W3C

Edit comment LC-1026 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-950 Next: LC-1256

Comment LC-1026
:
Commenter: Gian Sampson-Wild <gian@tkh.com.au>

or
Resolution status:

Conformance schema - The documents say that all success criteria are essential to people with disabilities (see WCAG 2.0 under 'Conformance' - "The WCAG WG believes that all SC ..."), however by using the WCAG1 labelling system this change is not obvious. In addition to this, the Conformance section specifically states a hierarchical nature to the to the SC in WCAG2 by defining Level 1 as "achiev(ing) a minimum level of accessibility", Level 2 as "achiev(ing) an enhanced level of accessibility" and Level 3 as "achiev(ing) additional accessibility enhancements". The Conformance section is contradictory, because in the subsequent paragraph it says "Each checkpoint in WCAG 1.0 was assigned a "priority" according to its impact on accessibility... the system of checkpoints and priorities used in WCAG 1 has been replaced...". By using the subjective terms Priority 1 / A in WCAG2, the WG is implying that there is a hierarchical nature to the SC. People are used to the WCAG1 labelling system and will assume that by following all Level A SC that they are creating an accessible web site.

Proposed Change:

Merge Level 1 and Level 2 SC into one group called "Mandatory". Rename Level 3 to "Advisory" or "Optional"
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)


Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 1026.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:41:09 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org