Copyrightc 2001 VeriSign Inc, Microsoft Corporation, webMethods Inc.
This document specifies protocols for distributing and registering public keys, suitable for use in conjunction with the proposed standard for XML Signature [XML-SIG] developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and an anticipated companion standard for XML encryption. The XML Key Management Specification (XKMS) comprises two parts -- the XML Key Information Service Specification (X-KISS) and the XML Key Registration Service Specification (X-KRSS).
This document is a submission to the World Wide Web Consortium (see Submission Request, W3C Staff Comment) as a suggestion for message packaging for the W3C XML Activity on XML Protocols. For a full list of all acknowledged Submissions, please see Acknowledged Submissions to W3C.
Comments are welcome to the authors but you may also share your views on the XML Trust Forum list: xml-trust@yahoogroups.com (see archive).
This document is a NOTE made available by the W3C for discussion only. Publication of this Note by W3C indicates no endorsement by W3C or the W3C Team, or any W3C Members. W3C has had no editorial control over the preparation of this Note. This document is a work in progress and may be updated, replaced, or rendered obsolete by other documents at any time.
A list of current W3C technical documents can be found at the Technical Reports page.
1.4 Key Information Service Specification
1.5 Key Registration Service Specification
1.7 Structure of this document
2 Key Information Service Protocol Overview
2.1 Tier 0: <ds:RetrievalMethod> Processing
2.2.1 Example: Document Signature
2.2.2 Example: Data Encryption
2.3.1 Example: Document Signature
2.4 Validity of the Service Response
3 Key Information Service Message Set
3.3.6 <KeyBinding>, <Query>, <Prototype>
4 Key Registration Service Protocol Overview
4.1 Linkage to an Underlying PKI
4.2.1 Example: Registration of Client-Generated Key Pair
4.2.2 Example: Registration of Service-Generated Key Pair
5 Key Registration Service Message Set
6 Cryptographic Algorithm Specific Parameters
6.1 Use of Limited-Use Shared Secret Data
6.2 Registration of User-Generated RSA or DSA Keys
6.3 Registration of Service-Generated RSA Keys
6.3.1 Encoding of RSA Private Key Parameters
6.3.2 Encryption of Private Key Parameters
7.4 Security of Limited Use Shared Secret
Appendix A Web Service Contract
A.1 Schemas and Web Service Definition
Appendix B Sample Protocol Exchanges
B.4 Registration of Client Generated Key Pair
B.5 Registration of server generated key
Figure 1: Substitution of the <ds:KeyInfo> element as a message is
passed amongst processors
Figure 2: Tier 0 Protocol allows a <ds:Keyinfo> element to reference
external data
Figure 3: Tier 1 Protocol Provides Name
Resolution Service
Figure 4: Tier2 Protocol Provides Key Validation
Service
Figure 5: Registration of a KeyBinding
This document specifies protocols for distributing and registering public keys, suitable for use in conjunction with the proposed standard for XML Signature [XML-SIG] developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and an anticipated companion standard for XML encryption. The XML Key Management Specification (XKMS) comprises two parts -- the XML Key Information Service Specification (X-KISS) and the XML Key Registration Service Specification (X-KRSS).
The X-KISS specification defines a protocol for a Trust service that resolves public key information contained in XML-SIGelements. The X-KISS protocol allows a client of such a service to delegate part or all of the tasks required to process <ds:KeyInfo> elements. A key objective of the protocol design is to minimize the complexity of application implementations by allowing them to become clients and thereby to be shielded from the complexity and syntax of the underlying PKI used to establish trust relationships. The underlying PKI may be based upon a different specification such as X.509/PKIX, SPKI or PGP.
The X-KRSS specification defines a protocol for a web service that accepts registration of public key information. Once registered, the public key may be used in conjunction with other web services including X-KISS.
Both protocols are defined in terms of structures expressed in the XML Schema Language, protocols employing the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) v1.1 [SOAP] and relationships among messages defined by the Web Services Definition Language v1.0 [WSDL]. Expression of XKMS in other compatible object encoding schemes is also possible.
This document specifies protocols for distributing and registering public keys, suitable for use in conjunction with the proposed standard for XML Signatures [XML-SIG] developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and an anticipated companion standard for XML encryption. The XML Key Management Specification (XKMS) comprises two parts -- the XML Key Information Service Specification (X-KISS) and the XML Key Registration Service Specification (X-KRSS).
These protocols do not require any particular underlying public key infrastructure (such as X.509) but are designed to be compatible with such infrastructures.
This document comprises the following service specifications:
Design criteria include:
To meet these design criteria, the specifications in this family are layered, separating the protocol semantics from the implementation syntax.
The message syntax presented in this document is based on XML and is designed to allow use of the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) and the Web Service Definition Language (WSDL) specifications. From these, it is possible to generate APIs in common programming languages such as the C family of programming languages.
