ISSUE-10: Hash vs Slash

hash-vs-slash

Hash vs Slash

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Direct Mapping

Raised by:

Juan Sequeda

Opened on:

2011-01-21

Description:

The direct graph may be offered as Linked Open Data, raising the issue of distinguishing row identifiers from the information resources which describe them. This edition of this document presumes hash identifiers, allowing a GET on a row identifier to retrieve a small resource (i.e. not all rows from the same table) and distinguish between the retrieved resource People/ID=7 and the row People/ID=7#_. The "slash" alternative would offer a direct graph with identifiers like People/ID=7 but would demand the server respond to GET /People/ID=7 with a 303 redirect to some other resource.

Consequently, there is the use of "#_". There is no consensus of the need of an underscore at the end.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from bvillazon@fi.upm.es on 2011-03-15)
2. Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from juanfederico@gmail.com on 2011-03-15)
3. Re: RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com on 2011-03-15)
4. RDB2RDF WG agenda for 2011-03-15 meeting 1600 UTC (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-03-15)
5. Minutes of 2011-03-01 telecon (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-03-01)
6. ISSUE-10 (hash-vs-slash): Hash vs Slash [Direct Mapping] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-01-21)

Related notes:

Display change log