This document:Public document·View comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Other specs in this tool Accessibility Guidelines Working Group's Issue tracker
Quick access to LC-2912 LC-2916 LC-2917 LC-2918 LC-2919 LC-2920 LC-2939 LC-2950 LC-2951 LC-2952 LC-2953 LC-2954 LC-2955 LC-2956 LC-2957 LC-2958 LC-2959 LC-2960 LC-2961 LC-2963
Previous: LC-2963 Next: LC-2916
I have a question regarding some situations listed under "Sufficient Techniques for 1.1.1 - Non-text Content" -- http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/#text-equiv, namely, Situation A: If a short description can serve (supported by G94 etc.)... and Situation B: If a short description cannot serve (supported by G95 etc.)... Question: Can someone decide on the basis of the length of text string if a short description can 'serve' or 'cannot serve' the same purpose as the non-text content? For example, wouldn't it be more helpful to know to use Situation A when the short description is less than 200 char etc.? A case in point - H37 is listed under both Situations A and B, which means that although not suitable, a 1200 char length alt attribute on a chart (Situation B) can be implemented to claim conformance. Basically, how short should be a short description?