It is also possible to express the messages in syntax other than XML, over protocols other than SOAP and through a definition language other than WSDL, though such expression is outside the scope of this specification except to note that SOAP and WSDL are proposals currently or potentially considered by the World Wide Web Consortium XML Protocol Activity. If XML and SOAP are not adopted by this Activity, we anticipate that the protocol would be expressible in any specification recommended by the Activity.
The following terms are used within this document with the particular meaning indicated below:
Service
An application that provides computational or informational resources on request. A service may be provided by several physical servers operating as a unit.Web service
A service that is accessible by means of messages sent using standard web protocols, notations and naming conventionsClient
An application that makes requests of a service. The concept of 'client' is relative to a service request; an application may have the role of client for some requests and service for others.
For clarity, some examples of XML are not complete documents and namespace declarations may be omitted from XML fragments. In this document, certain namespace prefixes represent certain namespaces.
All XMKMS protocol elements are defined using XML schema [XML-Schema1][XML-Schema2]. For clarity unqualified elements in schema definitions are in the XML schema namespace:
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema"
References to XML Key Management Specification schema defined herein use the prefix "xkms" and are in the namespace:
xmlns:xkms="http://www.xkms.org/schema/xkms-2001-01-20"
This namespace is also used for unqualified elements in message protocol examples.
The XKMS schema specification uses the elements already defined in the XML Signature namespace. The "XML Signature namespace" is represented by the prefix ds and is declared as:
xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"
The "XML Signature schema" is defined in [XML-SIG-XSD] and the <ds:KeyInfo> element (and all of its contents) are defined in [XML-SIG §4.4].
X-KISS allows a client to delegate part or all of the tasks required to process XML Signature <ds:KeyInfo> elements to a Trust service. A key objective of the protocol design is to minimize the complexity of applications using XML Signature. By becoming a client of the trust service, the application is relieved of the complexity and syntax of the underlying PKI used to establish trust relationships, which may be based upon a different specification such as X.509/PKIX, SPKI or PGP.
By design, the XML Signature Specification does not mandate use of a particular trust policy. The signer of a document is not required to include any key information but may include a <ds:KeyInfo> element that specifies the key itself, a key name, X.509 certificate, a PGP Key Identifier etc. Alternatively, a link may be provided to a location where the full <ds:KeyInfo> information may be found.
The information provided by the signer may therefore be insufficient by itself to perform cryptographic verification and decide whether to trust the signing key, or the information may not be in a format the client can use. For example:
In the case of an encryption operation:
X-KRSS describes a protocol for registration of public key information. A client of a conforming service may request that the Registration Service bind information to a public key. The information bound may include a name, an identifier or extended attributes defined by the implementation.
The key pair to which the information is bound may be generated in advance by the client or, to support key recovery, may be generated on request by the service. The Registration protocol may also be used for subsequent recovery of a private key
The protocol provides for authentication of the applicant and, in the case that the key pair is generated by the client, Proof of Possession (POP) of the private key. A means of communicating the private key to the client is provided in the case that the private key is generated by the Registration Service.
This document specifies means of registering RSA and DSA keys and a framework for extending the protocol to support other cryptographic algorithms such as Diffie-Helleman and Elliptic Curve variants.
Different applications require different levels of PKI service. To support this need a tiered implementation model is defined in which applications may select the precise level of processing that meets their requirements.
Tier 0 Processing of the <ds:RetrievalMethod> element of the <ds:KeyInfo> element is by the application. Processing is as defined by the XML Signature specification [XML-SIG §4.4.3] and without assistance of a trust service.
Tier 1 Processing of the <ds:KeyInfo> element by the application is delegated to a service. The service returns a <ds:KeyInfo> element that describes a public key meeting the criteria specified by the client application. Validation of the <ds:KeyInfo> is performed by the client.
Tier
2 Validation Service
As in tier 1, but in addition, the service reports further information
concerning the data specified in a <ds:KeyInfo> block.
Additional tiers could be defined in separate documents
Tier
3 Assertion Service
Establishment and management of long term trust relationships.
Tier
4 Assertion Status Service
Management of the status of assertions.
In each case, the trust service shields the client application from the complexities of the underlying PKI such as:
The remainder of this document describes the XML Key Information Service Specification and XML Key Registration Service Specification.
Section
2: X-KISS Protocol Overview.
The functional behavior of the X-KISS protocol is described.
Section
3: X-KISS Message Set.
The semantics of the X-KISS protocol messages are defined.
Section
4: X-KRSS Protocol Overview.
The functional behavior of the X-KRSS protocol is described.
Section
5: X-KRSS Message Set.
The semantics of the X-KRSS protocol messages is defined.
Section
6: Cryptographic Algorithm support
Data formats to support use of the cryptographic algorithms RSA and DSA are
defined.
In the XML Signature Specification, a signer may optionally include information about his public signing key ("<ds:KeyInfo>") within the signature block. This key information is designed to allow the signer to communicate "hints" to a verifier about which public key to select.
Another important property of <ds:KeyInfo> is that it may or may not be cryptographically bound to the signature itself. This allows the <ds:KeyInfo> to be substituted or supplemented without "breaking" the digital signature.
For example Alice signs a document and sends it to Bob with a <ds:KeyInfo> element that specifies only the signing Key Data. On receiving the message Bob retrieves additional information required to validate the signature and adds this information into the <ds:KeyInfo> element when he passes the document on to Carol (see Figure 1below).

Figure 1: Substitution of the <ds:KeyInfo> element as a message is passed amongst processors
A <ds:KeyInfo> element may include a <ds:RetrievalMethod> element which is a means to convey information available from a remote location. The <ds:RetrievalMethod> element is a feature of and is defined by the XML Signature Specification. Since it is the most basic means of resolving a <ds:KeyInfo> element it is described here as the 'Tier 0' Key Information service.
For example, the signer of a document may wish to refer verifiers to a chain of X.509 certificates without having to attach them. <ds:RetrievalMethod> consists of a location which in this case, would refer to a location on the web from which the certificate chain may be retrieved, a method, and a type.
The XML Signature Specification defines the <ds:Keyinfo> <ds:RetrievalMethod> as follows:
A
RetrievalMethod element
within Keyinfo is used to
convey a reference to Keyinfo information
that is stored at another location. For example, several signatures in a
document might use a key verified by an X.509v3 certificate chain appearing
once in the document or remotely outside the document; each signature's
Keyinfo can reference
this chain using a single ds:RetrievalMethod
element instead of including the entire chain with a sequence of
X509Certificate
elements.
RetrievalMethod uses the same syntax and dereferencing behavior as Reference's URI (section 4.3.3.1 [of [XML-SIG]]) and The Reference Processing Model (section 4.3.3.2 [of [XML-SIG]]) except that there is no DigestMethod or DigestValue child elements and presence of the URI is mandatory. Note, if the result of dereferencing and transforming the specified URI is a node set, then it may need to be to be canonicalized. All of the KeyInfo types defined by this specification (section 4.4 [of [XML-SIG]]) represent octets, consequently the Signature application is expected to attempt to canonicalize the nodeset via the The Reference Processing Model (section 4.3.3.2 [of [XML-SIG]])
Schema Definition:
<element name="RetrievalMethod"> <complexType> <sequence> <element ref="ds:Transforms" minOccurs="0"/> </sequence> <attribute name="URI" type="uriReference"/> <attribute name="Type" type="uriReference" use="optional"/> </complexType> </element>
In the following example, the signer indicates a web-resident directory service (www.PkeyDir.test) where they have published information about their public key.
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:RetrievalMethod URI="http://www.PKeyDir.test/CheckKey"
Type="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#X509Certificate"/>
</ds:KeyInfo>
The relying party retrieves the additional Key Information by resolving the specified URL (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Tier 0 Protocol allows a <ds:Keyinfo> element to reference external data
The Tier 1 Locate service resolves a <ds:Keyinfo> element but does NOT REQUIRE the service to make an assertion concerning the validity of the binding between the data in the <ds:Keyinfo> element.
The Trust service MAY resolve the <ds:Keyinfo> element using local data or MAY relay request to other servers. For example the Trust service might resolve a <ds:RetrievalMethod> element (Figure 3) or act as a gateway to an underlying PKI based on a non-XML syntax.

Figure 3: Tier 1 Protocol Provides Name Resolution Service
Both the request and/or the response MAY be signed, to both authenticate the sender and protect the integrity of the data being transmitted, using an XML Signature.
The client receives a signed XML document. The <ds:Keyinfo> element specifies a <ds:RetrievalMethod> for an X.509 certificate that contains the public key. The client sends the <ds:Keyinfo> element to the location service requesting that the <KeyName> and <KeyValue> elements be returned.
Request:
<Locate>
<Query>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:RetrievalMethod
URI="http://www.PKeyDir.test/Certificates/01293122"
Type="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#X509Data"/>
</ds:KeyInfo>
</Query>
<Respond>
<string>KeyName</string>
<string>KeyValue</string>
</Respond>
</Locate>
The location service resolves the <ds:RetrievalMethod>, obtaining an X.509v3 certificate. The certificate is parsed to obtain the public key value that is returned to the client.
The location service DOES NOT report the revocation status or the trustworthiness of the certificate. The <KeyName> returned is obtained from the certificate.
