ISSUE-18: container membership and robust pagination

container membership

container membership and robust pagination

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Linked Data Platform Spec

Raised by:

Steve Battle

Opened on:

2012-10-05

Description:

Issues relating to use-case UC-BPC1: List resources within a container

http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Use_Cases_And_Requirements#UC-BPC1:_List_resources_within_a_container

* Should there be a guaranteed way to get the full container membership without pagination. ie. Should GET on <containerURL> ''ever'' be redirected to the paginated <containerURL>?firstpage ?

* The current approach to paging is not robust to deletions and insertions of container members. Insertions/deletions will have the side effect of moving page boundaries. This could be detected by qualifying the request with 'If-match'.

* Should the number of resources per page be an explicit property of the container?

* Why do we have different query syntaxes for accessing the first and subsequent pages (e.g. why not p=1): <URI>?firstpage, <URI>?p=2, ... ?

* Is it best to use 'p' or something more descriptive like 'page'?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Proposal to close ISSUE-69, as is (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-06)
2. Re: LDP Issues list maintenance (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2013-05-06)
3. ldp-ISSUE-69: Query syntaxes for accessing the first and subsequent pages (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-05-06)
4. ldp-ISSUE-68: Number of resources per page (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-05-06)
5. ldp-ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-05-06)
6. ldp-ISSUE-66: Robust pagination [Linked Data Platform core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-05-06)
7. Re: ldp-ISSUE-59 (recursive-delete): Reconsider usage of Aggregate/Composite construct to get predictable container delete behavior [Linked Data Platform core] (from ashok.malhotra@oracle.com on 2013-04-05)
8. Re: Open Issues against UC&R (from sspeiche@gmail.com on 2012-12-05)
9. Re: Open Issues against UC&R (from steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk on 2012-12-05)
10. Re: Open Issues against UC&R (from lehors@us.ibm.com on 2012-12-05)
11. Open Issues against UC&R (from steve.battle@sysemia.co.uk on 2012-12-04)
12. Re: ldp-ISSUE-18 (container membership): container membership and robust pagination [Use Cases and Requirements] (from Erik.Wilde@emc.com on 2012-10-08)
13. Re: ldp-ISSUE-18 (container membership): container membership and robust pagination [Use Cases and Requirements] (from johnarwe@us.ibm.com on 2012-10-08)
14. Re: ldp-ISSUE-18 (container membership): container membership and robust pagination [Use Cases and Requirements] (from andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com on 2012-10-08)
15. Re: ldp-ISSUE-18 (container membership): container membership and robust pagination [Use Cases and Requirements] (from Erik.Wilde@emc.com on 2012-10-05)
16. ldp-ISSUE-18 (container membership): container membership and robust pagination [Use Cases and Requirements] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-10-05)

Related notes:

Display change log