ISSUE-119
no-interaction certs
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- wsc-xit
- Raised by:
- Thomas Roessler
- Opened on:
- 2007-10-11
- Description:
- We currently have placeholder text for "non-interaction" certificates.
- What's the normative reference for the OID here?
- Is "no-interaction" the right terminology? - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-364 on Thomas Roessler to remove non-interaction certs while merging Stephen's rewrite - due 2008-02-06, closed- Related emails:
- Meeting record: WSC WG weekly 2007-12-19 (from tlr@w3.org on 2008-01-11)
- Re: ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (from johnath@mozilla.com on 2008-01-07)
- Re: ISSUE-167: Should Section 5.3.1 specify normative details for a theoretical technology? (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2008-01-07)
- Draft minutes: WSC WG weekly 2007-12-19 (from tlr@w3.org on 2007-12-19)
- RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-19 (from dan.schutzer@fstc.org on 2007-12-19)
- RE: Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-19 (from wdoyle@mitre.org on 2007-12-19)
- Agenda: WSC WG distributed meeting, Wednesday, 2007-12-19 (from Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com on 2007-12-18)
- ISSUE-119: no-interaction certs [Techniques] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2007-10-11)
Related notes:
Action-348 responds to this (and other issues)
Mary Ellen Zurko, 14 Dec 2007, 15:22:04Display change log