W3C

Edit comment LC-664 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-1437 Next: LC-799

Comment LC-664
:
Commenter: Alan Sparkes <slipsy@gmail.com> on behalf of none

or
Resolution status:

Part of Item:
Comment Type: GE
Comment (including rationale for proposed change):

I am greatly disturbed my the disparaging comments i have read here:http://www.sitepoint.com/blogs/2006/05/26/wcag-20-is-broken-leave-your-comments-now/
A quick scan of the document or quotes from it certainly adds evidence to the idea that there is really a corporate law suit protection agenda going on. In the UK we have a campaign body called plain english who award government and organisations for their clear use of language. My quick scan shows a woefully unclear use of language compared to version 1.0.

Please listen up to the more considered opinions you will be hearing / have heard.

Proposed Change:

revert to 1.0!
582
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)


Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 664.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:41:46 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org