W3C

How Compliance with
Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 Helps with
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0

W3C Working Draft 06 May 2008

Table of Contents

Introduction

Incomplete draft: This document is an editor's copy that has no official standing and is incomplete. Particularly, the section WCAG 2.0 and MWBP Together is only an outline; WCAG 1.0 to MWBP is only partly filled out. It is subject to major changes and is therefore not intended for implementation. It is provided for review and feedback only. Please send feedback to public-bpwg-comments@w3.org (archive).

This page is part of a suite of related documents. Please refer to the “How to Use These Documents” section for more information.

It describes how some Mobile Web Best Practices (MWBPs) help with achieving compliance with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG). For content that already complies with MWBP, it outlines what may need to be done to comply with all of WCAG.

As described in this section, many Mobile Web BPs have the added benefit of partial or complete compliance with certain WCAG success criteria. However, the accessibility guidelines are often more detailed or describe a different aspect of the same concept. It should not be assumed that following any BP will ensure accessibility. To ensure accessibility it is important to always consult the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines.

Summary of work required to make content that meets MWBP also meet WCAG 2.0

Compliance with the MWBP helps go some way towards achieving compliance with some WCAG 2.0 success criteria. This section provides a summary of these SC. For those SC not listed, there is no synergy between the recommendations.

Nothing: content already complies with these SCs. The list is provided for completeness.

Something: some more effort of some kind or a check, will be necessary to ensure compliance with these SCs. Refer to the sections below on each success criterion for an explanation of how and in what way the BPs partially or possibly help to meet the SC.

For all other success criteria, the MWBP do not ensure compliance and it will be necessary to [do the work]. (Comment: these are listed temporarily at the end of the document under SCs with no coverage.)

Addressing WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria

1.3.1 Info and Relationships

Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text. (Level A)

Refer to 1.3.1, Info and Relationships in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence

When the sequence in which content is presented affects its meaning, a correct reading sequence can be programmatically determined. (Level A)

Refer to 1.3.2, Meaningful Sequence in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

The visual presentation of text and images of text has a contrast ratio of at least 5:1, except for... (Level AA)

Refer to 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced)

The visual presentation of text and images of text has a contrast ratio of at least 7:1, except for...: (Level AAA)

Refer to 1.4.6 Contrast (Enhanced) in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

1.4.8 Visual Presentation

Refer to 1.4.8 Visual Presentation in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

2.1.1 Keyboard

Refer to 2.1.1 Keyboard, in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception)

Refer to 2.1.3 Keyboard (No Exception), in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

Refer to 2.4.2 Page Titled, in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

Refer to 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

Headings and labels describe topic or purpose. (Level AA)

Refer to 2.4.6 Labels Descriptive in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

Refer to 2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only) in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

3.1.5 Reading Level

Refer to 3.1.5 Reading Level in summary list.

3.2.1 On Focus

Refer to 3.2.1 On Focus in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

3.2.2 On Input

Refer to 3.2.2 On Input in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

3.2.3 Consistent Navigation

Refer to 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation in summary list.

3.2.5 Change on Request

Refer to 3.2.5 Change on Request in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

3.3.2 Labels or Instructions

Refer to 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

4.1.2 Name, Role, Value

Refer to 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value in summary list.

Back to list of WCAG 2.0 checkpoints

SCs with no coverage

This list is provided as a completeness check during editing and will be removed in the final document, as discussed by EOWG.