Edit comment LC-2922 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-2942 Next: LC-2766

Comment LC-2922
Commenter: Glenda Sims <Glenda Sims <glenda.sims@deque.com>>

Resolution status:

I need clarification on *2.3.1 Info & Relationships*. Can you tell me if
my interpretation is correct:

I think it is possible to pass WCAG 2.0 SC 1.3.1 without using ARIA
landmarks. As much as I love ARIA landmarks...I do not think they are
required in WCAG 2.0.

I always recommend them, but I don't currently have my team call a WCAG 2.0
violation on SC 1.3.1 if ARIA landmarks are missing.

Thanks in advance for your insight (as you might guess, the Deque
Accessibility Experts are not in agreement in how to interpret this).
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)

Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 2922.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:40:15 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org