACTION: Julia to propose a change. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-sml-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-186 - Propose a change. [on Julia McCarthy - due 2008-05-29].
Actioin 186 = Propose a text change for Bug 5710
<johnarwe> first sentence of 4.3 probably supplies the info missing per bug 5710
Action 186 = Propose a text change for Bug 5710
Resolution: Mark as editorial, does not need review.
Kumar requested that we defer this to the next meeting to give him time to research whether the "global" restriction makes sense.
<scribe> ACTION: Kumar to research issue in Bug 5712. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-sml-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-187 - Research issue in Bug 5712. [on Kumar Pandit - due 2008-05-29].
Resolution: Mark as needsAgreement.
Resolution: Mark as editorial, does not need agreement.
Need to wait one more week.
Need to wait one more week.
Need to wait one more week.
Need to wait one more week.
Resolution: Mark as FIXED
<johnarwe> first step: any objs to diff in comment 1?
<johnarwe> second step will be: assess agreement on proposal in comment 2
WG agrees on the changes shown in the diff file in sections 4.1.3 and 4.1.4.
WG agrees to the changes in Comment #2.
Resolution: Mark as editorial, no need for review.
Resolution: Mark as FIXED. Open a new bug to address "processor" per comment #5
Resolution: Mark as editorial, no review needed.
Proposal to have schemaComplete='false'
Resolution: Mark as editorial, does not need review.
Proposal is to mov schemaComplete to modelType and update spec as per bug description.
Resolution: Mark as editorial, needs no review.
Resolution: Mark as editorial per proposal in description, needs no review.
Resolution: Mark as needs agreement.
<scribe> ACTION: Julia to discuss Bug 5680 with Valentina. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-sml-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-188 - Discuss Bug 5680 with Valentina. [on Julia McCarthy - due 2008-05-29].
<johnarwe> this comes up I think because of the first sentence in the bug - we already talk about fragment-only uris
<johnarwe> MSM suggests that, to the degree we need to state anything, we note that it is a consequence of other normative documents, not a normative stmt promulgated by our specs
<johnarwe> the other sticky point about what I'll call this "transitive closure" issue of dependencies, is that if you (as we did with sml) want to say that it supports _either_ schema 1.0 or 1.1, you must choose between non-overlapping RFC numbers (because newer ones superseded older)
<pratul> John - we should do the ext comments bugs first
<pratul> due to the 2 week mandatory wait period
<scribe> ACTION: Kumar to draft a proposal for Bug 5707. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-sml-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-189 - Draft a proposal for Bug 5707. [on Kumar Pandit - due 2008-05-29].
Resolution: Mark as needsAgreement.
<MSM> the lady or the tiger?
<johnarwe> time check - have to wrap soon
Resolution: Remains needsAgreement. Pick up discussion on next call.
<MSM> test cases for lax fallback
<scribe> ACTION: MSM to draft test case for lax falback. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-sml-minutes.html#action05]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-190 - Draft test case for lax falback. [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-05-29].
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: James Lynn Found ScribeNick: Jim WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Kumar MSM Sandy ginny johnarwe julia pratul scribenick trackbot-ng You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: Replacing previous Regrets list. (Old list: Kirk) Use 'Regrets+ ... ' if you meant to add people without replacing the list, such as: <dbooth> Regrets+ Jordan Regrets: Jordan Got date from IRC log name: 22 May 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/05/22-sml-minutes.html People with action items: julia kumar msm WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]