List of comments on “Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) Ontology” (dated 12 May 2014)

Status: allopen proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other Type: allsubstantive editorial typo question general comment undefined

Quick access to LC-2990

Comment LC-2990

Commenter: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com> (archived message)

Context: Document as a whole

Status:

open proposal pending resolved_yes resolved_no resolved_partial other assigned to Nobody Abdel-Rahman, Hassan Ai, Lu Arnab, Alapan Becker, Stefan Beynet, Yannick Birmingham, James Cave, Francis Chaney, Dennis CHOUKRI, Khalid Clark, Sheena Colin, Jean-Noel Compton, Dave Delgado, Jaime Desmontils, Emmanuel Earley, Jim Fornara, Nicoletta Gauss II, Ray Großer, Katharina Guth-Orlowski, Susanne Guth-Orlowski, Susanne Hickson, William holborn, timothy Howard, Roger Hück, Benjamin Iannella, Renato Isaac, Antoine Jafari, Mohammad Kapoor, Amit Kasten, Andreas Kirrane, Sabrina Knygar, Ya Lewis, David Lewis, Lucinda Llorente, Silvia McRoberts, Mo Mihindukulasooriya, Nandana Myles, Stuart Öberg, Jonas Pähler, Daniel Paschke, Adrian Perego, Andrea Polleres, Axel Quinn, Brendan Rodríguez-Doncel, Víctor Schumacher, Greg Sedlik, Jeff Steyskal, Simon Suarez-Figueroa, Mari Carmen Tournié, Stéphane ukadike, kemi Villata, Serena Vowles, Graham Wenning, Rigo White, Ben Wilkinson, Simon

Type: substantive editorial typo question general comment undefined

Comment:

These editorial comments are primarily aimed at aligning the ODRL Ontology spec with the Common Vocabulary spec.

1 - Update title to "ODRL Version 2.1 Ontology"

2 - The "Offer", "Agreement", and "Offer and next Policy" scenario examples need to update the pay duty to compensate and use a constraint for the payAmount (not an asset)

3 - The "Multiple assets" scenario example needs to define x:collection as a o:relation sub-property

4 - The "event" property also defines a specific value ("playUsage") - need to add this

5 - All of the Actions need their definitions to be updated (copy/paste from the Common Vocab document) as we have updated all the definitions (from "grantUse" right up to "watermark")

6 - "aggregate", "annotate", and "anonymize" have Broader Term "use"

7 - deprecate "appendTo", "lease", "lend", "preview", "secondaryUse", and "writeTo"

8 - deprecate "copy" and recommend to use "reproduce"

9 - "display" is not equivalent to "execute" (and vice-versa)

10 - deprecate "export" and recommend to use "transform"

11 - deprecate "license" and recommend to use "grantUse"

12 - "modify" is not equivalent to "derive" (and vice-versa)

13 - deprecate "pay" and recommend to use "compensate"

14 - "play" is not equivalent to "present" - "present" is a Broader Term

15 - "present" - move "play" from equivalent to narrower term

16 - add "transfer" and "use” actions (these need to be explicitly defined in the Common Vocab as well)


Cheers...
Renato Iannella
Semantic Identity
http://semanticidentity.com
Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206

Related issues: (space separated ids)

WG Notes:

Proposed Resolution: Accepted and spec updated.

(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)