ISSUE-22: examples and more explanation about Participation and engagement
examples-P&E
examples and more explanation about Participation and engagement
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Participation and Engagement
- Raised by:
- Luigi Selmi
- Opened on:
- 2009-04-20
- Description:
- I think participation and C2G lack some explanations. Participation can be viewed in very different ways. People can interact directly with the government or between them in order to build a consensus around a position that can be voted and proposed to the government. The first way can lead to a form of populism, the second way is what is generally viewed as a better and democratic kind of participation. Participation on the Web means doing public debates on line. On a debate people should be able to raise issues, write positions or arguments, post links to articles, blog post, videos. All these data must be interoperable...
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] eGov IG call, 6 May 2009 (from josema@w3.org on 2009-05-06)
- [minutes] eGov IG call, 29 April 2009 (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-29)
- Re: more examples for Participation and Engagement (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-23)
- RE: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates (from selmi_luigi@hotmail.com on 2009-04-22)
- RE: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates (from oscar.azanon@vitruviosistemas.com on 2009-04-22)
- more examples for Participation and Engagement (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-20)
- Re: applications and vocabularies enabling public debates (from josema@w3.org on 2009-04-20)
- ISSUE-22 (examples-P&E): examples and more explanation about Participation and engagement [Participation and Engagement] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2009-04-20)
Related notes:
added wording from Daniel to P&E How section that shows more example scenarios, can be closed
José Manuel Alonso, 7 May 2009, 08:18:17Display change log