Edit comment LC-1306 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-637 Next: LC-748

Comment LC-1306: Comment Shortname:; Commenter: Jonathan Worent <jworent@yahoo.com>; Message-id:; Section of the document concerned:

or; Refinement of the section concerned:; Status:
assigned to; Type:; Resolution status:
Response drafted Resolution implemented Reply sent to commenter; Response status:
No response from Commenter yet Commenter approved disposition Commenter objected to disposition
Commenter's response (URI):; Comment:
Part of Item:
Comment Type: substantive
Comment (including rationale for proposed change):

I know this has been brought up before. I am in agreement that validity needs to be a requirement at level 2.

Proposed Change:

Put \"Create documents that validate to published formal grammars\" in as a level 2 requirement.; Related issues: (space separated ids); WG Notes: [TEAMC] Discussed in the 29 March 2007 telecon: Resolution: close as proposed http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2007/03/29-wai-wcag-minutes.html {not accept}; Resolution: The working group looked at this topic carefully over an extended period of time and concluded that requiring strict adherence to all aspects of specifications does not necessarily result in an increase in accessibility. For example, it is possible to create invalid pages that present no accessibility barriers. It is also possible in certain situations to enhance accessibility through the use of markup that is not part of the specification. The working group must work within its charter and only include things that directly affected accessibility. Some aspects of "use technologies according to specification" and validity do relate to accessibility. However, others do not. So requiring validity would take us beyond our charter. We do recommend it though and it is our #1 technique listed for conforming to SC 4.1.1.; (Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)