Response:
<LocateResult>
<Result>Success</Result>
<Answer>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyName>O=XMLTrustCernter.org OU="Crypto"
CN="Alice"</ds:KeyName>
<ds:KeyValue>...</ds:KeyValue>
</ds:KeyInfo>
</Answer>
</LocateResult>
(For readability, the contents of the <KeyValue>element are omitted from the example above. Full examples are shown in appendices. )
The client is attempting to send an encrypted XML document and requires the public key encryption parameters of the recipient.
Request:
<Locate>
<Query>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyName>Alice Cryptographer</ds:KeyName>
</ds:KeyInfo>
</Query>
<Respond>
<string>KeyName</string>
<string>KeyValue</string>
</Respond>
</Locate>
Response:
<LocateResult>
<Result>Success</Result>
<Answer>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyName>Alice Cryptographer</ds:KeyName>
<ds:KeyValue>...</ds:KeyValue>
</ds:KeyInfo>
</Answer>
</LocateResult>
The Tier 2 Validate Service allows all that tier one does, and in addition, the client may obtain an assertion specifying the status of the binding between the public key and other data, for example a name or a set of extended attributes. Furthermore the service represents that the status of each of the data elements returned is valid and that all are bound to the same public key. The client sends to the trust service a prototype containing some or all of the elements for which the status of the trust binding is required. If the information in the prototype is incomplete, the trust service MAY obtain additional data required from an underlying PKI Service. Once the validity of the Key Binding has been determined the Trust service returns the status result to the client (Figure 4).

Figure 4: Tier2 Protocol Provides Key Validation Service
The client of the example in section 2.2.1 has verified the document signature. The client now needs to determine whether the binding between the name and the public key is both trustworthy and valid.
Request:
<Validate>
<Query>
<Status>Valid</Status>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyName>...</ds:KeyName>
<ds:KeyValue>...</ds:KeyValue>
</ds:KeyInfo>
</Query>
<Respond>
<string>KeyName</string>
<string>KeyValue</string>
</Respond>
</Validate>
Response:
<ValidateResult>
<Result>Success</Result>
<Answer>
<KeyBinding>
<Status>Valid</Status>
<KeyID>http://www.xmltrustcenter.org/assert/20010120-39</KeyID>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyName>...</ds:KeyName>
<ds:KeyValue>...</ds:KeyValue>
</ds:KeyInfo>
<ValidityInterval>
<NotBefore>2000-09-20T12:00:00</NotBefore>
<NotAfter>2000-10-20T12:00:00</NotAfter>
</ValidityInterval>
</KeyBinding>
</Answer>
</ValidateResult>
Clients SHOULD ensure that the response from the service to a Locate or Validate operation is valid, meaning that the following criteria are met.
Authenticity: That the response message was issued by a trusted Trust service
Integrity: That the response message has not been modified
Correspondence: The response from the Trust service corresponds to the request that was made to the client.
The appropriate means of validating the service response is dependent on the application. It is not necessary for the requests to be authenticated with a digital signature if the client supports some other secure means of communicating with the Trust service.
The authenticity, integrity and correspondence of the response SHOULD be ensured using one or more of the following methods:
In the case that signed response messages are employed, the means by which the client determines that the signing key is trustworthy is outside the scope of this specification. Possible mechanisms include:
The protocol consists of pairs of messages, with an application sending a request message to a trust service and the service responding with another message.
The content and format of messages are defined using the W3C XML Schema specification [XML-Schema1][XML-Schema2]. All values are encoded as element data. The XKMS specification itself uses only a restricted set of types, but element values may potentially use any type definable within XML Schemas. XKMS is compatible with the object serialization format defined within SOAP (see Appendix A ) but does not use some aspects of that format. In particular, sequences of elements are expressed as sequences of elements without reference to the SOAP array encoding.
The following common data elements are used in the message set:
The <ds:Keyinfo> element is defined in the XML Signature Specification schema and that specification governs its format and use.
The <ds:Keyinfo> element communicates data using both attributes and elements. Arbitrary extension elements are permitted.
The enumerated type ResultCode is used to return result codes from each interface. It has the following possible values:
Success
The operation succeeded.
NoMatch
No match was found for the search prototype provided.
Incomplete
Only part of the information requested could be provided.
Failure
The operation failed for unspecified reasons.
Refused
The operation was refused.
Pending
The operation was queued for future processing.
ResultCode is defined by the following schema:
<simpleType name="ResultCode">
<restriction base="string">
<enumeration value="Success"/>
<enumeration value="NoMatch"/>
<enumeration value="Incomplete"/>
<enumeration value="Failure"/>
<enumeration value="Refused"/>
<enumeration value="Pending"/>
</restriction>
</simpleType>
The enumerated type AssertionStatus is used to report the status of an assertion such as a key binding. The following values are defined:
Valid
The binding is definitively valid.
