ISSUE-23: Make tableOwner optional

tableOwner optional

State:

CLOSED

Product:

R2RML

Raised by:

David McNeil

Opened on:

2011-02-15

Description:

Currently tableOwner is required if the tableName property is used. Change this so that tableOwner is optional.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-03-17)
Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (from me@alexdeleon.name on 2011-03-16)
Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (from rscanlon@revelytix.com on 2011-03-15)
Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-03-15)
Re: R2RML: publishing the second draft (from rscanlon@revelytix.com on 2011-03-15)
Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] (from souripriya.das@oracle.com on 2011-02-15)
Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-02-15)
Re: ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] (from juanfederico@gmail.com on 2011-02-15)
Re: Mandatory tableOwner property (from dmcneil@revelytix.com on 2011-02-15)
ISSUE-23 (tableOwner optional): Make tableOwner optional [Direct Mapping] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-02-15)

Resolved on the Feb. 15 to make tableOwner optional.
Souri has ACTION-103 to implement this resolution.

Ashok Malhotra, 15 Feb 2011, 17:31:39