- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 12:57:11 -0400
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- CC: www-tag@w3.org
Jonathan: I've added your goals and suggested readings to the agenda at [1]. Please check them. Thank you. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/06/06-agenda.html#persistence On 6/3/2011 10:02 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote: > Links for persistence session (obviously not required reading) > > - geo: URI scheme > http://geouri.org/about/ > http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5870 > - ORCID > http://www.orcid.org/ > - Datacite > http://www.datacite.org/whatdowedo > - DOI Foundation > http://www.doi.org/handbook_2000/governance.html > - duri: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-08 > - WebCite > http://webcitation.org/ > - P2P DNS > http://p2pdns.baywords.com/2010/11/30/hello-world/#comments > - Namecoin > https://github.com/vinced/namecoin/blob/master/FAQ.md > - W3C URI persistence policy > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence.html > - Vocabulary Hosting: A Modest Proposal > http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin/homepage/papers > > Discussion topics for session > > - Goal: links that are both actionable and "persistent" (trustworthy) > - Use cases: (1) permanent record (text), (2) archival linked data > - TAG can't take initiative but can inform and advise > - The issue is trust, not technique. DOIs are trusted by the affected > communities. > - How vulnerable are DOIs? > - How vulnerable are W3C URIs? Thought experiment: Should W3C buy > some DOIs? > - What sort of miracle might bring about actionable > trusted-to-be-persistent URIs? Is this a thought experiment or real prospect? > > Jonathan > >
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2011 16:57:38 UTC