Invalid
The binding is definitively invalid.
Indeterminate
The status of the assertion cannot be determined.
The AssertionStatus type is defined by the following schema:
<simpleType name="AssertionStatus" base="string">
<enumeration value="Valid"/>
<enumeration value="Invalid"/>
<enumeration value="Indeterminate"/>
</simpleType>
The <status> element of the <KeyBinding> element has the type AssertionStatus.
One or more strings that specify the reason(s) for a particular assertion status.
If the Trust service returns the AssertionStatus value Valid, the <Reason> element lists the status aspects that have been affirmatively verified to be Valid. If the service returns the AssertionStatus value Invalid the Reason element lists the aspects of status that have been determined to be either Invalid or Indeterminate. If the service returns the AssertionStatus value Indeterminate the Reason element lists the aspects of status that have been determined to be Indeterminate.
The status aspects are defined in the table below. For convenience the equivalent X509 processing steps are given:
Aspect |
Description |
X.509 Equivalent |
IssuerTrust |
The assertion issuer is considered to be trustworthy by the Trust service. |
Certificate path anchored by trusted root successfully constructed |
Status |
The Trust service has affirmatively verified the status of the assertion with an authoritative source |
Certificate status validated using CRL or OCSP |
ValidityInterval |
The request was made within the validity interval of the assertion |
The request was made at a time when the certificate chain was valid |
Signature |
Signature on signed data provided by the client in the <ds:Keyinfo> element (e.g. X509Data element) was successfully verified. |
Certificate Signature verified |
The <Respond> element in the request specifies one or more strings included in the request that specify data elements to be provided in the <ds:Keyinfo> element of the response. Each string is a single identifier corresponding to a sub-element of the XML Signature Specification <ds:Keyinfo> element [XML-SIG] or the private key information defined in section 6.3.2. The XML Signature elements are described here for convenience. The normative reference is the specification [XML-SIG].
The Service SHOULD return a requested data element if it is available. The Service MAY return additional data elements that were not requested. In particular, the service MAY return data elements specified in the request with the response.
Defined identifiers include:
Identifier |
<ds:Keyinfo> Element |
Description |
KeyName |
<ds:KeyName> |
Key Name |
KeyValue |
<ds:KeyValue> |
Public key parameters |
X509Cert |
<ds:X509Data> |
X509 Certificate v3 that authenticates the specified key |
X509Chain |
<ds:X509Data>* |
X509 Certificate v3 chain that authenticates the specified key |
X509CRL |
<ds:X509Data> |
X509 Certificate Revocation List v2 |
OCSP |
<ds:X509Data> |
PKIX OCSP token that validates an X509v3 certificate that authenticates the key |
RetrievalMethod |
<ds:RetrievalMethod> |
Retrieval Method data |
MgmtData |
<ds:MgmtData> |
Management Data |
PGP |
<ds:PGPData> |
PGP key signing data |
PGPWeb |
<ds:PGPData>* |
Collection of PGP key signing data |
SPKI |
<ds:SPKIData>* |
SPKI key signing |
Multiple |
|
Specifies that the Trust Service SHOULD return multiple answers to the client if more than one valid answer is available. |
Private |
|
Request that the encrypted private key be returned in the response. [Used in the X-KRSS protocol] |
For example, a client that has no X.509 processing capability might perform a Locate operation to obtain the public key parameters and name information from a <ds:Keyinfo> element that specifies only a certificate. The Respond element values in this case would be "KeyName" and "KeyValue".
The <Respond> element is defined by the following schema:
<element name="Respond" >
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="string" type="string"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
The Locate service accepts as input a <ds:Keyinfo> element that specifies a public key and returns one or more <ds:Keyinfo> elements that relate to the same public key. The <ds:Keyinfo> elements returned are specified by the Respond element in the request.
The request message consists of the Locate element defined by the following schema:
<element name="Locate">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="Query" type="ds:KeyInfo"/>
<element name="Respond" >
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="string" type="string"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
The following elements are defined:
Query
A single complex structure containing a <ds:Keyinfo> element that
specifies the public key for which additional data is requested.
Respond
A sequence of identifiers that specify data elements that the client requests
returned in the response.
The Response Message consists of a <LocateResult> element defined by the following schema:
<element name="LocateResult">
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="Result" type="xkms:ResultCode"/>
<element name="Answer" >
<complexType>
<all>
<element name="ds:KeyInfo" type="ds:KeyInfo"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</all>
</complexType>
</element>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
The following elements are defined:
Answer
A sequence of strings that contain <ds:Keyinfo>
elements that provide the information specified by the Respond attribute, for the public
key identified by the Query element.
