RE: ISSUE (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF] PLEASE NOTE!!

> When doing so, please remember to copy both lists and ensure that it says
> i18n-ISSUE- [.....] 3 in the email (and preferably the subject line).

Sorry that should have read ii18n-ISSUE-  followed by a 2.  SOmething odd seems to have created a third issue. I'll need to look into that.

RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/




> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida
> Sent: 09 December 2010 12:25
> To: 'Internationalization Core Working Group WG'
> Subject: RE: ISSUE-2 (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF] PLEASE NOTE!!
> 
> This is a trial comment.  You will shortly see another copy of it sent to this list
> and the font list.  I'm just sending the one for now as an exploration.
> 
> Please don't respond to this note or the original message below.  If you do
> want to contribute thoughts, please reply to the email I sent to the www-font
> list.
> 
> When doing so, please remember to copy both lists and ensure that it says
> i18n-ISSUE-3 in the email (and preferably the subject line).
> 
> Thanks,
> RI
> 
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> Internationalization Lead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://rishida.net/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-core-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Internationalization Core Working Group
> Issue
> > Tracker
> > Sent: 09 December 2010 12:10
> > To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> > Subject: ISSUE-2 (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF]
> >
> >
> > ISSUE-2 (r12a): Why not using xml:lang? [WOFF]
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/2
> >
> > Raised by: Richard Ishida
> > On product: WOFF
> >
> > 6. Extended Metadata Block
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/WOFF/#Metadata
> >
> > Substantive(?)
> > WG approved?  No
> >
> > "The text elements MAY be given a lang attribute."
> >
> > Why are you inventing your own lang attribute, rather than using xml:lang
> for
> > this?
> >
> >
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 12:29:44 UTC