W3C | TAG | Previous: 6-7 Feb face-to-face | Next: 24 Jan 2003 teleconf

Agenda for 17 Feb 2003 TAG teleconference

Nearby: Teleconference details · issues list · www-tag archive

Note: The Chair does not expect the agenda to change after close of business (Boston time) Thursday of this week.

1. Administrative (20min)

1. Confirm Chair (NW) and Scribe (IJ).
2. Accept 6-7 Feb face-to-face minutes?
3. Accept this agenda?
4. Approve revised Deep Linking finding? (TAG-only)
5. Next meeting: 24 Feb? Talk about presentation at TechPlenary
6. Proposed to cancel 3 March meeting

1.1 Meeting planning

• Completed Action PC 2003/02/06: Talk to meeting planners about May 2003 TAG schedule (noting that it overlaps with W3C track so there may be absences). (Done)
• Completed Action IJ 2003/02/06: Talk to Nov AC meeting planners to see if 14-15 ok for TAG meeting. We can meet any time according to the Keio Team, and stay at the guest house.
• Completed Action PC 2003/02/06: Report TAG's tech plenary plan to tech plenary planning committee (Done).

1.2 Mailing list management

• Action SW: Send draft mailing list policy to tag@w3.org. (See preliminary announcement)

1.3 Other stuff

• Action IJ 2003/02/06: Fix issues list to show that actions/pending are orthogonal to decisions. IJ is working with PLH on this.
• Completed Action IJ 2003/02/06: Explain how TAG participants can edit the source of the arch document. (Done)

2. Technical (70min)

2.1 New issues?

• Site metadata hook? See email from TBL

2.2 Issues

• deepLinking-25
  • Action TB 2003/02/06: Send URI equiv draft finding to uri@w3.org.
  • Completed Action IJ 2003/02/06: Publish Deep Linking finding as accepted finding. See revised Deep Linking finding. Approve this draft?
• namespaceDocument-8
  • Completed Action PC, TB 2003/01/13: Write up a Working Draft that recommends a data format for namespace docs (not compulsory) and that such a document should follow the Rec track process. (Done) The initial content of the document should be taken from the RDDL challenge proposals; they are isomorphic in technical content. Please include drawbacks in the draft. See NW summary
• xmlFunctions-34
  • Action TBL 2003/02/06: State the issue with a reference to XML Core work. Deadline 17 Feb.
• mixedNamespaceMeaning-13
  • Completed Action SW 2003/02/06: Report to www-tag on disposition of this issue. (Done)

2.3 Other issues

The TAG is likely to review action items associated with these issues.

• rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6
  • Action DC 2003/02/06: Propose TAG response to XML Schema desideratum (RQ-23). See input from Jonathan Marsh (forwarded by Paul Cotton).
• uriMediaType-9
  • Action DC 2003/02/06: Start discussion on discuss@apps.ietf.org, but not urgent
• RDFinXHTML-35
  • Action DC 2003/02/06: Write up a crisp articulation of issue RDFINHTML-35. [DC says - don't expect results before May 2003 meeting]
• HTTPSubstrate-16
  • Action RF 2003/02/06: Write a response to IESG asking whether the Web services example in the SOAP 1.2 primer is intended to be excluded from RFC 3205
  • See message from Larry Masinter w.r.t. Web services.
• errorHandling-20
  • Action CL 2003/02/06: Write a draft finding on the topic of (1) early/late detection of errors (2) late/early binding (3) robustness (4) definition of errors (5) recovery once error has been signaled. Deadline first week of March.
• contentTypeOverride-24
  • Completed Action DC 2003/02/06: Send an email to the Voice WG that third para of 2.2.2 CR of Speech Recognition Grammar Spec is wrong regarding override of media type. (Done)
• contentPresentation-26
  • Action CL 2003/02/06: Create a draft finding in this space. Deadline 3 March.
• IRIEverywhere-27
  • Action CL 2003/01/27: Send piece that CL/MD/IJ wrote to www-tag.
• binaryXML-30
  • Completed action CL 2003/01/27: Send piece on binary XML to www-tag. (Done)
• metadataInURI-31
  • Action SW 2003/02/06: Draft finding for this one.
• URIEquivalence-15
  • Completed Action DC 2003/02/06: Publish slides on URI Equivalence. (Done)
  • Completed Action TBL 2003/02/06: Write up a proposal for a new issue regarding generic metadata hooks (related to robots.txt). Email from TBL
• fragmentInXML-28 : Use of fragment identifiers in XML.
  1. Connection to content negotiation?
  2. Connection to opacity of URIs?

2.4 Findings in progress, architecture document

See also: findings.

1. 6 Feb 2003 Editor's Draft of Arch Doc:
   1. Next TR page draft?
   2. Completed Action CL 2002/09/25: Redraft section 3 based on resolutions of 18 Nov 2002 ftf meeting. Done in 6 Feb 2003 Editor's Draft
   3. Action DC 2003/02/06: Attempt a redrafting of 1st para under 2.2.4