The response message returns a ResultCode depending on the success of the Locate operation as follows:
ResultCode |
Number of Elements |
Description |
Success |
At least one element |
The locate operation succeeded. All the information requested was available. |
NoMatch |
No elements |
The locate operation succeeded but returned no matches. |
Incomplete |
At least one element |
The locate operation succeeded. Some of the information requested was not available. |
Failure |
No elements |
The locate operation failed. |
When the protocol is expressed in SOAP, all ResultCode values other than Success, Incomplete and NoMatch are expressed using the SOAP Fault element with a <faultcode> of soap:Server. See the [SOAP] specification for further details. The service MAY return the descriptive text set out in section 3.2.2 above.
The format of the contents returned by the service within the detail element is left as an implementation decision. The following example shows a SOAP fault reporting that a Locate operation failed:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
xmlns:soapenc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
<soap:Body>
<soap:Fault>
<faultcode>soap:Server</faultcode>
<faultstring>The locate operation
failed.</faultstring>
<detail>
</detail>
</soap:Fault>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
The Validate service allows the client to query the binding between a <ds:Keyinfo> element and other data such as an identifier. The client supplies a prototype for the <KeyBinding> assertion requested. The prototype may specify either a <KeyId> or a <ds:Keyinfo> element or both. The server returns one or more <KeyBinding> assertions that meet the criteria specified in the request.
The <ValidityInterval> element specifies limits on the validity of the assertion. It is defined by the following schema:
<complexType name="ValidityInterval">
<sequence>
<element name="NotBefore" type="timeInstant"/>
<element name="NotAfter" type="timeInstant"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
Member |
Type |
Description |
NotBefore |
timeInstant |
Time instant at which the validity interval begins |
NotAfter |
timeInstant |
Time instant at which the validity interval has ended |
All timeInstant MUST fully specify the date.
The <NotBefore> and <NotAfter> elements are optional. If the value is omitted it is unspecified. If the <NotBefore> element is unspecified the assertion is valid on any date up to but excluding the date specified in the <NotAfter> element. If the <NotAfter> element is unspecified the assertion is valid from the <NotBefore> element with no expiry. If neither element is specified the assertion is valid at any time.
In accordance with the XML Schema Specifications, all time instances are interpreted in Universal Coordinated Time unless they explicitly indicate a time zone.
Implementations MUST NOT generate time instances that specify leap seconds.
For purposes of comparison, the time interval <NotBefore> to <NotAfter> begins at the earliest time instant compatible with the specification of <NotBefore> and has ended at the earliest time instant compatible with the specification of <NotAfter>
For example if the time interval specified is dayT12:03:02 to dayT12:05:12 the times 12:03:02.00 and 12:05:11.9999 are within the time interval. The time 12:05:12.0000 is outside the time interval.
The <KeyId> element specifies a URI identifier for the key. The URI MAY be a name (URN), a locator (URL) or anything else permitted by the URI specification. The <KeyId> element is distinct from the <ds:KeyName> element of <ds:Keyinfo> in that the <KeyName> element is not required to be a URI.
When the <KeyId> element in a <KeyBinding> specifies a URL a binding is asserted to the specified address and protocol. For example if the URL specifies an email address it is asserted that the specified key MAY be used by a security enhancement. Similarly a <KeyId> contained in a <Prototype> or <Query> specifies an intention to use the specified key with the protocol indicated.
The following table shows the correspondence between commonly used URL prefixes and security bindings:
Method |
Security Enhancement |
https://host/data |
SSL / TLS. Key is bound to the host name host. |
mailto://user@host |
S/MIME email security, Key is bound to the username user@host |
The <KeyId> element is defined by the following schema:
<element name="KeyID" type="string" minOccurs="0"/>
The <KeyUsage> element specifies one or more intended uses of the key. If no <KeyUsage> is specified all uses are permitted. The <KeyUsage> element is defined by the following schema:
<simpleType name="KeyUsageValue" base="string">
<enumeration value="Encryption"/>
<enumeration value="Signature"/>
<enumeration value="Exchange"/>
</simpleType>
<element name="KeyUsage">
<complexType>
<all>
<element name="string" type="xkms:KeyUsageValue"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</all>
</complexType>
</element>
If a key usage is specified that the algorithm does not support (e.g. use of a DSA key for encryption) the element MUST be ignored.
The following identifiers are defined:
Identifier |
Description |
Encryption |
The key pair may be used for encryption and decryption |
Signature |
The key pair may be used for signature and verification |
Exchange |
The key pair may be used for key exchange |
The <ProcessInfo> element MAY be used to specify processing information associated with a key binding that end clients SHOULD treat as opaque data. The element is defined by the following schema:
<element name="ProcessInfo" type="string" minOccurs="0"/>
The <PassPhrase> element contains a MAC output value encoded as a base64 string.
On initial registration the <PassPhrase> value is obtained by first performing the MAC calculation on the pass phrase value, then performing a second MAC calculation on the result.
To prove knowledge of the pass phrase in a subsequent revocation request the <PassPhrase> value is obtained by performing the MAC calculation on the pass phrase value.
Details of the MAC output value calculation are provided in section 6 below.
The <KeyBinding> element asserts a binding between data elements that relate to a public key including <KeyName>, <KeyID>, <KeyValue> and <X509Data>. Furthermore, the Service represents to the client accessing the service and to that client alone that the binding between the data elements is valid under whatever trust policy the service offers to that client.
The <Query> and <Prototype> elements share the same type definition as <KeyBinding> which is defined by the following schema:
<complexType name="KeyBinding">
<sequence>
<element name="Status" type="xkms:BindingStatus"/>
<element name="KeyID" type="string" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="KeyInfo" type="ds:KeyInfo"/>
<element name="PassPhrase" type="string" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="ProcessInfo" type="string" minOccurs="0"/>
<element name="ValidityInterval" type="xkms:ValidityInterval"/>
<element name="KeyUsage" type="xkms:KeyUsage"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<s:element name="KeyUsage">
<s:complexType>
<s:all>
<s:element name="string" type="s:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</s:all>
</s:complexType>
</s:element>
</sequence>
</complexType>
The request message consists of the <Validate> element defined by the following schema:
<element name="Validate">
<complexType>
<all>
<element name="query" type="xkms:KeyBinding"/>
<element name="respond">
<complexType>
<all>
<element name="string" type="s:string"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</all>
</complexType>
</element>
</all>
</complexType>
</element>
The following elements are defined:
Query
A single KeyBinding structure that is to be
completed and validated.
Respond
A sequence of identifiers that specify data elements that the client requests
be returned in the response.
The Response Message consists of a <ValidateResult> element defined by the following schema:
<element name="ValidateResult">
<complexType>
<all>
<element name="Result" type="xkms:ResultCode"/>
<element name="Answer" >
<complexType>
<sequence>
<element name="KeyBinding" type="xkms:KeyBinding"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</element>
</all>
</complexType>
</element>
The following elements are defined:
Answer
A sequence of <KeyBinding> structures that
contain the results of the validation. If no results are found the sequence is
empty and the <ResultCode>NoMatch returned.
In some circumstances a Locate operation MAY return
multiple matching results.
The response message returns a <ResultCode> depending on the success of the Validate operation as follows:
ResultCode |
Number of Elements |
Description |
Success |
At least one element |
The validate operation succeeded. all the information requested was available. |
NoMatch |
No elements |
The validate operation succeeded but returned no matches. |
Incomplete |
At least one element |
The validate operation succeeded. Some of the information requested was not available. |
Failure |
No elements |
The validate operation failed. |
Note that the Validate operation returns the <ResultCode>Success even if the <KeyBinding> assertion was found to be Invalid or Indeterminate. The <ResultCode> reflects the success or failure of the service query and not the information returned by that query.
When the protocol is expressed in SOAP, all <ResultCode> values other than Success, Incomplete and NoMatch are expressed using the SOAP Fault element with a faultcode of soap:Server. See the [SOAP] specification for further details. The service MAY return the descriptive text set out in section 3.3.8 above.
The XML Key Registration Service Specification permits management of information that is bound to a public key pair.
The service specification supports the following operation:
Register
Information is bound to a public key pair through a XKMS <KeyBinding>
element. Generation of the public key pair by either the client or the server
is supported.
The Register request does not in itself place any requirement on the Registration Service to communicate that information to any other party.
In most applications, however, a Registration Service will provide key information to other trust services such as those described in the XKMS specification or a separate underlying PKI such as PKIX.
Linkage to such an underlying PKI is considered to be an intrinsic property of the Registration Service rather than a parameter that the client application may negotiate. To be useful such a negotiation service would need to express more than the syntax of the credentials issued.
If necessary, Registration Services may offer links to multiple underlying PKIs through separate service address URIs. For example:
http://register.xmltrustcenter.org/pgp
Obtain a PGP credential
http://register.xmltrustcenter.org/x509/public_class2
Obtain an X.509v3 credential in the "Trust Center Public Class 2"
hierarchy
http://register.xmltrustcenter.org/private/AKEHJQ
Obtain an X.509v3 credential in a private hierarchy, the details of which the
client application does not understand
The <ds:Keyinfo> elements <ds:X509Data>, <ds:PGPData> and <ds:SPKIData> MAY be used to return credentials issued in an underlying PKI. Alternatively the client may request that a <ds:RetrievalMethod> element be returned in the response to allow retrieval of the credential to be generated (e.g. an X.509v3 certificate).
The Register request is used to assert a binding of information to a public key pair. Generation of the public key pair MAY be performed by either the client or the Registration service.
The Registration request message consists of a prototype of the requested assertion. The Registration Service MAY require the client to provide additional information to authenticate the request. If the public key pair is generated by the client, the service MAY require the client to provide Proof of Possession of the private key.
The Registration service MAY accept the name specified in the prototype or MAY substitute its own name.
On receipt of a registration request, the registration service verifies the authentication and POP information provided (if any). If the registration service accepts the request an assertion is registered. This assertion MAY include some, all or none of the information provided by the prototype assertion and MAY include additional information.
The Registration Service MAY return part or all of the registered assertion to the client.

Figure 5: Registration of a KeyBinding
Alice requests registration of an RSA key pair for her email address Alice@cryptographer.test. Alice has previously received from the trust service the code "024837" with which to authenticate her request. Alice selects the pass phrase "Help I have revealed my key" to authenticate herself should it be necessary to revoke the registration at a later date.
The X-KRSS request message consists of the following <Register> element:
<Register>
<Prototype Id="keybinding">
<Status>Valid</Status>
<KeyID>mailto:Alice@cryptographer.test</KeyID>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyValue>
<ds:RSAKeyValue>
<ds:Modulus>
998/T2PUN8HQlnhf9YIKdMHHGM7HkJwA56UD0a1oYq7E
fdxSXAidruAszNqBoOqfarJIsfcVKLob1hGnQ/l6xw
</ds:Modulus>
<ds:Exponent>AQAB</ds:Exponent>
</ds:RSAKeyValue>
</ds:KeyValue>
<ds:KeyName>mailto:Alice@cryptographer.test</ds:KeyName>
</ds:KeyInfo>
<PassPhrase>Pass</PassPhrase>
</Prototype>
<AuthInfo>
<AuthUserInfo>
<ProofOfPossession>
<ds:Signature URI="#keybinding"
[RSA-Sign (KeyBinding, Private)] />
</ProofOfPossession>
<KeyBindingAuth>
<ds:Signature URI="#keybinding"
[HMAC-SHA1 (KeyBinding, Auth)] />
</KeyBindingAuth>
</AuthUserInfo>
</AuthInfo>
<Respond>
<string>KeyName<string>
<string>KeyValue</string>
<string>RetrievalMethod</string>
</Respond>
</Register>
Where:
Auth = HMAC-SHA1
("024837", 0x1)
Pass = HMAC-SHA1 (HMAC-SHA1 ("helpihaverevealedmykey", 0x2),
0x3)
For clarity, the details of the signature elements are omitted. In each case the signature scope is the <KeyBinding> element and the signature scope is specified by reference. The MAC function used in this case is HMAC-SHA1 as defined in [RFC-2104]. The notation f(m, k) is used to indicate the message m signed under the key k. Further details are provided in section 6.1 .
The service accepts the registration and returns the following response:
<RegisterResult>
<Result>Success</Result>
<Answer>
<Status>Valid</Status>
<KeyID>mailto:Alice@cryptographer.test</KeyID>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:RetrievalMethod
URI="http://www.PKeyDir.test/Certificates/01293122"
Type="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#X509Data"/>
<ds:KeyValue>
<ds:RSAKeyValue>
<ds:Modulus>998/T2PUN8HQlnhf9YIKdMHHGM7HkJwA56UD0a1oYq7Ef
dxSXAidruAszNqBoOqfarJIsfcVKLob1hGnQ/l6xw</ds:Modulus>
<ds:Exponent>AQAB</ds:Exponent>
</ds:RSAKeyValue>
</ds:KeyValue>
<ds:KeyName>mailto:Alice@cryptographer.test</ds:KeyName>
</ds:KeyInfo>
</Answer>
</RegisterResult>
The request for registration of a service generated key pair omits the public key data and requests that private key data be returned with the response.
<Register>
<Prototype Id="keybinding">
<Status>Valid</Status>
<KeyID>mailto:Alice@cryptographer.test</KeyID>
<KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyInfo>
<ds:KeyName>mailto:Alice@cryptographer.test</ds:KeyName>
</ds:KeyInfo>
</KeyInfo>
<PassPhrase>Pass</PassPhrase>
</Prototype>
<AuthInfo>
<AuthServerInfo>
<KeyBindingAuth>
<ds:Signature URI="#keybinding"
[HMAC-SHA1 (Prototype, Auth)] />
</KeyBindingAuth>
</AuthServerInfo>
</AuthInfo>
<Respond>
<string>KeyName</string>
<string>KeyValue</string>
<string>Private</string>
</Respond>
</Register>
Where
Auth = HMAC-SHA1 ("024837", 0x1)
Pass = HMAC-SHA1 (HMAC-SHA1 ("helpihaverevealedmykey", 0x2),
0x3)
The response includes both the public key data and the encrypted private key: