RDF DAWG Weekly

last meeting record

APPROVED (as true record of last meeting)

next meeting: 10 April, scribe: LeeF, regrets: jeen

ACTION: AndyS to incorporate and explain the notion of active graph in section 8 and/or wherever else appropriate [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action01]

ACTION: Eric to incorporate text for REDUCED into rq25, including text noting that REDUCED does not play nicely with counting [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action02]

ACTION: ericP schedule teleconf for Friday [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action03]

ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action04]

ACTION: LeeF or EliasT to reply to Bjoern regarding (not) POSTing application/sparql-query documents [CONTINUED] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action05]

ACTION: LeeF to remember that the wee, lost filter tests should be put [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action06]

last call comments

LeeF on comment handling

[LeeF summarizes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0188]

LeeF: we have comments from Olivier

test suite

the tests in question

LeeF: AndyS made suggestions, and someone will respond to commentor

LeeF, any problems with any of these tests?

scribe: happy with reports that implementations pass tests, or that folks believe to be correct by inspection

PROPOSED approve tests in - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/bnode-coreference/

(1 test)

- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/bound/

(1 test)

- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/optional/

(3 tests)

- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/expr-builtin/

(17 tests)

2nd: ericP, jeen

RESOLVED, no objections or abstaintaintions

ACTION: jeen to mark these 22 approved tests as approved [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action07]

ericp's syntax test

ACTION: ericP to add tests along the lines of http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JanMar/0079.html to data-r2/syntax-sparql* and send mail so we can approve them next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action08]

What needs to be done on the test suite?

tests readme

(bottom) LeeF on comments on test suites

LeeF: tests reeadme needs updates with manifest vocabulary changes

LeeF: does not mention that results can be in .rdf, .src, ttl

ACTION: ericP, jeen, or LeeF to update http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/README with info on possible results format and on changes to manifest and test vocabularies [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action09]

overview page

LeeF: we have an overview page for tests, how is it produced?

ericP: uses 3store

ACTION: ericP to get in touch with SteveH re: setting up an environment to generate an Overview page for tests in data-r2 a la http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/ [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action10]

ericP: was installed on a machine in tokyo which was recently scavenged for parts

LeeF: least costly path to restore/reimplement?

ericP: probably restore, with SteveH's help

LeeF: anyone who has time should check old tests and propose to move them to data2

ACTION: ericP to commit batch updates to out-of-date tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action11]

ACTION: jeen to go through and identify out-of-date tests that shouldn't be migrated to data-r2 (after ericP commits batch updates to tests) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/03-dawg-minutes#action12]

Jeremy Carroll and language tags

<patH> Has everyone seen Jeremy Carroll's email to the RDF and OWL lists re. language tags? It looks relevant to us.

<patH> see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2007AprJun/0000

<SimonR> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4646.txt

matching of language tags

patH: JJC says "please use 4646 instead of 3066"

ericP: we use 4647

SPARQL ref to 4647

AndyS: did ericP check for salient diffs in 4647?

ericP: i *think* so

status and CR

LeeF: we need to show "wide review"
... don't know if we can show "wide review" based on earlier comments

<Souri> I am just curious, what is the max allowed length of a language-tag?

<EliasT> Thanks DanC

<EliasT> Gracias DanC

LeeF: big shout out to DanC for all his work

patH: we need to send him sincerest condolances for his new role

ADJOURNED at 15:13Z