- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:10:52 -0400
- To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
* Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-03-23 15:38-0700] > I reviewed the Turtle 2013 doc and the test suite hanging out in > mercurial a few weeks ago at > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/ > I'm still not clear if these define conformance; I asked about this > in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Feb/0026.html In May 2012, the RDF WG discussed conformance and opted to follow W3C practice of having the spec alone define conformance. <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-16#line0147> (You can track the evolution of the conformance section on <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/log/dad56881f954/rdf-turtle/index.html>. Look for the commit comment "Remove current conformance text".) If you are satisfied with the resolution of Turtle tests defining conformance, please reply with [RESOLVED] in the subject. -- -ericP
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 15:11:21 UTC