- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:51:51 +0000
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@talis.com>
- Cc: "Paul Gearon" <gearon@ieee.org>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 14 Jan 2010, at 14:18, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 12/01/2010 5:38 PM, Axel Polleres wrote: > > > ISSUE-27: Already the strawpoll. No real agreement on We didn't pass > a new resolution, but ISSUE-27 is closed now, considering this earlier > resolution. > > Strawpoll is at: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-01-12#line0272 > > (aside: I'm finding it hard to the tie resolution to issue in the issue > tracker. Is there a way to make trackbot tie the resolution to the issue?) good question... sandro? ivan? > > > PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-25 with the understanding that this is *allowed* by the definition of INSERT in the current SPARQL1.1/Update WD. > > Agreed - the resolution should mention GRAPH which is the mechanism > whereby it happens. > > > PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-38 with the understanding that this is covered by the resolution of ISSUE-27 already > > Agreed. > > Andy >
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 09:52:30 UTC