ACTION-1051: Find who can provide an answer to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2006Apr/0000.: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-forms/2006AprJun/att-0219/2006May31.html#ACTION3

Dear All


Would it be helpful...?

Am I right to post a respond here at public-xformsusers@w3.org related with
Action 1051 sent by Steven Pemberton:

https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/1051

of which there is a link to


https://www.w3.org/History/

...?

I finded a related page (which was about https://www.w3.org/History/) I did
not see at glance at the page mentioned before which was

A summary of the history of the WWW project:

https://www.w3.org/History/19921103-hypertext/hypertext/WWW/History.html

(I ever sent the information on the address to public-webhistory@w3.org on
March 25 2019.)

(I sent this message to https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xformsusers/2019Apr/0039.html for this was about the 1st time I gave a response to the programme "ACTION".)


Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

THis is an action from a previous incarnation of the Forms WG.

Since the section is non-normative, and only a "hint", we don't think it is imperative to say more, but briefly:

* "Bicameral": it is not up to us to define which scripts are bicameral.
* "mutually exclusive": it is not up to us to define which character properties are exclusive.
* IRIs: are used for character properties, not scripts, and is quite specific: "This specification does not define any URIs for use as tokens, but allows others to define such URIs for extensibility. This may become necessary for devices with input modes that cannot be covered by the tokens provided here. The URI should dereference to a human-readable description of the input mode associated with the use of the URI as a token. This description should describe the input mode indicated by this token, and whether and how this token modifies other tokens or is modified by other tokens."
* inputmode is declared as xs:string, which is allowed to be empty.