Re: Open Issues against UC&R

OK, I'll go ahead. Steve Speicher already verified that there's no impact on the LDP Core FPWD, as he spotted my error months back and included these issues anyway.

Thanks, Steve.

On 5 Dec 2012, at 17:42, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> Please, go ahead. I consider this a clerical error and don't see the need to be overly procedural about fixing this. 
> Thanks.
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group
> 
> 
> Steve Battle <sysemia.steve.battle@gmail.com> wrote on 12/04/2012 11:34:59 AM:
> 
> > From: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk 
> > To: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>, Arnaud Le Hors/
> > Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS, 
> > Date: 12/04/2012 11:35 AM 
> > Subject: Open Issues against UC&R 
> > Sent by: Steve Battle <sysemia.steve.battle@gmail.com> 
> > 
> > We currently have seven open issues against the LDP UC&R <https://
> > www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/products/3>.
> > Four of these are really issues about the Linked Data Platform Core;
> > I know because I raised them.
> > 
> > <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/16>
> > <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/17>
> > <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/18>
> > <https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/21>
> > 
> > These issues were provoked by analysis of the use-cases, hence my 
> > mistake, but the subject is the LDP Core. Blame my unfamiliarity 
> > with the tool and the unclear semantics of 'Product'.
> > I don't recall this (mis)assignment being in any way critical to 
> > their acceptance as 'open' issues, so am I allowed procedurally to 
> > change the product now?
> > We plan to annotate the UC&R FPWD with any open issues relevant to 
> > it, as is the Linked Data Platform FPWD. So this product assignment 
> > is important.
> > 
> > If anyone has any technical or procedural objections please let me 
> > know. I'll hold off from making any such change until after the call
> > next Monday.
> > 
> > Note that the other three issues are properly issues against UC&R, 
> > and will be considered as such.
> > 
> > <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/30>
> > <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/40>
> > <http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/41>
> > 
> > Thanks, Steve.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Steve Battle
> > 
> > -- 
> > Steve Battle
> > Semantic Engineer
> > 
> > E-mail: steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk
> > Web: www.sysemia.com
> > 
> > Sysemia Limited
> > The Innovation Centre, Bristol&  Bath Science Park, Dirac Crescent, 
> > Emerson's Green, Bristol BS16 7FR
> > Registered in England and Wales. Company Number: 7555456
> > 
> > DISCLAIMER
> > 
> > Information contained in this e-mail is intended for the use of the 
> > addressee only, and is confidential and may also be privileged. If 
> > you receive this message in error, please advise us immediately. If 
> > you are not the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of 
> > distribution, copying or use of this communication or the 
> > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. 
> > Attachments to this e-mail may contain software viruses which may 
> > damage your systems. Sysemia Ltd have taken reasonable steps to 
> > minimise this risk, but we advise that any attachments are virus 
> > checked before they are opened.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >