Copyright © 2003 W3C® (MIT, ERCIM, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply.
This document defines formally the semantics of XQuery 1.0 [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] XPath 2.0 [XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0].
This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the latest revision of this technical report can be found in the W3C technical reports index at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
This is a public W3C Working Draft for review by W3C Members and other interested parties. This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. It is a draft document and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "work in progress." A list of current public W3C technical reports can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR/.
Publication as a Working Draft does not imply endorsement by the W3C Membership. This is a draft document and may be updated, replaced or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to cite this document as other than work in progress. It contains a number of open issues, and should not be considered to be fully stable. Vendors who wish to create preview implementations based on this document do so at their own risk. While this document reflects the general consensus of the working groups, there are still controversial areas that may be subject to change.
This version reflects the most recent semantics of [XPath/XQuery]. Among the most important changes from the previous version of this document are:
Implementation of the semantics of namespaces in [XPath/XQuery]. This closes Issue 443 (FS-Issue-0100: Namespace resolution) and Issue 508 (FS-Issue-0165: Namespaces in element constructors).
A simplified static semantics for path expressions. This closes Issue 475 (FS-Issue-0132: Typing for descendant), Issue 527 (Static typing of XPath index expressions), and Issue 560 (Exactness of Type Inference).
Public feedback is requested on the remaining open XPath issues: Issue 481 (Semantics of Schema Context), Issue 496 (Support for lax and strict wildcards), Issue 555 (Formal Semantics of Module Import), Issue 556 (Formal Semantics of Variable Definitions), Issue 557 (Formal semantics of Validation Declaration), and Issue 559 (New Sequence Type needs to be fully implemented in Formal Semantics).
This Working Draft references the Last Call Working Drafts of [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] and [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model]. Since these Last Call Working Drafts are not being re-published along with this Working Draft, it is possible that some differences may exist between this Working Draft and the Last Call Working Drafts. The public is encouraged to provide feedback on any differences that they find. The Working Groups are planning to publish a set of synchronized documents as early as possible.
Public comments on this document and its open issues are welcome. Comments should be sent to the W3C XPath/XQuery mailing list, public-qt-comments@w3.org (archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/).
XQuery 1.0, XPath 2.0, and their formal semantics has been defined jointly by the XML Query Working Group and the XSL Working Group (both part of the XML Activity).
Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the XML Query Working Group's patent disclosure page at http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xmlquery-IPR-statements and the XSL Working Group's patent disclosure page at http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/Disclosures.
1 Introduction
2 Preliminaries
2.1 Introduction to the Formal Semantics
2.1.1 Notations from grammar productions
2.1.2 Notations for judgments
2.1.3 Notations for inference rules
2.1.4 Notations for environments
2.1.5 Putting it together
2.2 XML Values
2.2.1 Formal values
2.2.2 Examples of values
2.3 The [XPath/XQuery] Type System
2.3.1 XML Schema and the [XPath/XQuery] Type System
2.3.2 Item types
2.3.3 Content models
2.3.4 Top level definitions
2.3.5 Example of a complete Schema
2.4 Processing model and main judgments
2.4.1 Processing model
2.4.2 Normalization judgment
2.4.3 Static typing judgment
2.4.4 Dynamic evaluation judgment
2.5 Relationship with other documents
2.5.1 Namespaces
2.5.2 Functions and operators
3 Basics
3.1 Expression Context
3.1.1 Static Context
3.1.1.1 Predefined Types
3.1.2 Dynamic Context
3.2 Processing Model
3.3 Important Concepts
3.3.1 Document Order
3.3.2 Typed Value and String Value
3.3.3 Input Sources
3.4 Types
3.4.1 SequenceType
3.4.1.1 SequenceType Matching
3.4.2 Type Conversions
3.4.2.1 Atomization
3.4.2.2 Effective Boolean Value
3.4.2.3 XPath 1.0 Backward Compatibility
3.5 Errors Handling
3.6 Optional Features
3.6.1 Basic XQuery
3.6.2 Schema Import Feature
3.6.3 Static Typing Feature
3.6.4 Extensions
3.6.4.1 Pragmas
3.6.4.2 Must-Understand Extensions
3.6.4.3 XQuery Flagger
4 Expressions
4.1 Primary Expressions
4.1.1 Literals
4.1.2 Variables
4.1.3 Parenthesized Expressions
4.1.4 Context Item Expression
4.1.5 Function Calls
4.1.6 [XPath/XQuery] Comments
4.2 Path Expressions
4.2.1 Steps
4.2.1.1 Axes
4.2.1.2 Node Tests
4.2.2 Predicates
4.2.3 Unabbreviated Syntax
4.2.4 Abbreviated Syntax
4.3 Sequence Expressions
4.3.1 Constructing Sequences
4.3.2 Combining Sequences
4.4 Arithmetic Expressions
4.5 Comparison Expressions
4.5.1 Value Comparisons
4.5.2 General Comparisons
4.5.3 Node Comparisons
4.5.4 Order Comparisons
4.6 Logical Expressions
4.7 Constructors
4.7.1 Direct Element Constructors
4.7.1.1 Attributes
4.7.1.2 Namespaces
4.7.1.3 Content
4.7.1.4 Whitespace in Element Content
4.7.1.5 Type of a Constructed Element
4.7.2 Other Direct Constructors
4.7.3 Computed Constructors
4.7.3.1 Computed Element Constructors
4.7.3.2 Computed Attribute Constructors
4.7.3.3 Document Node Constructors
4.7.3.4 Text Nodes Constructors
4.7.3.5 Computed Processing Instruction Constructors
4.7.3.6 Computed Comment Constructors
4.7.3.7 Computed Namespace Constructors
4.8 [For/FLWR] Expressions
4.8.1 FLWOR expressions
4.8.2 For expression
4.8.3 Let Expression
4.8.4 Order By and Return Clauses
4.9 Unordered Expressions
4.10 Conditional Expressions
4.11 Quantified Expressions
4.12 Expressions on SequenceTypes
4.12.1 Instance Of
4.12.2 Typeswitch
4.12.3 Cast
4.12.4 Castable
4.12.5 Constructor Functions
4.12.6 Treat
4.13 Validate Expressions
5 Modules and Prologs
5.1 Version Declaration
5.2 Namespace Declarations
5.3 Default Namespace Declarations
5.4 Schema Imports
5.5 Module Imports
5.6 Variable Definitions
5.7 Validation Declaration
5.8 Xmlspace Declaration
5.9 Default Collation
5.10 Function Definitions
6 Additional Semantics of Functions
6.1 Formal Semantics Functions
6.1.1 The fs:distinct-doc-order function
6.1.2 The fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence function
6.1.3 The fs:item-sequence-to-untypedAtomic function
6.1.4 The fs:convert-simple-operand function
6.1.5 The fs:convert-operand function
6.1.6
The arithmetic operator pseudo-functions:
fs:minus,
fs:plus,
fs:times,
fs:idiv,
fs:div, and
fs:mod
6.1.7
The comparison pseudo-functions:
fs:eq,
fs:ne,
fs:lt,
fs:le,
fs:gt, and
fs:ge
6.2 Standard functions with specific typing rules
6.2.1 The fn:error function
6.2.2 The fn:distinct-nodes and
fn:distinct-values functions
6.2.3 The fn:collection and fn:doc functions
6.2.4 The op:union, op:intersect, and
op:except operators
6.2.5 The fn:data function
6.2.6 The fn:ceiling, fn:floor,
fn:round, and fn:round-half-to-even functions
6.2.7 The fn:subsequence, and fn:remove functions
6.2.8 The fn:min
fn:max, fn:avg, and fn:sum functions
7 Auxiliary Judgments
7.1 Judgments for schema contexts
7.1.1 Mode is
7.1.2 Context is
7.2 Judgments for accessing types
7.2.1 Derives
7.2.2 Substitutes
7.2.3 Element and attribute type lookup
7.2.4 Static element and attribute type lookup
7.2.5 Extension
7.2.6 Type adjustment
7.2.7 Type expansion
7.3 Judgments for step expressions and filtering
7.3.1 Principal Node Kind
7.3.2 Auxiliary judgments for axis
7.3.2.1 Static semantics of axis
7.3.2.2 Dynamic semantics of axis
7.3.3 Auxiliary judgments for node tests
7.3.3.1 Static typing of node tests
7.3.3.2 Dynamic semantics of node tests
7.3.4 Attribute filtering
7.4 Judgments for type matching
7.4.1 Matches
7.4.2 Subtype
7.5 Judgments for sequences of item types
7.6 Judgments for type promotion
7.7 Judgments for the validate expression
7.7.1 Builtin attributes
7.7.2 Mixed content
7.7.3 Type resolution
7.7.4 Interleaving
7.7.5 Erasure
7.7.5.1 Simply erases
7.7.5.2 Erases
7.7.6 Annotate
7.7.6.1 Simply annotate
7.7.6.2 Nil-annotate
7.7.6.3 Annotate
7.7.7 Validates as
8 Importing Schemas
8.1 Introduction
8.1.1 Features
8.1.2 Organization
8.1.3 Main mapping rules
8.1.4 Special attributes
8.1.4.1 use
8.1.4.2 minOccurs and maxOccurs
8.1.4.3 mixed
8.1.4.4 nillable
8.1.4.5 substitutionGroup
8.1.5 Anonymous type names
8.2 Attribute Declarations
8.2.1 Global attributes declarations
8.2.2 Local attribute declarations
8.3 Element Declarations
8.3.1 Global element declarations
8.3.2 Local element declarations
8.4 Complex Type Definitions
8.4.1 Global complex type
8.4.2 Local complex type
8.4.3 Complex type with simple content
8.4.4 Complex type with complex content
8.5 Attribute Uses
8.6 Attribute Group Definitions
8.6.1 Attribute group definitions
8.6.2 Attribute group reference
8.7 Model Group Definitions
8.8 Model Groups
8.8.1 All groups
8.8.2 Choice groups
8.8.3 Sequence groups
8.9 Particles
8.9.1 Element reference
8.9.2 Group reference
8.10 Wildcards
8.10.1 Attribute wildcards
8.10.2 Element wildcards
8.11 Identity-constraint Definitions
8.12 Notation Declarations
8.13 Annotation
8.14 Simple Type Definitions
8.14.1 Global simple type definition
8.14.2 Local simple type definition
8.14.3 Simple type content
8.15 Schemas as a whole
8.15.1 Schema
8.15.2 Include
8.15.3 Redefine
8.15.4 Import
A Normalized core grammar
A.1 Core BNF
B Functions and Operators
B.1 Functions and Operators used in the Formal Semantics
B.2 Mapping of Overloaded Internal Functions
C References
C.1 Normative References
C.2 Non-normative References
C.3 Background References
D XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Issues
This document defines the formal semantics of XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0. The present document is part of a set of documents that together define the XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 languages:
[XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] introduces the XQuery 1.0 language, defines its capabilities from a user-centric view, and defines the language syntax.
[XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0] introduces the XPath 2.0 language, defines its capabilities from a user-centric view, and defines the language syntax.
[XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] lists the functions and operators defined for the [XPath/XQuery] language and specifies to which arguments they can be applied and what the result should be.
[XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model] formally specifies the data model used by [XPath/XQuery] to represent the content of XML documents. The [XPath/XQuery] language is formally defined by operations on this data model.
[XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model Serialization] specifies how [XPath/XQuery] data model values are serialized back into XML.
The scope and goals for the [XPath/XQuery] language are discussed in the charter of the W3C [XSL/XML Query] Working Group and in the [XPath/XQuery] requirements [XML Query 1.0 Requirements].
This document defines the semantics of [XPath/XQuery] by giving a precise formal meaning to each of the expressions of the [XPath/XQuery] specification in terms of the [XPath/XQuery] data model. This document assumes that the reader is already familiar with the [XPath/XQuery] language.
Two important design aspects of [XPath/XQuery] are that it is functional and that it is typed. These two aspects play an important role in the [XPath/XQuery] Formal Semantics.
[XPath/XQuery] is a functional language. [XPath/XQuery] is built from expressions, rather than statements. Every construct in the language (except for the XQuery query prolog) is an expression and expressions can be composed arbitrarily. The result of one expression can be used as the input to any other expression, as long as the type of the result of the former expression is compatible with the input type of the latter expression with which it is composed. Another aspect of the functional approach is that variables are always passed by value and their value cannot be modified through side-effects.
[XPath/XQuery] is a typed language. Types can be imported from one or more XML Schemas that describe the input documents and the output document, and the [XPath/XQuery] language can then perform operations based on these types. In addition, [XPath/XQuery] supports static type analysis. This means a static analysis phase is defined on [XPath/XQuery] expressions that infers the output type of an expression, based on the type of its inputs. Static typing allows early detection of type errors, and can be used as the basis for certain forms of optimization. The [XPath/XQuery] type system captures most of the features of [XML Schema Part 1], including global and local element and attribute declarations, complex and simple type definitions, named and anonymous types, derivation by restriction, extension, list and union, substitution groups, and wildcard types. It does not model uniqueness constraints and facet constraints on simple types.
This document is organized as follows. [2 Preliminaries] introduces the notations used to define the [XPath/XQuery] formal semantics. These include the formal notations for values in the [XPath/XQuery] data model and for types in XML Schema. The next three sections: [3 Basics], [4 Expressions], and [5 Modules and Prologs] have the same structure as the corresponding sections in the [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] and [XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0] documents. This allows the reader to quickly find the formal definition of a particular language construct. [3 Basics] defines the semantics for basic [XPath/XQuery] concepts, and [4 Expressions] defines the dynamic and static semantics of each [XPath/XQuery] expression. [5 Modules and Prologs] defines the semantics of the [XPath/XQuery] prolog. [6 Additional Semantics of Functions] defines the static semantics of several functions in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] and gives the dynamic and static semantics of several supporting functions used in this document. The remaining sections, [7 Auxiliary Judgments] and [8 Importing Schemas], contain material that supports the formal semantics of [XPath/XQuery]. [7 Auxiliary Judgments] defines formal judgments that relate data model values to types, that relate types to types, and that support the formal definition of validation. These judgements are used in the definition of expressions in [4 Expressions]. Lastly, [8 Importing Schemas], specifies how XML Schema documents are imported into the [XPath/XQuery] type system and relates XML Schema types to the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
This section provides the background necessary to understand the [XPath/XQuery] Formal Semantics and introduces the notations that are used.
Why a Formal Semantics? The goal of the formal semantics is to complement the [XPath/XQuery] specification ([XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] and [XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0]), by defining the meaning of [XPath/XQuery] expressions with mathematical rigor.
A rigorous formal semantics clarifies the intended meaning of the English specification, ensures that no corner cases are left out, and provides a reference for implementation.
Why use formal notations? Rigor is achieved by the use of formal notations to represent [XPath/XQuery] objects such as expressions, XML values, and XML Schema types, and by the systematic definition of the relationships between those objects to reflect the meaning of the language. In particular, the dynamic semantics relates [XPath/XQuery] expressions to the XML value to which they evaluate, and the static semantics relates [XPath/XQuery] expressions to the XML Schema type that is infered for that expression.
The Formal Semantics uses several kinds of formal notations to define the relationships between [XPath/XQuery] expressions, XML values, and XML Schema types. This section contains a small tutorial to introduce the notations for judgments, inference rules, and mapping rules as well as the notation for environments, which implement the dynamic and static contexts. The reader already familiar with these notations can skip this section and continue with [2.2 XML Values].
Grammar productions are used to describe "objects" (values, types, [XPath/XQuery] expressions, etc.) manipulated by the Formal Semantics. The Formal Semantics makes use of several kinds of grammar productions.
XQuery grammar productions describe the XQuery language and expressions. XQuery productions are identified by a number, which corresponds to the number in the [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] document, and are annotated with "(XQuery)". For instance, the following production describes FLWR expressions in XQuery.
| [42 (XQuery)] | FLWORExpr | ::= | (ForClause | LetClause)+ WhereClause? OrderByClause? "return" ExprSingle |
For the purpose of this document, the differences between the XQuery 1.0 and the XPath 2.0 grammars are mostly irrelevant. By default, this document uses XQuery 1.0 grammar productions. Whenever the grammar for XPath 2.0 differs from the one for XQuery 1.0, the corresponding XPath 2.0 productions are also given. XPath productions are identified by a number, which corresponds to the number in [XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0], and are annotated with "(XPath)". For instance, the following production describes for expressions in XPath.
| [25 (XPath)] | ForExpr | ::= | SimpleForClause "return" ExprSingle |
XQuery Core grammar productions describe the XQuery Core. The complete XQuery Core grammar is given in [A Normalized core grammar]. XQuery Core productions are identified by a number, which corresponds to the number in [A Normalized core grammar], and are annotated by "(Core)". For instance, the following production describes the simpler form of "for" expressions present in the XQuery Core.
The Formal Semantics sometimes needs to manipulate "objects" (values, types, expressions, etc.) for which there is no existing grammar production in the [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] document. In these cases, specific grammar productions are introduced. Notably, additional productions are used to describe values in the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model], and to describe the [XPath/XQuery] type system. Formal Semantics productions are identified by a number, and are annotated by "(Formal)". For instance, the following production describes global type definitions in the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
| [43 (Formal)] | Definition | ::= | ("define" "element" ElementName Substitution? Nillable? TypeReference) |
Note that grammar productions that are specific to the Formal Semantics (i.e., with the "(Formal)" annotation) are not part of [XPath/XQuery]. They are not accessible to the user and are only used in the course of defining the language's semantics.
The basic building block of the formal specification is called a judgment. A judgment expresses whether a property holds or not.
For example:
Notation
The judgment
holds if the object Painting is beautiful.
Notation
Here are three judgments that are used extensively in this document.
The judgment
holds if the expression Expr yields (or evaluates to) the value Value.
The judgment
holds when the expression Expr has type Type.
The judgment
holds when the expression Expr raises the error Error.
A judgment can contain symbols and patterns.
Symbols are purely syntactic and are used to write the judgment itself. In general, symbols in a judgment are chosen to reflect its meaning. For example, 'is beautiful', '=>' and ':' are symbols, the second and third of which should be read "yields", and "has type" respectively.
Patterns are written with italicized words. The name of a pattern is significant: each pattern name corresponds to an "object" (a value, a type, an expression, etc.) that can be substituted legally for the pattern. By convention, all patterns in the Formal Semantics correspond to grammar non-terminals, and are used to represent entities that can be constructed through application of the corresponding grammar production. For example, Expr represents any [XPath/XQuery] expression, and Value represents any value in the [XPath/XQuery] data model.
When applying the judgment, each pattern must be instantiated to an appropriate sort of "object" (value, type, expression, etc). For example, '3 => 3' and '$x+0 => 3' are both instances of the judgment 'Expr => Value'. Note that in the first judgment, '3' corresponds to both the expression '3' (on the left-hand side of the => symbol) and to the the value '3' (on the right-hand side of the => symbol).
Patterns may appear with subscripts (e.g. Expr1, Expr2) to distinguish different instances of the same sort of pattern. Each distinct pattern must be instantiated to a single "object" (value, type, expression, etc.). If the same pattern occurs twice in a judgment description then it should be instantiated with the same "object". For example, '3 => 3' is an instance of the judgment 'Expr1 => Expr1' but '$x+0 => 3' is not since the two expressions '$x+0' and '3' cannot be both instance of the pattern Expr1. The judgment'$x+0 => 3' is an instance of the judgment 'Expr1 => Expr2'.
In a few cases, patterns may have a name which is not exactly the name of a grammar production but is based on it. For instance, a BaseTypeName is a pattern which stands for a type name, as would TypeName, or TypeName2. This usage is limited, and only occurs to improve the readability of some of the inference rules.
Inference rules are used to specify whether a judgment holds or not. Inference rules express the logical relation between judgments and describe how complex judgments can be concluded from simpler premise judgments.
A logical inference rule is written as a collection of premises and a conclusion, respectively written above and below a dividing line:
| premise1 ... premisen |
| conclusion |
All premises and the conclusion are judgments. The interpretation of an inference rule is: if all the premise judgments above the line hold, then the conclusion judgment below the line must also hold.
Here is a simple example of inference rule, which uses the example judgment 'Expr => Value' from above:
| $x => 0 3 => 3 |
| $x + 3 => 3 |
This inference rule expresses the following property of the judgment 'Expr => Value': if the variable expression '$x' yields the value '0', and the literal expression '3' yields the value '3', then the expression '$x + 3' yields the value '3'.
It is also possible for an inference rule to have no premises above the line to have no judgments at all; this simply means that the expression below the line always holds:
| 3 => 3 |
This inference rule expresses the following property of the judgment 'Expr => Value': evaluating the literal expression '3' always yields the value '3'.
The two above rules are expressed in terms of specific variables and values, but usually rules are more abstract. That is, the judgments they relate contain patterns. For example, here is a rule that says that for any variable Variable that yields the integer value Integer, adding '0' yields the same integer value:
| Variable => Integer |
| Variable + 0 => Integer |
As in a judgment, each pattern in a particular inference rule must be instantiated to the same "object" within the entire rule. This means that one can talk about "the value of Variable" instead of the more precise "what Variable is instantiated to in (this particular instantiation of) the inference rule".
Note
In effect, inference rules are just a notation that describes a bottom-up algorithm, for instance an evaluation algorithm where the result of an expression depends on the result for its sub-expressions.
Logical inference rules use environments to record information computed during static type analysis or dynamic evaluation so that this information can be used by other logical inference rules. For example, the type signature of a user-defined function in a [expression/query] prolog can be recorded in an environment and used by subsequent rules. Similarly, the value assigned to a variable within a "let" expression can be captured in an environment and used for further evaluations.
An environment is a dictionary that maps a symbol (e.g., a function name or a variable name) to an "object" (e.g., a function body, a type, a value). One can either access existing information from an environment, or update the environment.
If "env" is an environment, then "env(symbol)" denotes the "object" to which symbol is mapped. The notation is intentionally akin to function application as an environment can be seen as a function from the argument symbol to the "object" to which the symbol is mapped.
This document uses environment groups that group related environments. If "env" is an environment group with the member "mem", then that environment is denoted "env.mem" and the value that it maps symbol to is denoted "env.mem(symbol)".
Updating is only defined on environment groups:
"env + mem(symbol => object) " denotes the new environment group that is identical to env except that the mem environment has been updated to map symbol to object. The notation symbol => object indicates that symbol is mapped to object in the new environment.
If the "object" is a type then the following notation relates a symbol to a type: "env + mem(symbol : object) ".
The following shorthand is also allowed: "env + mem( symbol1 => object1 ; ... ; symboln => objectn ) " in which each symbol is mapped to a corresponding object in the new environment.
This notation is equivalent to nested updates, as in " (env + mem( symbol1 => object1) + ... ) + mem(symboln => objectn)".
Note that updating the environment overrides any previous binding that might exist for the same name. Updating the environment is used to capture the scope of a symbol (e.g., a variable, a namespace prefix, etc.) Also, note that there are no operations to remove entries from environments: this is never necessary because updating an the environment group effectively creates a new extended copy of the original environment group, and the original environme group remains accessible along with the updated copy.
Environments are typically used as part of a judgment, to capture some of the context in which the judgment is computed. Indeed, most judgments are computed assuming that some environment is given. This assumption is denoted by prefixing the judgment with "env |-". The "|-" symbol is called a "turnstile" and is used in almost all inference rules.
For instance, the judgment
is read as: Assuming the dynamic environment dynEnv, the expression Expr yields the value Value.
The two main environments used in the Formal Semantics are: a dynamic environment (dynEnv), which captures the [XPath/XQuery]'s dynamic context, and a static environment (statEnv), which captures the [XPath/XQuery]'s static context. Both are defined in [3.1 Expression Context].
Putting the above notations together, here is an example of an inference rule that occurs later in this document:
This rule is read as follows: if two expressions Expr1 and Expr2 are known to have the static types types Type1 and Type2 (the two premises above the line), then it is the case that the expression below the line "Expr1 , Expr2" must have the static type "Type1, Type2", which is the sequence of types Type1 and Type2.
The above inference rule, does not modify the (static) environment. The following rule defines the static semantics of a "let" expression. The binding of the new variable is captured by an update to the varType component of the original static environment.
| statEnv |- Expr1 : Type1 statEnv + varType(QName : Type1) |- Expr2 : Type2 |
statEnv |-
let
$QName := Expr1
return
Expr2 : Type2
|
This rule is as follows: First, the type Type1 for the "let" input expression Expr1 is computed. Second the "let" variable is added into the varType component of the static environment group statEnv, with type Type1. Finally, the type Type2 of Expr2 is computed in that new environment.
| Editorial note | |
| Jonathan suggests that we should explain 'chain' inference rules. I.e., how several inference rules are applied recursively. | |
[XPath/XQuery] manipulates XML values as defined in the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model]. XML values are composed of nodes, atomic values and sequences. This section introduces formal notations for describing [XPath/XQuery] values from [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model]. These notations are used to describe and manipulate values in inference rules, but are not exposed to the [XPath/XQuery] user.
A value is a sequence of zero or more items. An item is either an atomic value or a node.
An atomic value is a value in the value space of an atomic
type and is labeled with the name of that atomic type. An XML
Schema atomic type [XML Schema Part 2] may be primitive or derived,
or xdt:untypedAtomic.
A node is either an element, an attribute, a document, a
text, a comment, or a processing-instruction node. Elements have
a type annotation and contain a value. Attributes have a type
annotation and contain a simple value, which is a sequence of
atomic values. Text nodes always contain one string value of
type xdt:untypedAtomic, therefore the corresponding type
annotation is omitted.
A type annotation can be either the QName of a declared type or an anonymous type. An anonymous type corresponds to an XML Schema type for which the schema writer did not provide a name. Anonymous type names are not visible to the user, but are generated during schema validation and used to annotate nodes in the data model. By convention, anonymous type names are written in the Formal Semantics as: [Anon0], [Anon1], etc.
Untyped elements (e.g., from well-formed documents) are
annotated with xs:anyType, untyped attributes are annotated
with xs:anySimpleType, and untyped atomic values (i.e., text
content or attribute content in well-formed documents) are
annotated with xdt:untypedAtomic.
An element has an optional "nilled" marker. This
marker can only be present if the element has been validated
against an element type in the schema which is
"nillable", and they have no content and an
attribute xsi:nil set to "true".
An element also has a sequence of namespace annotations, which are the set of active namespace declarations that are in-scope for the element. Each namespace annotation is a prefix, URI pair. Namespace annotations are not values, i.e., they are never the result of evaluating an arbitrary expression, and only occur as annotations on elements. In examples, we omit the namespace annotations when they are empty. For example, the following two values are equivalent:
element weight of type xs:integer { text { "42" } } {}
element weight of type xs:integer { text { "42" } }
| [14 (Formal)] | Value | ::= | Item |
| [25 (Formal)] | Item | ::= | NodeValue |
| [26 (Formal)] | AtomicValue | ::= | AtomicValueContent TypeAnnotation |
| [7 (Formal)] | AtomicValueContent | ::= | String |
| [8 (Formal)] | TypeAnnotation | ::= | "of" "type" TypeName |
| [16 (Formal)] | ElementValue | ::= | "element" ElementName "nilled"? TypeAnnotation "{" Value "}" "{" NamespaceAnnotations "}" |
| [17 (Formal)] | AttributeValue | ::= | "attribute" AttributeName TypeAnnotation "{" SimpleValue "}" |
| [15 (Formal)] | SimpleValue | ::= | AtomicValue |
| [18 (Formal)] | DocumentValue | ::= | "document" "{" Value "}" |
| [20 (Formal)] | CommentValue | ::= | "comment" "{" String "}" |
| [21 (Formal)] | ProcessingInstructionValue | ::= | "processing-instruction" QName "{" String "}" |
| [19 (Formal)] | TextValue | ::= | "text" "{" String "}" |
| [24 (Formal)] | NodeValue | ::= | ElementValue |
| [9 (Formal)] | ElementName | ::= | QName |
| [12 (Formal)] | AttributeName | ::= | QName |
| [27 (Formal)] | TypeName | ::= | QName | AnonymousTypeName |
| [13 (Formal)] | AnonymousTypeName | ::= | [Anon1] | [Anon2] | ... |
| [22 (Formal)] | NamespaceAnnotations | ::= | NamespaceAnnotation ... NamespaceAnnotation |
| [23 (Formal)] | NamespaceAnnotation | ::= | "namespace" NCName "{" AnyURI "}" |
Notation
In the above grammar, "String" indicates the
value space of xs:string, "Decimal" indicates
the value space of xs:decimal, etc.
Note that the same rule about constructing sequences apply to
the values described by that grammar. Notably sequences cannot
be nested. For example, the sequence (10, (1, 2), (), (3,
4)) is equivalent to the sequence (10, 1, 2, 3,
4).
A well-formed document
<fact>The cat weighs <weight units="lbs">12</weight> pounds.</fact>
In the absence of a Schema, this document is represented as
element fact of type xs:anyType {
text { "The cat weighs " },
element weight of type xs:anyType {
attribute units of type xs:anySimpleType {
"lbs" of type xdt:untypedAtomic
}
text { "12" }
},
text { " pounds." }
}
A document before and after validation.
<weight xsi:type="xs:integer">42</weight>
The formal model for values can represent values before and after validation. Before validation, this element is represented as:
element weight of type xs:anyType {
attribute xsi:type of type xs:anySimpleType {
"xs:integer" of type xdt:untypedAtomic
},
text { "42" }
}
After validation, this element is represented as:
element weight of type xs:integer {
attribute xsi:type of type xs:QName {
"xs:integer" of type xs:QName
},
42 of type xs:integer
}
An element with a list type
<sizes>1 2 3</sizes>
Before validation, this element is represented as:
element sizes of type xs:anyType {
text { "1 2 3" }
}
Assume the following Schema.
<xs:element name="sizes" type="sizesType"/>
<xs:simpleType name="sizesType">
<xs:list itemType="sizeType"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="sizeType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:integer"/>
</xs:simpleType>
After validation against this Schema, the element is represented as:
element sizes of type sizesType {
1 of type sizeType,
2 of type sizeType,
3 of type sizeType
}
An element with an anonymous type
<sizes>1 2 3</sizes>
Before validation, this element is represented as:
element sizes of type xs:anyType {
text { "1 2 3" }
}
Assume the following Schema.
<xs:element name="sizes">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:list itemType="xs:integer"/>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:element>
After validation, this element is represented as:
element sizes of type [Anon1] {
1 of type xs:integer,
2 of type xs:integer,
3 of type xs:integer
}
where [Anon1] stands for the internal anonymous
name generated by the system for the sizes
element.
An element with a nillable
<sizes xsi:nil="true"/>
Before validation, this element is represented as:
element sizes of type xs:anyType {
attribute xsi:nil of type xs:anySimpleType { "true" }
}
Assume the following Schema.
<xs:element name="sizes" type="sizesType" nillable="true"/>
After validation against this Schema, the element is represented as:
element sizes nilled of type sizesType {
attribute xsi:nil of type xs:anySimpleType { "true" }
}
An element with a union type
<sizes>1 two 3 four</sizes>
Before validation, this element is represented as:
element sizes of type xs:anyType {
text { "1 two 3 four" }
}
Assume the following Schema:
<xs:element name="sizes" type="sizesType"/>
<xs:simpleType name="sizesType">
<xs:list itemType="sizeType"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="sizeType">
<xs:union memberType="xs:integer xs:string"/>
</xs:simpleType>
After validation against this Schema, the element is represented as:
element sizes of type sizesType {
1 of type xs:integer,
"two" of type xs:string,
3 of type xs:integer,
"four" of type xs:string
}
The [XPath/XQuery] type system is used in the specification of the dynamic and of the static semantics of [XPath/XQuery]. This section introduces formal notations for describing types.
The [XPath/XQuery] type system is based on XML Schema. Formalizing the treatment of types in [XPath/XQuery], however, requires some adjustments.
Use of formal notations for types. The Formal Semantics uses formal notations for types instead of XML Schema syntax. Those notations are used extensively to describe and manipulate types in the inference rules. The formal notations for types introduced here are not exposed to the [XPath/XQuery] user.
Representation of content models. For the purpose of
static typing, the [XPath/XQuery] type system only describes
minOccurs, maxOccurs combinations which corresponds to the
standard DTD constructs +, *, and
?. Choices are represented using the standard DTD
construct |. All groups are represented using the
& notation.
Representation of anonymous types. To clarify the semantics, the [XPath/XQuery] type system makes all anonymous types explicit.
Representation of XML Schema simple type facets and identity constraints. For simplicity, XML Schema simple type facets as well as indentity constraints are not formally represented in the [XPath/XQuery] type system. Still, [XPath/XQuery] implementation supporting XML Schema import and validation must follow the XML Schema specification and take simple type facets and indentity constraints into account.
The complete mapping from XML Schema into the [XPath/XQuery] type system is given in [8 Importing Schemas]. The rest of this section is organized as follows. [2.3.2 Item types] describes types items, [2.3.3 Content models] describes content models, and [2.3.4 Top level definitions] describe top-level type declarations.
An item type is either an atomic type, an element type, an attribute type, a document node type, a text node type, a comment node type, or a processing instruction type.
| [30 (Formal)] | ItemType | ::= | AtomicTypeName | NodeType |
| [32 (Formal)] | AtomicTypeName | ::= | QName |
| [31 (Formal)] | NodeType | ::= | ElementType |
| [33 (Formal)] | ElementType | ::= | "element" ElementName? TypeSpecifier? |
| [34 (Formal)] | TypeSpecifier | ::= | Nillable? TypeReference |
| [35 (Formal)] | AttributeType | ::= | "attribute" AttributeName? TypeReference? |
| [36 (Formal)] | Nillable | ::= | "nillable" |
| [40 (Formal)] | TypeReference | ::= | "of" "type" TypeName |
| [51 (Formal)] | DocumentType | ::= | "document" ("{" Type? "}")? |
An element or attribute type has an optional name and an optional type reference. A name alone corresponds to a reference to a global element or attribute declaration. A name with a type reference corresponds to a local element or attribute declaration. The word "element" or "attribute" alone refers to the wildcard types any element or any attribute. In addition, an element type has an optional nillable flag which indicates whether the element can be nilled or not.
A document type has an optional content type. If no content type is given, then it refers to the wildcard type describing any document.
Note
Note that generic node types (e.g., node()),
are interpreted in the type system as union types (e.g.,
element | attribute | text | comment |
processing-instruction) and therefore do not appear
here. The semantics of sequence types is described in [3.4.1.1 SequenceType Matching].
Examples
A text node type
text
matches any text node, such as:
text { "Text is beautiful" }
A wildcard element
element
matches any element.
A wildcard element of type string
element of type xs:integer
matches any element of type string, such as:
element name of type xs:string { "John Doe" }
A nillable element of type string
element size nillable of type xs:integer
matches any element with name size of type
xs:integer, such as:
element size of type xs:integer {
2 of type xs:integer
}
or it matches any element with name size which
has no content and the xsi:nil attribute set to
true, such as:
element size of type xs:integer {
attribute xsi:nil of type xs:anySimpleType { "true" }
}
A reference to a globally declared attribute
attribute sizes
refers to the global declaration for the attribute
sizes.
An element with an anonymous type
element sizes of type [Anon1]
matches any element with name sizes and the
anonymous type [Anon1], such as:
element sizes of type [Anon1] {
1 of type xs:integer,
2 of type xs:integer,
3 of type xs:integer
}
Following XML Schema, types in [XPath/XQuery] are composed from
item types by optional, one or more, zero or more, all group,
sequence, choice, empty sequence, or empty choice (written
none).
The type empty matches the empty sequence. The type
none matches no values. It is called the empty
choice because it is the identity for choice, that is
(Type | none) =
Type)). The type none is the static type
for [6.2.1 The fn:error function].
| [28 (Formal)] | Type | ::= | ItemType |
| [29 (Formal)] | Occurrence | ::= | "*" | "+" | "?" |
The [XPath/XQuery] type system includes three binary operators on types: ",", "|" and "&", corresponding respectively to sequence, choice and all groups in Schema. The [XPath/XQuery] type system includes three unary operators on types: "*", "+", and "?", corresponding respectively to zero or more instances of the type, one or more instances of the type, or an optional instance of the type.
The "&" operator builds the "interleaved
product" of two types. The type Type1
& Type2 matches any sequence that is an
interleaving of a sequence that matches Type1 and a
sequence that matches Type2.
The interleaved product is used to represent all groups in XML Schema. All group in XML Schema are restricted to apply only on global or local element declarations with lower bound 0 or 1, and upper bound 1.
Examples
A sequence of elements
The "," operator builds the "sequence" of two types. For example,
element title of type xs:string, element year of type xs:integer
is a sequence of an element title of type string followed by an element year of type integer.
The union of two element types
The "|" operator builds the "union" of two types. For example,
element editor of type xs:string | element bib:author
means either an element editor of type string, or a
reference to the gobal element bib:author.
An all group of two elements
The "&" operator builds the "interleaved product" of two types. For example,
(element a & element b) =
element a, element b
| element b, element a
which specifies that the a and b
elements can occur in any order.
An empty type
The following type matches the empty sequence.
empty
A sequence of zero or more elements
The following type matches zero or more elements each of
which can be a surgeon or a
plumber.
(element surgeon | element plumber)*
Top level definitions correspond to global element declarations, global attribute declarations and type definitions in XML Schema.
| [43 (Formal)] | Definition | ::= | ("define" "element" ElementName Substitution? Nillable? TypeReference) |
| [44 (Formal)] | Substitution | ::= | "substitutes" "for" ElementName |
| [37 (Formal)] | TypeDerivation | ::= | ComplexTypeDerivation | AtomicTypeDerivation |
| [38 (Formal)] | ComplexTypeDerivation | ::= | Derivation? Mixed? "{" Type? "}" |
| [39 (Formal)] | AtomicTypeDerivation | ::= | "restricts" AtomicTypeName |
| [41 (Formal)] | Derivation | ::= | ("restricts" TypeName) |
| [42 (Formal)] | Mixed | ::= | "mixed" |
A type definition has a name (possibly anonymous) and a type derivation. In the case of a complex type, or a simple type derived by list or uniont, derivation indicates if the type is derived by extension or restriction from its based type, gives its content model, and an optional flag indicating if it has mixed content. In the case of an atomic type, it just indicate from which type it is derived from.
A type is derived either by extension or restriction from a
base type. In case the type derivation is omitted, the type
derives by restriction from xs:anyType, as in:
define type Bib { xs:integer } =
define type Bib restricts xs:anyType { xs:integer }
Empty content can be indicated with the explicit empty sequence, or omitted, as in:
define type Bib { } =
define type Bib { empty }
Global element and attribute declarations have always a name, and a reference to a (possibly anonymous) type. In addition, a global element declaration may declare a substitution group for the element and whether the element is nillable.
Examples
A type declaration with complex content
define type Address {
element name of type xsd:string,
element street of type xsd:string*
}
A type declaration with complex content derived by extension
define type USAddress extends Address {
element zip name of type xsd:integer
}
A type declaration with mixed content
define type Section mixed {
(element h1 of type xsd:string |
element p of type xsd:string |
element div of type Section)*
}
A type declaration with simple content derived by restriction
define type SKU restricts xsd:string { xsd:string }
An element declaration
define element address of type Address
An element declaration with a substitution group
define element usaddress substitutes for address of type USAddress
An element declaration which is nillable
define element zip nillable of type xs:integer
Here is a schema describing purchase orders, taken from the XML Schema Primer, followed by its mapping into the [XPath/XQuery] type system. The complete mapping from XML Schema into the [XPath/XQuery] type system is given in [8 Importing Schemas].
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:annotation>
<xsd:documentation xml:lang="en">
Purchase order schema for Example.com.
Copyright 2000 Example.com. All rights reserved.
</xsd:documentation>
</xsd:annotation>
<xsd:element name="purchaseOrder" type="PurchaseOrderType"/>
<xsd:element name="comment" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:complexType name="PurchaseOrderType">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="shipTo" type="USAddress"/>
<xsd:element name="billTo" type="USAddress"/>
<xsd:element ref="comment" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element name="items" type="Items"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="orderDate" type="xsd:date"/>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="USAddress">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="name" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="street" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="city" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="state" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="zip" type="xsd:decimal"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="country" type="xsd:NMTOKEN"
fixed="US"/>
</xsd:complexType>
<xsd:complexType name="Items">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="item" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="productName" type="xsd:string"/>
<xsd:element name="quantity">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:positiveInteger">
<xsd:maxExclusive value="100"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="USPrice" type="xsd:decimal"/>
<xsd:element ref="comment" minOccurs="0"/>
<xsd:element name="shipDate" type="xsd:date" minOccurs="0"/>
</xsd:sequence>
<xsd:attribute name="partNum" type="SKU" use="required"/>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
<!-- Stock Keeping Unit, a code for identifying products -->
<xsd:simpleType name="SKU">
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:pattern value="\d{3}-[A-Z]{2}"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:schema>
namespace xsd = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
define element purchaseOrder of type ipo:PurchaseOrderType
define element comment of type xsd:string
define type PurchaseOrderType {
attribute orderDate of type xsd:date?,
element shipTo of type USAddress,
element billTo of type USAddress,
element ipo:comment?,
element items of type Items
}
define type USAddress {
attribute country of type xsd:NMTOKEN?,
element name of type xsd:string,
element street of type xsd:string,
element city of type xsd:string,
element state of type xsd:string,
element zip of type xsd:decimal
}
define type Items {
attribute partNum of type SKU,
element item of type [Anon1]*
}
define type [Anon1] {
element productName of type xsd:string,
element quantity of type [Anon2],
element USPrice of type xsd:decimal,
element comment?,
element shipDate of type xsd:date?
}
define type [Anon2] restricts xsd:positiveInteger { xsd:positiveInteger }
define type SKU restrict xsd:string { xsd:string }
Note the way the two anonymous types inside the
item element are handled by giving them anonymous
names [Anon1] and [Anon2].
The following additional definitions illustrate how more advanced XML Schema features (a complex type derived by extension, an anonymous simple type derived by restriction, and substitution groups) are represented in the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
<complexType name="NYCAddress">
<complexContent>
<extension base="USAddress">
<sequence>
<element ref="apt"/>
</sequence>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
<element name="apt"/>
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:positiveInteger">
<xsd:maxExclusive value="10000"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
<element>
<element name="usaddress" substitutionGroup="address" type="USAddress"/>
<element name="nycaddress" substitutionGroup="usaddress" type="NYCAddress"/>
Those definitions are written in the [XPath/XQuery] type system as follows.
define type NYCAddress extends USAddress {
element apt
}
define element apt of type [Anon3]
define type [Anon3] restricts xsd:positiveInteger
define element usaddress substitutes for address of type USAddress
define element nycaddress substitutes for usaddress of type NYCAddress
This section defines a processing model for [XPath/XQuery], then defines formal judgments for each key phase in that processing model (normalization, static type analysis and dynamic evaluation).
This processing model is not intended to describe an actual implementation, although a naive implementation might be based upon it. It does not prescribe an implementation technique, but any implementation should produce the same results as obtained by following this processing model and applying the rest of the Formal Semantics specification.
The processing model consists of five phases; each phase consumes the result of the previous phase and generates output for the next phase. For each processing phase, we point to the relevant notations introduced later in the document.
Parsing. The grammar for the [XPath/XQuery] syntax is defined in [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML]. Parsing may generate syntax errors. If no error occurs, an internal abstract syntax tree of the parsed query is created.
Context Processing. The semantics of [expression/query] depends on the input context. The input context needs to be generated before the [expression/query] can be processed. In XQuery, the input context may be defined by the processing environment and by statements in the Query Prolog (See [5 Modules and Prologs]). In XPath, the input context is defined by the processing environment. The input context has a static and a dynamic part (denoted statEnv and dynEnv, respectively).
Normalization. To
simplify the semantics specification, some normalization is
performed on the [expression/query]. The [XPath/XQuery] language
provides many powerful features that make [expression/query]s
simpler to write and use, but are also redundant. For
instance, a complex for expression might be
rewritten as a composition of several simple
for expressions. The language composed of these
simpler [expression/query] is called the [XPath/XQuery] Core
language and is described by a grammar which is a
subset of the XQuery grammar. The grammar of the [XPath/XQuery]
Core language is given in [A Normalized core grammar].
During the normalization phase, each [XPath/XQuery] [expression/query] is mapped into its equivalent [expression/query] in the core. (Note that this has nothing to do with Unicode Normalization, which works on character strings.) Normalization works by bottom-up application of normalization rules over expressions, starting with normalization of literal expressions and variables.
Specifically the normalization phase is defined in terms of the static part of the context (statEnv) and a [expression/query] (Expr) abstract syntax tree. Formal notations for the normalization phase are introduced in [2.4.2 Normalization judgment].
After normalization, the full semantics is obtained by giving a semantics to the normalized Core [expression/query]. This is done during the last two phases.
Static type analysis. Static type analysis is optional. If this phase is not supported, then normalization is followed directly by dynamic evaluation.
Static type analysis checks whether each [expression/query] is type safe, and if so, determines its static type. Static type analysis is defined only for Core [expression/query]. Static type analysis works by bottom-up application of type inference rules over expressions, taking the type of literals and of input documents into account.
If the [expression/query] is not type-safe, static type analysis yields a type error. For instance, a comparison between an integer value and a string value might be detected as an type error during the static type analysis. If static type analysis succeeds, it yields an abstract syntax tree where each sub-expression is "annotated" with its static type
More precisely, the static analysis phase is defined in terms of the static context (statEnv) and a core [expression/query] (CoreExpr). Formal notations for the static analysis phase are introduced in [2.4.3 Static typing judgment].
Static typing does not imply that the content of XML documents must be rigidly fixed or even known in advance. The [XPath/XQuery] type system accommodates "flexible" types, such as elements that can contain any content. Schema-less documents are handled in [XPath/XQuery] by associating a standard type with the document, such that it may include any legal XML content.
Dynamic Evaluation. This phase computes the value of an [expression/query]. The semantics of evaluation is defined only for Core [expression/query] terms. Evaluation works by bottom-up application of evaluation rules over expressions, starting with evaluation of literals and variables. Evaluation may result in a value OR a dynamic error, which may be a non-type error or a type error. If static typing of an expression does not raise a type error, then dynamic evaluation of the same expression will not raise a type error, although dynamic evaluation may raise some non-type error.
The dynamic evaluation phase is defined in terms of the static context (statEnv) and evaluation context (dynEnv), and a core [expression/query] (CoreExpr). Formal notations for the dynamic evaluation phase are introduced in [2.4.4 Dynamic evaluation judgment].
The first four phases above are "analysis-time" (sometimes also called "compile-time") steps, meaning that they can be performed on a [expression/query] before examining any input document. Indeed, analysis-time processing can be performed before input documents even exist. Analysis-time processing can detect many errors early-on, e.g., syntax errors or type errors. If no error occurs, the result of analysis-time processing could be some compiled form of [expression/query], suitable for execution by a compiled-[expression/query] processor. The last phase is an "execution-time" (sometimes also called "run-time") step, meaning that the query is evaluated on actual input document(s).
Static analysis catches only certain classes of errors. For
instance, it can detect a comparison operation applied between
incompatible types (e.g., xs:int and
xs:date). Some other classes of errors cannot be
detected by the static analysis and are only detected at
execution time. For instance, whether an arithmetic expression
on 32 bits integers (xs:int) yields an out-of-bound
value can only be detected at run-time by looking at the
data.
While implementations are free to implement different processing models, the [XPath/XQuery] static semantics relies on the existence of a static type analysis phase that precedes any access to the input data. Statically typed implementations are required to find and report type errors during static analysis, as specified in this document. Dynamically typed implementations are required to find and report type errors during evaluation, but are permitted to report them during static analysis.
Notice that the separation of logical processing into phases is not meant to imply that implementations must separate analysis-time from evaluation-time processing: [XPath/XQuery] processors may choose to perform all phases simultaneously at evaluation-time and may even mix the phases in their internal implementations. The processing model simply defines the final result.
The above processing phases are all internal to the [XPath/XQuery] processor. They do not deal with how the [XPath/XQuery] processor interacts with the outside world, notably how it accesses actual documents and types. A typical [expression/query] engine would support at least three other important processing phases:
XML Schema import phase. The [XPath/XQuery] type system is based on XML Schema. In order to perform dynamic or static typing, the [XPath/XQuery] processor needs to build type descriptions that correspond to the schema(s) of the input documents. This phase is achieved by mapping all schemas required by the [expression/query] into the [XPath/XQuery] type system. The XML Schema import phase is described in [8 Importing Schemas].
XML loading phase. Expressions are evaluated on values in the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model]. XML documents must be loaded into the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model] before the evaluation phase. This is described in the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model] and is not discussed further here.
Serialization phase. Once the [expression/query] is evaluated, processors might want to serialize the result of the [expression/query] as actual XML documents. Serialization of data model instances is described in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model Serialization] and is not discussed further here.
The parsing phase is not specified formally; the formal semantics does not define a formal model for the syntax trees, but uses the [XPath/XQuery] concrete syntax directly. More details about parsing for XQuery 1.0 can be found in the [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] document and more details about parsing for XPath 2.0 can be found in the [XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0] document. No further discussion of parsing is included here.
Normalization is specified using mapping rules which describe how a [XPath/XQuery] expression is rewritten into an expression in the [XPath/XQuery] Core. Mapping rules are also used in [8 Importing Schemas] to specify how XML Schemas are imported into the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
Notation
Mapping rules are written using a square bracket notation, as follows:
| [Object]Subscript |
| == |
| Mapped Object |
The original "object" is written above the == sign. The rewritten "object" is written beneath the == sign. The subscript is used to indicate what kind of "object" is mapped, and sometimes to pass some information between mapping rules.
(Since normalization is always done in the context of the static context the above is really a shorthand for
We use the shorthand because statEnv is always implied.)
The static environment is used in certain cases (e.g. for normalization of function calls) during normalization. To keep the notation simpler, the static environment is not written in the normalization rules, but it is assumed to be available.
| Editorial note | |
| [Kristoffer/XSL] We should decide whether to use a shorthand notation as suggested or modify the mapping rules throughout. | |
The normalization rule that is used to map "top-level" expressions in the [XPath/XQuery] syntax into expressions in the [XPath/XQuery] Core is:
| [Expr]Expr |
| == |
| CoreExpr |
which indicates that the expression Expr is normalized to the expression CoreExpr in the [XPath/XQuery] core (with the implied statEnv).
Example
For instance, the following [expression/query]
for $i in (1, 2),
$j in (3, 4)
return
element pair { ($i,$j) }
is normalized to the core expression
for $i in (1, 2) return
for $j in (3, 4) return
return
element pair { ($i,$j) }
in which the complex "FWLR" expression is mapped into a composition of two simpler "for" expressions.
The static semantics is specified using type inference rules, which relate [XPath/XQuery] expressions to types and specify under what conditions an expression is well typed.
Notation
The judgment
holds when, in the static environment statEnv, the expression Expr has type Type.
Example
The result of static type inference is to associate a static type with every [expression/query], such that any evaluation of that [expression/query] is guaranteed to yield a value that belongs to that type.
For instance, the following expression.
let $v := 3 return $v+5
has type xs:integer. This can be inferred as follows: the
input literals '3' and '5' have type integer, so the variable
$v also has type integer. Since the sum of two integers is an
integer, the complete expression has type integer.
Note
The type of an expression is computed by inference. Static type inference rules define for each kind of expression how to compute the type of the expression given the types of its sub-expressions. Here is a simple example of such a static typing rule:
statEnv |-
Expr1 : xs:boolean
statEnv |-
Expr2 : Type2
statEnv |-
Expr3 : Type3
|
statEnv |-
if Expr1
then Expr2
else Expr3
: ( Type2 | Type3 )
|
This rule states that if the conditional expression of an "if" expression has type boolean, then the type of the entire expression is one of the two types of its "then" and "else" clauses. Note that the resulting type is represented as a union: '(Type2|Type3)'.
The "left half" (the part before the :) of the expression below the line corresponds to some [expression/query], for which a type is computed. If the [expression/query] has been parsed into an internal abstract syntax tree, this usually corresponds to some node in that tree. The expression usually has patterns in it (here Expr1, Expr2, and Expr3) that need to be matched against the children of the node in the abstract syntax tree. The expressions above the line indicate things that need to be computed to use this rule; in this case, the types of the condition expression and the two branches of the if-then-else expression. Once those types are computed (by further applying static inference rules recursively to the expressions on each side), then the type of the expression below the line can be computed. This illustrates a general feature of the [XPath/XQuery] type system: the type of an expression depends only on the type of its sub-expressions. The overall static type inference algorithm is recursive, following the abstract syntax of the [expression/query]. At each point in the recursion, an appropriate matching inference rule is sought; if at any point there is no applicable rule, then static type inference has failed and the [expression/query] is not type-safe.
The dynamic, or operational, semantics is specified using value inference rules, which relate [XPath/XQuery] expressions to values, and in some cases specify the order in which an [XPath/XQuery] expression is evaluated.
Notation
The judgment
holds when, in the static environment statEnv and dynamic environment dynEnv, the expression Expr yields the value Value.
The judgment
holds when, in the static environment statEnv and dynamic environment dynEnv, the expression Expr raises the error Error.
The static environment is used in certain cases (e.g. for type matching) during evaluation. To keep the notation simpler, the static environment is not written in the dynamic inference rules, but it is assumed to be available.
Example
For instance, the following expression.
let $v := 3 return $v+5
yields the integer value 8. This can be inferred as follows: the input literals '3' and '5' denote the values 3 and 5, respectively, so the variable $v has the value 3. Since the sum of 3 and 5 is 8, the complete expression has the value 8.
Note
As with static type inference, logical inference rules are used to determine the value of each expression, given the dynamic environment and the values of its sub-expressions.
The inference rules used for dynamic evaluation, like those for static type inference, follow a bottom-up recursive structure, computing the value of expressions from the values of their sub-expressions.
Whenever appropriate, the Formal Semantics uses the following namespace prefixes.
fn: for functions and operators from the
[XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] document.
xs: for XML Schema components, and
built-in types.
xdt: for XML Schema components, and
built-in types.
All these prefixes are assumed to be bound to the appropriate URIs.
In addition, the Formal Semantics uses the following special prefixes for the means of specification.
dm: for accessors of the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model].
op: for operators in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
fs: for functions and types defined in the formal semantics.
Those prefixes are always shown in italics to emphasize that the corresponding functions, variables, and types are abstract: they are not and cannot be made accessible directly from the host language. None of those special prefixes are given a URI.
The [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] document defines built-in functions available in [XPath/XQuery]. A number of these functions are used to define the [XPath/XQuery] semantics. The list of functions from the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] document that are used in the [XPath/XQuery] Formal Semantics is given in [B.1 Functions and Operators used in the Formal Semantics].
Many functions in the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] document are
generic: they perform operations on arbitrary
components of the data model, e.g., any kind of node, or any
sequence of items. For instance, the
fn:distinct-nodes function removes duplicates in
any sequence of nodes. As a result, the signature given in the
[XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] document is also generic. For instance, the
signature of the fn:distinct-nodes function is:
fn:distinct-nodes(node*) as node*
Applied directly, this signature results in little type
information. For such functions, better type information can
often be obtained by having the output type depend on the type
of input parameters. For instance, if the function
fn:distinct-nodes is applied on a parameter of type
element a*, element b, one can easily deduce that
the resulting sequence is a collection of either a
or b elements.
In order to provide better static typing for those functions, specific typing rules are given in [6 Additional Semantics of Functions].
The organization of this section parallels the organization of Section 2 of the [XPath/XQuery] document.
Introduction
The expression context for a given expression consists of all the information that can affect the result of the expression. This information is organized into the static context and the evaluation context. This section specifies the environments that represent the context information used by [XPath/XQuery] expressions.
The environment group statEnv denotes the environments that are available during static analysis. Static analysis may extend parts of the static environment. The static environment is also available during dynamic evaluation.
The following environments are part of the static environment group:
| statEnv.xpath1.0_compatibility |
| ||||
| statEnv.namespace |
| ||||
| statEnv.default_type_namespace |
| ||||
| statEnv.default_function_namespace |
| ||||
| statEnv.typeDefn |
| ||||
| statEnv.elemDecl |
| ||||
| statEnv.attrDecl |
| ||||
| statEnv.varType |
| ||||
| statEnv.localElemDecl |
| ||||
| statEnv.localAttrDecl |
| ||||
| statEnv.funcType |
| ||||
| statEnv.collations |
| ||||
| statEnv.defaultCollation |
| ||||
| statEnv.validationMode |
| ||||
| statEnv.validationContext |
| ||||
| statEnv.baseUri |
| ||||
| statEnv.collectionType |
| ||||
| statEnv.docType |
|
Environments have an initial state when [expression/query] processing begins, containing, for example, the function signatures of all built-in functions. The initial values for the static context are defined in [XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, section C Context Components] and [XML Path Language (XPath), section C Context Components].
A common use of the static environment is to expand QNames by looking up namespace prefixes in the statEnv.namespace environment.
The helper function fs:expand
expands QNames by looking up the namespace prefix in
statEnv.namespace. This function is defined as follows:
statEnv |-
fs:expand(QName) = ExpandedQName(URI,
ncname)
or
statEnv |-
fs:expand(QName) = ExpandedQName(ncname)
the right hand side is a QName value (not a QName expression).
The helper fs:expand function is defined as
follows:
If QName matches
NCName1:NCName2, and if
statEnv.namespace(NCName1) = (kind, URI), then the expression
yields ExpandedQName(URI,NCName2). If the namespace
prefix NCName1 is not found in statEnv.namespace, then the
expression does not apply (that is, the inference rule will
not match).
If QName matches NCName, NCName is an element or type name, and statEnv.default_type_namespace = URI, then the expression yields ExpandedQName(URI,NCName), where URI is the default namespace in effect.
If QName matches NCName, NCName is a function name, and statEnv.default_function_namespace = URI, then the expression yields ExpandedQName(URI,NCName), where URI is the default namespace in effect.
| Editorial note | |
The above rules could be given as proper inference
rules defining the fs:expand
judgment. | |
Here is an example that shows how the static environment is modified in response to a namespace definition.
| ||
statEnv |-
declare namespace NCName = URI Expr*
|
This rule reads as follows: "the phrase on the bottom (a namespace declaration in the query prolog followed by a sequence of expressions) is well-typed (accepted by the static type inference rules) within an environment statEnv if the sequence of expressions above the line is well-typed in the environment obtained from statEnv by adding the namespace declaration".
This is the common idiom for passing new information in an environment using sub-expressions. In the case where the environment must be updated with a completely new component, the following notation is used:
statEnv [ namespace = (NewEnvironment) ]The helper function fs:active_ns(statEnv) returns
all the active in-scope namespaces in the given static environment.
For each attribute and element node in
Value, such that the node has
name ExpandedQName in the namespace URI, the helper function
fs:get_ns_from_items(statEnv, Value) returns
the in-scope namespace that corresponds to URI. This is a
reverse-lookup on statEnv.namespace by URI.
All the built-in types of XML Schema are recognized by
[XPath/XQuery]. In addition, [XPath/XQuery] recognizes the predefined
types: xdt:anyAtomicType, xdt:untypedAtomic,
xdt:yearMonthDuration, xdt:dayTimeDuration. The
representation of those types in the [XPath/XQuery] type system is
given below.
[Definition: The following type
definition of xs:anyTypereflects the semantics of the Ur type from Schema in
the [XPath/XQuery] type system.]
define type xs:anyType restricts xs:anyType {
attribute*,
( xdt:anyAtomicType* |
( element? & text? & comment? & processing-instruction? )* )
}
[Definition: The following type
definition of xs:anySimpleTypereflects the semantics of the Ur simple type from
Schema in the [XPath/XQuery] type system.]
define type xs:anySimpleType restricts xs:anyType {
( xs:string
| xs:boolean
| xs:decimal
| xs:float
| xs:double
| xs:duration
| xs:dateTime
| xs:time
| xs:date
| xs:gYearMonth
| xs:gYear
| xs:gMonthDay
| xs:gDay
| xs:gMonth
| xs:hexBinary
| xs:base64Binary
| xs:anyURI
| xs:QName
| xs:NOTATION )*
}
The name of the Ur simple type is
xs:anySimpleType. It is derived by restriction from
xs:anyType, its content is given by the union of
all primitive atomic types.
[Definition: The following type
definition of xdt:anyAtomicTypereflects the semantics of xdt:anyAtomicType in the
[XPath/XQuery] type system.]
define type xdt:anyAtomicType restricts xs:anySimpleType {
( xs:string
| xs:boolean
| xs:decimal
| xs:float
| xs:double
| xs:duration
| xs:dateTime
| xs:time
| xs:date
| xs:gYearMonth
| xs:gYear
| xs:gMonthDay
| xs:gDay
| xs:gMonth
| xs:hexBinary
| xs:base64Binary
| xs:anyURI
| xs:QName
| xs:NOTATION
| xdt:untypedAtomic)
}
[Definition: The following type definitions of the XML Schema primitive types reflects the semantics of the primitive types from Schema in the [XPath/XQuery] type system.]
define type xs:string restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:boolean restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:decimal restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:float restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:double restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:duration restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:dateTime restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:time restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:date restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:gYearMonth restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:gYear restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:gMonthDay restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:gDay restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:gMonth restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:hexBinary restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:base64Binary restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:anyURI restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:QName restricts xdt:anyAtomicType define type xs:NOTATION restricts xdt:anyAtomicType
All of those primitive types derive from
xdt:anyAtomicType. Note that the value space of each atomic
type (such as xs:string) does not appear. The value space for
each type is built-in and is as defined in [XML Schema Part 2].
[Definition: The
type xdt:untypedAtomic is defined as follows.]
define type xdt:untypedAtomic restricts xdt:anyAtomicType
Note that this rule does not indicate the value space of
xdt:untypedAtomic. By definition, xdt:untypedAtomic has the
same value space as xs:string.
The following example shows two atomic values. The first one is a value of type string containing "Database". The second one is an untyped value containing "Database". Both are using a string as content, but they have different type annotations.
"Databases" of type xs:string "Databases" of type xdt:untypedAtomic
[Definition: The following type definitions of the XML Schema derived types reflects the semantics of the XML Schema types derived types derived by restriction from another atomic type.]
define type xs:normalizedString restricts xs:string define type xs:token restricts xs:normalizedString define type xs:language restricts xs:token define type xs:NMTOKEN restricts xs:token define type xs:Name restricts xs:token define type xs:NCName restricts xs:Name define type xs:ID restricts xs:Name define type xs:IDREF restricts xs:Name define type xs:ENTITY restricts xs:Name define type xs:integer restricts xs:decimal define type xs:nonPositiveInteger restricts xs:integer define type xs:negativeInteger restricts xs:nonPositiveInteger define type xs:long restricts xs:integer define type xs:int restricts xs:long define type xs:short restricts xs:int define type xs:byte restricts xs:short define type xs:nonNegativeInteger restricts xs:integer define type xs:unsignedLong restricts xs:nonNegativeInteger define type xs:unsignedInt restricts xs:unsignedLong define type xs:unsignedShort restricts xs:unsignedInt define type xs:unsignedByte restricts xs:unsignedShort define type xs:positiveInteger restricts xs:nonNegativeInteger
Three XML Schema built-in derived types are derived by list,
as follows. Note that those derive directly from
xs:anySimpleType, since they are derived by list, and that
their value space is define using a "one or more"
occurrence indicator.
define type xs:NMTOKENS restricts xs:anySimpleType { xs:NMTOKEN+ }
define type xs:IDREFS restricts xs:anySimpleType { xs:IDREF+ }
define type xs:ENTITIES restricts xs:anySimpleType { xs:ENTITY+ }
For example, here is an element whose content is of type
xs:IDREFS.
element a of type xs:IDREFS {
"id1" of type xs:IDREF,
"id2" of type xs:IDREF,
"id3" of type xs:IDREF
}
Note that the type name xs:IDREFS derives from
xs:anySimpleType, but not from xs:IDREF. As a consequence,
calling the following three XQuery functions with that element
a as a parameter succeeds in the case of
f1 and f2, but raises a typing error
in the case of f3.
define function f1($x as element(*,xs:anySimpleType)) { $x }
define function f2($x as element(*,xs:IDREFS)) { $x }
define function f3($x as element(*,xs:IDREF)) { $x }
[Definition: The totally ordered duration types, xdt:yearMonthDuration and
xdt:dayTimeDuration, are derived by restriction from
xs:duration.]
define type xdt:yearMonthDuration restricts xs:duration define type xdt:dayTimeDuration restricts xs:duration
The environment group dynEnv denotes the group of environments built and used during dynamic evaluation.
The following environments are part of evaluation environment group:
| dynEnv.funcDefn |
| |||||
| dynEnv.varValue |
| |||||
| dynEnv.dateTime |
| |||||
| dynEnv.timezone |
|
The initial values for the dynamic context are defined in [XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language, section C Context Components] and [XML Path Language (XPath), section C Context Components].
The following Formal Semantics built-in variables represent the context item, context position, and context size properties of the evaluation context:
| Built-in Variable | Represents: |
$fs:dot | context item |
$fs:position | context position |
$fs:last | context size |
Variables with the "fs" namespace prefix are reserved for use in the definition of the Formal Semantics. It is a static error to define a variable in the "fs" namespace.
Values of $fs:dot, $fs:position and $fs:last can be
obtained by invoking the fn:context-item(),
fn:position() and fn:last() functions,
respectively.
A simplified version of the processing model, used as the basis for formalization is given in [2.4 Processing model and main judgments].
Document order is defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model].
Document order is defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model] and [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
[XPath/XQuery] has a set of functions that provide access to input data. These functions are of particular importance because they provide a way in which an expression can reference a document or a collection of documents. The dynamic semantics of these three input functions are described in more detail in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
Introduction
SequenceTypes can be used in [XPath/XQuery] to refer to a type imported from a schema (see [5 Modules and Prologs]). SequenceTypes are used to declare the types of function parameters and in several kinds of [XPath/XQuery] expressions.
The syntax of SequenceTypes is described by the following grammar productions.
| [124 (XQuery)] | SequenceType | ::= | (ItemType OccurrenceIndicator?) |
| [140 (XQuery)] | OccurrenceIndicator | ::= | "?" | "*" | "+" |
| [126 (XQuery)] | ItemType | ::= | AtomicType | KindTest | ("item" "(" ")") |
| [125 (XQuery)] | AtomicType | ::= | QName |
| [127 (XQuery)] | KindTest | ::= | DocumentTest |
| [130 (XQuery)] | PITest | ::= | "processing-instruction" "(" (NCName | StringLiteral)? ")" |
| [132 (XQuery)] | CommentTest | ::= | "comment" "(" ")" |
| [133 (XQuery)] | TextTest | ::= | "text" "(" ")" |
| [134 (XQuery)] | AnyKindTest | ::= | "node" "(" ")" |
| [131 (XQuery)] | DocumentTest | ::= | "document-node" "(" ElementTest? ")" |
| [128 (XQuery)] | ElementTest | ::= | "element" "(" ((SchemaContextPath LocalName) |
| [129 (XQuery)] | AttributeTest | ::= | "attribute" "(" ((SchemaContextPath "@" LocalName) |
| [135 (XQuery)] | SchemaContextPath | ::= | SchemaGlobalContext "/" (SchemaContextStep "/")* |
| [14 (XQuery)] | SchemaGlobalContext | ::= | QName | SchemaGlobalTypeName |
| [15 (XQuery)] | SchemaContextStep | ::= | QName |
| [13 (XQuery)] | SchemaGlobalTypeName | ::= | "type" "(" QName ")" |
| [137 (XQuery)] | LocalName | ::= | QName |
| [138 (XQuery)] | NodeName | ::= | QName | "*" |
| [139 (XQuery)] | TypeName | ::= | QName | "*" |
The semantics of SequenceTypes is defined by means of normalization rules from SequenceTypes to the [XPath/XQuery] type system (see [2.3 The [XPath/XQuery] Type System]).
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for sequence types are:
| [85 (Core)] | SequenceType | ::= | (ItemType OccurrenceIndicator?) |
| [101 (Core)] | OccurrenceIndicator | ::= | "?" | "*" | "+" |
| [87 (Core)] | ItemType | ::= | AtomicType | KindTest | ("item" "(" ")") |
| [86 (Core)] | AtomicType | ::= | QName |
| [88 (Core)] | KindTest | ::= | DocumentTest |
| [91 (Core)] | PITest | ::= | "processing-instruction" "(" (NCName | StringLiteral)? ")" |
| [93 (Core)] | CommentTest | ::= | "comment" "(" ")" |
| [94 (Core)] | TextTest | ::= | "text" "(" ")" |
| [95 (Core)] | AnyKindTest | ::= | "node" "(" ")" |
| [92 (Core)] | DocumentTest | ::= | "document-node" "(" ElementTest? ")" |
| [89 (Core)] | ElementTest | ::= | "element" "(" ((SchemaContextPath LocalName) |
| [90 (Core)] | AttributeTest | ::= | "attribute" "(" ((SchemaContextPath "@" LocalName) |
| [96 (Core)] | SchemaContextPath | ::= | SchemaGlobalContext "/" (SchemaContextStep "/")* |
| [10 (Core)] | SchemaGlobalContext | ::= | QName | SchemaGlobalTypeName |
| [11 (Core)] | SchemaContextStep | ::= | QName |
| [9 (Core)] | SchemaGlobalTypeName | ::= | "type" "(" QName ")" |
| [98 (Core)] | LocalName | ::= | QName |
| [99 (Core)] | NodeName | ::= | QName | "*" |
| [100 (Core)] | TypeName | ::= | QName | "*" |
| Editorial note | |
| Note that normalization on SequenceTypes does not occur during the normalization phase but whenever a dynamic or static rule requires it. The reason for this deviation from the processing model is that the result of SequenceType normalization is not part of the [XPath/XQuery] syntax (See Issue 432 (FS-Issue-0089)). SequenceType normalization is the only occurrence of such a deviation in the formal semantics. | |
Introduction
During processing of a query, it is sometimes necessary to determine whether a given value matches a type that was declared using the SequenceType syntax. This process is known as SequenceType matching, and is formally specified in [7.4 Judgments for type matching].
Sequence type matching is defined between a value and a type, rules to normalize a sequence type to the [XPath/XQuery] type system are necessary.
Notation
To define normalization of SequenceTypes to the [XPath/XQuery] type system, the following auxiliary mapping rule is used.
| [SequenceType]sequencetype |
| == |
| Type |
specifies that SequenceType is mapped to Type, in the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
OccurenceIndicators are left unchanged when normalizing SequenceTypes into [XPath/XQuery] types. Each kind of SequenceType component is normalized separately into the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
| [ItemType OccurrenceIndicator]sequencetype |
| == |
| [ItemType]sequencetype OccurrenceIndicator |
The "empty" sequence type is mapped to the empty sequence type in the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
| [empty()]sequencetype |
| == |
| empty |
All of the KindTest SequenceType components are mapped directly into the [XPath/XQuery] type system.
| [element()]sequencetype |
| == |
| element |
| [element(*)]sequencetype |
| == |
| element |
| [element(*,*)]sequencetype |
| == |
| element |
| [attribute()]sequencetype |
| == |
| attribute |
| [attribute(@*)]sequencetype |
| == |
| attribute |
| [attribute(@*,*)]sequencetype |
| == |
| attribute |
The mapping still does not handle SequenceTypes using SchemaContext and nillable annotation (See Issue 481 (FS-Issue-0138)). The following rules map references to a global element or attribute, without taking the schema context or nillable into account.
| [element(ElementName)]sequencetype |
| == |
| element ElementName |
| [attribute(@AttributeName)]sequencetype |
| == |
| attribute AttributeName |
| [element(ElementName,TypeName)]sequencetype |
| == |
| element ElementName of type TypeName |
| [attribute(@AttributeName,TypeName)]sequencetype |
| == |
| attribute AttributeName of type TypeName |
| [element(ElementName,TypeName nillable)]sequencetype |
| == |
| element ElementName nillable of type TypeName |
Document nodes, text nodes, and atomic types are left unchanged.
| [text()]sequencetype |
| == |
| text |
| [document-node()]sequencetype |
| == |
| document |
| [document-node(ElementTest)]sequencetype |
| == |
| document { [ElementTest]sequencetype } |
| [AtomicType]sequencetype |
| == |
| AtomicType |
| [comment()]sequencetype |
| == |
| comment |
| [processing-instruction()]sequencetype |
| == |
| processing-instruction |
| [processing-instruction(String)]sequencetype |
| == |
| processing-instruction |
The SequenceType components "node()" and
"item()" correspond to wildcard
types. node() indicates that any node is
allowed and item() indicates that any node or
atomic value is allowed. The following mapping rules make
use of the corresponding wildcard types.
| [node()]sequencetype |
| == |
| (element | attribute | text | document | comment | processing-instruction) |
| [item()]sequencetype |
| == |
(element | attribute | text | document | comment |
processing-instruction | xdt:anyAtomicType )
|
| Editorial note | |
Jerome: The Formal Semantics makes use of
fs:numeric which is not in XML Schema. This
is necessary for the specification of some of XPath type
conversion rules. | |
Introduction
Some expressions do not require that their operands exactly match an expected type. For example, function parameters and returns expect a value of a particular type, but automatically perform certain type conversions, such as extraction of atomic values from nodes, promotion of numeric values, and implicit casting of untyped values. The conversion rules for function parameters and returns are discussed in [4.1.5 Function Calls]. Other operators that provide special conversion rules include arithmetic operators ([4.4 Arithmetic Expressions]), value comparisons ([4.5.1 Value Comparisons]), and general comparisons ([4.5.2 General Comparisons]).
Atomization converts an item sequence into a sequence of
atomic values and is implemented by the fn:data function.
Atomization is applied in contexts where an arbitrary sequence
of items is used where a sequence of atomic
values is expected.
If a sequence of items is encountered where a boolean value is
expected, the item sequence's effective boolean value is used. The
fn:boolean function returns the effective boolean value of an item
sequence.
The semantics of some functions (see [6 Additional Semantics of Functions]) depends on whether the XPath 1.0 backward compatibility flag is true or false.
Expressions can raise errors during static analysis or
dynamic evaluation. The [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML], and
[XML Path Language (XPath) 2.0] specify the conditions under which an expression or
operator raises an error. The user may raise an error
explicitly by calling the fn:error function, which takes an
optional item as an argument.
Notation
The symbol Error denotes any error. We distinguish between a static error, a type error, denoted by typeError, and a generic dynamic error, denoted by dynError, which represents all dynamic errors. A static error is raised during static analysis. A type error may be raised during static analysis or dynamic evaluation. A dynamic error is raised during dynamic evaluation. Non-type static errors are not formalized in this document.
| Editorial note | |
| We use a generic dynamic error, because the definition of all errors raised by functions and operators in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] is under discussion. | |
In general, when an error is raised during evaluation of some expression Expr, the error is propogated to the expression Expr1 in which Expr is evaluated. The expression Expr1, in turn, propogates the error to the expression in which Expr1 is evaluated, and so on, until the error is returned to the query environment.
Since most expressions propogate errors as described, we use one inference rule to specify this default behavior. The rule below states that if any sub-expression Expri of expression Expr raises an error dynError then Expr also raises dynError.
There are several expressions that do not propogate an error raised by some sub-expression. For each such expression, we give specific error inference rules.
| Editorial note | |
| Issue: Optional features and conformance levels are not formally specified. See Issue 512 (FS-Issue-0169). | |
The semantics of XML Schema import is described in [8 Importing Schemas].
The semantics of the static typing feature is described using static inference rules in the formal semantics.
The formal semantics of extensions is not specified.
| [1 (XQuery)] | Pragma | ::= | "(::" "pragma" QName PragmaContents* "::)" |
| [5 (XQuery)] | PragmaContents | ::= | Char |
This section gives the semantics of all the [XPath/XQuery] expressions. The organization of this section parallels the organization of Section 3 of the [XPath/XQuery] document.
| [40 (XQuery)] | Expr | ::= | ExprSingle ("," ExprSingle)* |
| [41 (XQuery)] | ExprSingle | ::= | FLWORExpr |
| [15 (XPath)] | XPath | ::= | Expr? |
For each expression, a short description and the relevant grammar productions are given. The semantics of an expression includes the normalization, static analysis, and dynamic evaluation phases. Recall that normalization rules translate [XPath/XQuery] syntax into core [XPath/XQuery] syntax. In the sections that contain normalization rules, the Core grammar productions into which the expression is normalized are also provided. After normalization, sections on static type inference and dynamic evaluation define the static type and dynamic value for the core expression.
Core Grammar
The core grammar production for expressions is:
| [31 (Core)] | Expr | ::= | ExprSingle ("," ExprSingle)* |
It is a static error for any expression other than
the empty-sequence expression () to have the empty
type. The rule below
enforces the constraint that any expression other than
() have a non-empty type. The static typing rule for
() is in [4.1.3 Parenthesized Expressions].
Primary expressions are the basic primitives of the language.They include literals, variables, function calls, and the parenthesized expressions.
| [75 (XQuery)] | PrimaryExpr | ::= | Literal | FunctionCall | ContextItemExpr | ("$" VarName) | ParenthesizedExpr | Constructor |
| [20 (XQuery)] | VarName | ::= | QName |
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for primary expressions are:
| [47 (Core)] | PrimaryExpr | ::= | Literal | FunctionCall | ContextItemExpr | ("$" VarName) | ParenthesizedExpr | Constructor |
| [15 (Core)] | VarName | ::= | QName |
Introduction
A literal is a direct syntactic representation of an atomic value. [XPath/XQuery] supports two kinds of literals: string literals and numeric literals.
| [93 (XQuery)] | Literal | ::= | NumericLiteral | StringLiteral |
| [94 (XQuery)] | NumericLiteral | ::= | IntegerLiteral | DecimalLiteral | DoubleLiteral |
| [7 (XQuery)] | IntegerLiteral | ::= | Digits |
| [8 (XQuery)] | DecimalLiteral | ::= | ("." Digits) | (Digits "." [0-9]*) |
| [9 (XQuery)] | DoubleLiteral | ::= | (("." Digits) | (Digits ("." [0-9]*)?)) ("e" | "E") ("+" | "-")? Digits |
| [10 (XQuery)] | StringLiteral | ::= | ('"' (PredefinedEntityRef | CharRef | ('"' '"') | [^"&])* '"') | ("'" (PredefinedEntityRef | CharRef | ("'" "'") | [^'&])* "'") |
| [22 (XQuery)] | PredefinedEntityRef | ::= | "&" ("lt" | "gt" | "amp" | "quot" | "apos") ";" |
| [24 (XQuery)] | CharRef | ::= | "&#" (Digits | ("x" HexDigits)) ";" |
All literals are core expressions, therefore no normalization rules are required for literals.
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for literals are:
| [59 (Core)] | Literal | ::= | NumericLiteral | StringLiteral |
| [60 (Core)] | NumericLiteral | ::= | IntegerLiteral | DecimalLiteral | DoubleLiteral |
| [3 (Core)] | IntegerLiteral | ::= | Digits |
| [4 (Core)] | DecimalLiteral | ::= | ("." Digits) | (Digits "." [0-9]*) |
| [5 (Core)] | DoubleLiteral | ::= | (("." Digits) | (Digits ("." [0-9]*)?)) ("e" | "E") ("+" | "-")? Digits |
| [6 (Core)] | StringLiteral | ::= | ('"' (('"' '"') | [^"])* '"') | ("'" (("'" "'") | [^'])* "'") |
In the static semantics, the type of an integer literal is simply xs:integer:
In the dynamic semantics, an integer literal is evaluated by constructing an atomic value in the data model, which consists of the literal value and its type:
The formal definitions of decimal, double, and string literals are analogous to those for integer.
|
|
Dynamic Errors
Literal expressions never raise an error.
Introduction
A variable evaluates to the value to which the variable's QName is bound in the evaluation context.
A variable is a core expression, therefore no normalization rule is required for a variable.
In the static semantics, the type of a variable is simply its type in the static type environment statEnv.varType:
If the variable is not bound in the static environment, the system raises a static error.
In the dynamic semantics, a variable is evaluated by "looking up" its value in dynEnv.varValue:
Dynamic Errors
If the variable is not bound in the dynamic environment, the system raises a dynamic error.
| Editorial note | |
| MFF: Given sufficient consistency constraints on the static and dynamic environments, this error rule is not necessary, because every variable must be defined. | |
| [95 (XQuery)] | ParenthesizedExpr | ::= | "(" Expr? ")" |
Core Grammar
The core grammar production for parenthesized expressions is:
| [61 (Core)] | ParenthesizedExpr | ::= | "(" Expr? ")" |
The empty-sequence expression () always has type
empty. It is a static error for any expression other than
() to have the empty type (see [4 Expressions].)
The empty-sequence expression evaluates to the empty sequence.
Dynamic Errors
The default rules for propogating errors, described in [3.5 Errors Handling] apply to parenthesized expressions.
| [41] | ContextItemExpr | ::= | "." |
Introduction
A context item expression evaluates to the context item, which may be either a node or an atomic value.
A context item expression is normalized as the special
purpose variable $fs:dot.
| [.]Expr |
| == |
$fs:dot
|
Introduction
A function call consists of a QName followed by a parenthesized list of zero or more expressions.
| [96 (XQuery)] | FunctionCall | ::= | QName "(" (ExprSingle ("," ExprSingle)*)? ")" |
Because [XPath/XQuery] implicitly converts the values of function arguments, a normalization step is required.
Notation
Normalization of function calls uses an auxiliary mapping []FunctionArgument(SequenceType) used to insert conversions of function arguments that depend only on the expected SequenceType of the formal argument. It is defined as follows:
| [Expr]FunctionArgument(SequenceType) |
| == |
| [[[Expr]AtomizeAtomic(SequenceType)]Extract(SequenceType)]Convert(SequenceType) |
where
[Expr]AtomizeAtomic(SequenceType) denotes
fn:data(Expr) | If SequenceType <: xs:anyAtomic* | |
| Expr | Otherwise |
which specifies that if the function expects atomic
arguments, then fn:data is called to obtain them.
[Expr]Extract(SequenceType) denotes
fn:subsequence(Expr,1,1) | If statEnv.xpath1.0_compatibility is true and SequenceType <: item? | |
| Expr | Otherwise |
which specifies that if the backwards compatibility mode is set, then the first node of the sequence passed as argument is selected.
[Expr]Convert(SequenceType) denotes
fs:convert-simple-operand(Expr,PrototypicalValue) | If SequenceType <: xs:anySimpleType |
| Expr | Otherwise |
where PrototypicalValue has the following values for each possible SequenceType:
| Editorial note | |
| Todo: insert dummy prototypical values for each of the 44+4 types... | |
Note
The fs:convert-simple-operand function uses a so-called
PrototypicalValue, which is a value in the target
type, to ensures that conversion to base types is possible
eventhough types are not first class objects in
[XPath/XQuery].
Each argument in a function call is normalized to its corresponding core expression by applying []FunctionArgument(SequenceType) for each argument with the expected SequenceType for the argument inserted.
| [ QName (Expr1, ..., Exprn) ]Expr |
| == |
| QName ( [Expr1]FunctionArgument(SequenceType1), ..., [Exprn]FunctionArgument(SequenceTypen)) ) |
Note that this normalization rule depends on the static environment containing function signatures and is the only place where we exploit the implicit presence of statEnv. Furthermore notice that the normalization is only well-defined when it is guaranteed that overloading is restricted to atomic types with the same quantifier. This is presently the case.
Core Grammar
The core grammar production for function calls is:
| [62 (Core)] | FunctionCall | ::= | QName "(" (ExprSingle ("," ExprSingle)*)? ")" |
| Editorial note | |
| Proposal (Kris): The following rules attempt to solve the "atomic overload protection" problem by factoring typing over atomic unions. Also it is made explicit that specific typing rules for functions (in [6 Additional Semantics of Functions]) take precedence. | |
To typecheck a core function call we first check in Section [6 Additional Semantics of Functions] if there is a specialized typing rule for the function, and, if so, use it. Otherwise, the function signatures matching the function name and arity are retrieved from the static environment. If the function is not present in the environment with an appropriate signature, an error is raised. The type of each actual argument to the function must be a subtype of a type that is promotable to the corresponding function argument type of the function; if the expected type is a union of atomic types then this check is performed separately for each possibility.
The first rule to bootstrap type checking of a function call expands the function's QName and then applies the function call rule for the expanded function call:
| ||||
|
For a function call in which the static type of one of the expression passed as argument is a union of atomic types, the function call is type checked once separately for each atomic type in that union. The static type of the entire function call expression is then the union of the types computed in each case, as follows:
| |||||
|
Note
Notice that this semantics makes sense since the type declared for a function argument, which uses the sequence types syntax, cannot itself be a union.
Finally, the following auxilliary rule type checks a function call in which none of the actual arguments has a type that is a union of atomic types. The rule looks up the function in the static environment and checks that some signature for the function satisfies the following constraint: the type of each actual argument is a subtype of some type that can be promoted to the type of the correponding function argument. In this case, the function call is well typed and the result type is the return type specified in the function's signature.
| ||||||||
|
The function body itself is not analyzed for each invocation: static typing of the function definition itself guarantees that the function body always returns a value of the declared return type.
Notice that the static typing rule checks the function signature in order to determine whether a function exists rather than just the function arity: this is consistent because it will, indeed, reject function calls with the wrong arity in addition to function calls with the right arity but impossible argument types.
| Editorial note | |
| We could consider changing the language document to talk about type signatures instead of arities but I (Kris) do not personally believe that we it is important...and what IS important (for the dynamic function call rule below) is that the [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators] specification does not overload functions with more than one definition per arity! | |
Based on a function's name and argument types, the function body is retrieved from the dynamic environment. If the function is not present in the environment, a static error is raised.
If the function is a user-defined function then it is evaluated as follows. First, the rule evaluates each actual function argument expression. Next, a match is searched for among the function's possible declaration signatures, retrieved from the statEnv.funcType static environment component. If the function is not present in the environment, or there is no matching declaration signature, a type error is raised. Otherwise, the function body and formal variables are obtained from dynEnv.funcDefn for the matching declaration signature. The rule then extends dynEnv.varValue by binding each formal variable to its corresponding value (converted by the normalization as required for the expected type and backwards compatibility flag), and evaluates the body of the function in the new environment. The resulting value is the value of the function call.
| |||||||||||
|
Note that the function body is evaluated in the default (top-level) environment extended with just the parameter bindings. Note also that input values and output values are matched against the types declared for the function. If static analysis was performed, all these checks are guaranteed to be true and may be omitted.
If the function is a built-in function then the rule is somewhat simpler:
| |||||||||||
|
Built-in function calls use the following auxiliary judgment to evaluate the built-in function:
| "The built-in function F (from [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model], [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators], or [6 Additional Semantics of Functions]) applied to the given parameter values yields the specified result value" | ||
|
| Editorial note | |
| Issue:Built-in function calls must be defined more precisely. See Issue 522 (FS-Issue-0179). | |
Dynamic Errors
If the evaluation of any actual argument raises an error, the function call can raise an error. This rule applies to both user-defined and built-in functions. Note that if more than one expression may raise an error, the function call may raise any one of the errors.
| |||||
|
If, for all possible function signatures, the evaluation of some actual argument yields a value that cannot be promoted to the corresponding formal type of the argument, the function call raises a type error. This rule applies to both user-defined and built-in functions.
| ||||||
|
If the evaluation of the function call to a user-defined function yields a value that cannot be promoted to the corresponding return type of the function, the function call raises a type error.
| |||||||||||
|
If the evaluation of the function call to a built-in function yields a value that cannot be promoted to the corresponding return type of the function, the built-in function call raises a type error.
| |||||||||||
|
Built-in function calls use the following auxiliary judgment to evaluate the built-in function call. If the built-in function raises an error, the function call raises an error.
| "The built-in function F (from data model, type constructor, or functions and operators) applied to the given parameter raises an error" | ||
|
| Editorial note | |
| Issue:Built-in function calls must be defined more precisely. See Issue 522 (FS-Issue-0179). | |
| [3 (XQuery)] | ExprComment | ::= | "(:" (ExprCommentContent | ExprComment)* ":)" |
| [4 (XQuery)] | ExprCommentContent | ::= | Char |
Comments are lexical constructs only, and have no meaning within the query and therefore have no formal semantics.
Introduction
Path expressions are used to locate nodes within a tree. There are two kinds of path expressions, absolute path expressions and relative path expressions. An absolute path expression is a rooted relative path expression. A relative path expression is composed of a sequence of steps.
| [69 (XQuery)] | PathExpr | ::= | ("/" RelativePathExpr?) |
| [70 (XQuery)] | RelativePathExpr | ::= | StepExpr (("/" | "//") StepExpr)* |
Core Grammar
PathExpr and RelativePathExpr are fully normalized. There for, there is no corresponding production in the core. The grammar of path expressions in the core starts with the StepExpr production.
Absolute path expressions are path expressions starting with
the / or / symbols, indicating that
the expression must be applied on the root node in the current
context. The root node in the current context is the greatest
ancestor of the context node. The following two rules normalize
absolute path expressions to relative ones. They use the
fn:root function, which returns the greatest ancestor of its
argument node. The let expressions guarantee that the value
bound to the context variable $fs:dot is a node.
| ["/"]Expr |
| == |
(fn:root(self::node()) treat as document-node())
|
| ["/" RelativePathExpr]Expr |
| == |
[((fn:root(self::node())) treat as document-node()) "/"
RelativePathExpr]Expr
|
| ["//" RelativePathExpr]Expr |
| == |
[((fn:root(self::node())) treat as document-node) "/"
descendant-or-self::node() "/"
RelativePathExpr]Expr
|
A composite relative path expression (using /)
is normalized into a for expression by
concatenating the sequences obtained by mapping each node of the
left-hand side in document order to the sequence it generates on
the right-hand side. The call to the fs:distinct-doc-order
function ensures that the result is in document order without
duplicates. The evaluation context is defined by binding the
$fs:dot,
$fs:sequence,
$fs:position and
$fs:last variables.
Note that sorting by document order enforces the restriction that input and output sequences contains only nodes.
| [StepExpr1 "/" StepExpr2]Expr | ||||||
| == | ||||||
|
Note that for this section uses some auxiliary judgments which are defined in [7.3 Judgments for step expressions and filtering].
Introduction
| [71 (XQuery)] | StepExpr | ::= | AxisStep | FilterStep |
| [72 (XQuery)] | AxisStep | ::= | (ForwardStep | ReverseStep) Predicates |
| [73 (XQuery)] | FilterStep | ::= | PrimaryExpr Predicates |
| [84 (XQuery)] | ForwardStep | ::= | (ForwardAxis NodeTest) | AbbrevForwardStep |
| [85 (XQuery)] | ReverseStep | ::= | (ReverseAxis NodeTest) | AbbrevReverseStep |
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for XPath steps are:
| [45 (Core)] | FilterStep | ::= | PrimaryExpr Predicates |
| [52 (Core)] | ForwardStep | ::= | ForwardAxis NodeTest |
| [53 (Core)] | ReverseStep | ::= | ReverseAxis NodeTest |
Note
Step expressions can be followed by predicates. Normalization of predicates uses the following auxiliary mapping rule: []Predicates, which is specified in [4.2.2 Predicates]. Normalization for step expressions also uses the following auxiliary mapping rule: []Axis, which is specified in [4.2.1.1 Axes].
Normalization of predicates need to distinguish between forward steps, reverse steps, and primary expressions.
As explained in the [XPath/XQuery] document, applying a step in
XPath changes the focus (or context). The change of focus is
made explicit by the normalization rule below, which binds the
variable $fs:dot to the node currently being processed, and
the variable $fs:position to the position (i.e., the position
within the input sequence) of that node.
There are two sets of normalization rules for Predicates. The first set of rules deals with the general case. The second set of rules deals with the case where the content of a predicate is a numeric literal. In that second case, the alternative normalization rules provides a more precise static type than if the general rules were applied.
In the case a predicates are applied on a forward step, the input sequence is first sorted in document order and duplicates are removed. The context is changed to bind the appropriate variable in document order.
Note that applying sorting by document order enforces the restriction that input and output sequences contains only nodes.
| [ForwardStep Predicates "[" Expr "]"]Expr | ||||
| == | ||||
|
In the case predicates are applied on a reverse step, the input sequence is first sorted in document order and duplicates are removed. The context is changed such that the position variable is bound in reverse document order.
Note that applying sorting by document order enforces the restriction that input and output sequences contains only nodes.
| [ReverseStep Predicates "[" Expr "]"]Expr | |||||
| == | |||||
|
In the case predicates are applied on a primary expression, the input sequence is processed in sequence order and the context is bound as in the case of forward axis. In that case, the sequence can contain both nodes and atomic values.
| [PrimaryExpr Predicates "[" Expr "]"]Expr | ||||
| == | ||||
|
In the case the predicate applies to a numeric literal, the following normalization rules apply.
| [ForwardStep Predicates "[" Numeric "]"]Expr | ||||||
| == | ||||||
|
In the case predicates are applied on a reverse step, the position variable is bound in reverse document order.
| [ReverseStep Predicates "[" Expr "]"]Expr | ||||||
| == | ||||||
|
In the case predicates are applied on a primary expression, the input sequence is processed in sequence order and the context is bound as in the case of forward axis. In that case, the sequence can contain both nodes and atomic values.
| [PrimaryExpr Predicates "[" Expr "]"]Expr | ||||||
| == | ||||||
|
Finally, a stand-alone forward or reverse step is normalized through the auxiliary normalization rule for Axis.
The static semantics of an Axis NodeTest pair is obtained by retrieving the type of the context node, and applying the two filters (the Axis, and then the NodeTest with a PrincipalNodeKind) on the result.
| ||||||
| statEnv |- Axis NodeTest : Type3 |
Note
Note that the second judgment in the inference rule imposes that the context item be a node type, hence making sure the dynamic error in case the context node is an atomic value does not occur.
The dynamic semantics of an Axis NodeTest pair is obtained by retrieving the context node, and applying the two filters (Axis, then NodeTest) on the result. The application of each filter is expressed through the filter judgment as follows.
| ||||||
dynEnv |-
Axis NodeTest => fs:distinct-doc-order(Value3)
|
Note
Note that the second judgment in the inference rule makes sure the axis nodetest expression is not evaluated in case the context item is not bound to a node.
Dynamic Errors
If the context item is not a node, the evaluation of an axis node test expression raises a dynamic error.
Introduction
| [88 (XQuery)] | ForwardAxis | ::= | ("child" "::") |
| [89 (XQuery)] | ReverseAxis | ::= | "parent" "::" |
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for XPath axis are:
| [54 (Core)] | ForwardAxis | ::= | ("child" "::") |
| [55 (Core)] | ReverseAxis | ::= | "parent" "::" |
Notation
Normalization of axis uses the following auxiliary mapping rule: []Axis.
Normalization for all axis is specified as follows.
The semantics of the following(-sibling) and preceding(-sibling) axes are expressed by mapping them to core expressions, all other axes are part of core [XPath/XQuery] and therefore are left unchanged through normalization.
[following::
NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
[ancestor-or-self::node()/following-sibling::node()/descendant-or-self::NodeTest]Expr
|
Otherwise, the forward axis is part of the core [XPath/XQuery] and handled by the Axis/NodeTest semantics below:
[child:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
child:: NodeTest
|
[attribute:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
attribute:: NodeTest
|
[self:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
self:: NodeTest
|
[descendant:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
descendant:: NodeTest
|
[descendant-or-self:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
descendant-or-self:: NodeTest
|
[namespace:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
namespace:: NodeTest
|
Reverse axes:
[preceding:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
[ancestor-or-self::node()/preceding-sibling::node()/descendant-or-self::NodeTest]Expr
|
Otherwise, the reverse axis is part of the core.
[parent:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
parent:: NodeTest
|
[ancestor:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
ancestor:: NodeTest
|
[ancestor-or-self:: NodeTest]Axis
|
| == |
ancestor-or-self:: NodeTest
|
Introduction
A node test is a condition applied on the nodes selected by an axis step. Node tests are described by the following grammar productions.
| [90 (XQuery)] | NodeTest | ::= | KindTest | NameTest |
| [91 (XQuery)] | NameTest | ::= | QName | Wildcard |
| [92 (XQuery)] | Wildcard | ::= | "*" |
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for node tests are:
| [56 (Core)] | NodeTest | ::= | KindTest | NameTest |
| [57 (Core)] | NameTest | ::= | QName | Wildcard |
| [58 (Core)] | Wildcard | ::= | "*" |
Introduction
Predicates are composed of zero or more expressions enclosed in square brackets.
| [76 (XQuery)] | Predicates | ::= | ("[" Expr "]")* |
Notation
Normalization of predicates uses the following auxiliary mapping rule: []Predicates.
Predicates in path expressions are normalized with a special mapping rule:
| [Expr]Predicates | |||
| == | |||
|
Note that the semantics of predicates whose parameter is a
numeric value also works for other numeric than integer
values, in which case the op:numeric-equal
returns false when compared to a position. For example the
expression //a[3.4] is allowed and always returns
the empty sequence)
| Editorial note | |
| NEW Issue: The static semantics for the case where the parameter of a predicate is a numeric value is still an open issue. | |
Introduction
[XPath/XQuery] supports operators to construct and combine sequences. A sequence is an ordered collection of zero or more items. An item is either an atomic value or a node.
| [40 (XQuery)] | Expr | ::= | ExprSingle ("," ExprSingle)* |
| [62 (XQuery)] | RangeExpr | ::= | AdditiveExpr ( "to" AdditiveExpr )? |
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for sequence expressions are:
| [31 (Core)] | Expr | ::= | ExprSingle ("," ExprSingle)* |
A sequence expression is normalized into a sequence of normalized single expressions:
The static semantics of the sequence expression follows. The type of the sequence expression is the sequence over the types of the individual expressions.
The dynamic semantics of the sequence expression follows. Each expression in the sequence is evaluated and the resulting values are concatenated into one sequence.
Dynamic Errors
The default rules for propogating errors, described in [3.5 Errors Handling] apply to sequence expressions.
The range operator is normalized to the op:to
operator.
The static semantics of the op:to operator is defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
The dynamic semantics of the op:to operator is defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
Dynamic Errors
The error semantics of the op:to operator is defined in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
[XPath/XQuery] provides several operators for combining sequences.
| [66 (XQuery)] | UnionExpr | ::= | IntersectExceptExpr ( ("union" | "|") IntersectExceptExpr )* |
| [67 (XQuery)] | IntersectExceptExpr | ::= | ValueExpr ( ("intersect" | "except") ValueExpr )* |
| [68 (XQuery)] | ValueExpr | ::= | ValidateExpr | PathExpr |
Notation
The union, intersect, and except expressions are normalized into function calls to the appropriate functions. The mapping function []SequenceOp is defined by the following tables:
| SequenceOp | [SequenceOp]SequenceOp |
| "union" | op:union |
| "|" | op:union |
| "intersect" | op:intersect |
| "except" | op:except |
| [Expr1 SequenceOp Expr2]Expr |
| == |
| [SequenceOp]SequenceOp ( [Expr1]Expr, [Expr2]Expr ) |
The static semantics of the functions that operate on sequences are defined in [6 Additional Semantics of Functions].
The dynamic semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Dynamic Errors
The error semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
[XPath/XQuery] provides arithmetic operators for addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and modulus, in their usual binary and unary forms.
| [63 (XQuery)] | AdditiveExpr | ::= | MultiplicativeExpr ( ("+" | "-") MultiplicativeExpr )* |
| [64 (XQuery)] | MultiplicativeExpr | ::= | UnaryExpr ( ("*" | "div" | "idiv" | "mod") UnaryExpr )* |
| [65 (XQuery)] | UnaryExpr | ::= | ("-" | "+")* UnionExpr |
| [42 (XPath)] | ValueExpr | ::= | PathExpr |
Notation
The mapping function []ArithOp is defined by the following table:
| ArithOp | [ArithOp]ArithOp |
| "+" | fs:plus |
| "-" | fs:minus |
| "*" | fs:times |
| "div" | fs:div |
| "mod" | fs:mod |
| Editorial note | |
| Proposal (Kris). The following rules eliminate let bindings that are not necessary. | |
The normalization rules for all the arithmetic operators except
idiv first atomize
each argument by applying fn:data and then apply the internal
function fs:convert-operand defined in [6.2.5 The fn:data function] to each argument. If the first
argument to this function has type xdt:untypedAtomic, then
the first argument is cast to a double, otherwise it is returned
unchanged. The overloaded internal function corresponding to the
arithmetic operator is then applied to the two converted
arguments. The table above maps the operators to the
corresponding internal function. The mapping from the overloaded
internal functions to the corresponding monomorphic function is
given in [B.2 Mapping of Overloaded Internal Functions].
| [Expr1 ArithOp Expr2]Expr | ||||
| == | ||||
|
The normalization rules for the idiv operator are similar,
but instead of casting arguments with type xdt:untypedAtomic to
xs:double, they are cast to xs:integer.
[Expr1 idiv Expr2]Expr
| ||||
| == | ||||
|
The unary operators are mapped similarly.
Core Grammar
There are no core grammar rules for value comparisons as they are normalized to other core expressions.
The static semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
The dynamic semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Dynamic Errors
The error semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Introduction
Comparison expressions allow two values to be compared. [XPath/XQuery] provides four kinds of comparison expressions, called value comparisons, general comparisons, node comparisons, and order comparisons.
| [61 (XQuery)] | ComparisonExpr | ::= | RangeExpr ( (ValueComp |
| [81 (XQuery)] | ValueComp | ::= | "eq" | "ne" | "lt" | "le" | "gt" | "ge" |
| [80 (XQuery)] | GeneralComp | ::= | "=" | "!=" | "<" | "<=" | ">" | ">=" |
| [82 (XQuery)] | NodeComp | ::= | "is" | "isnot" |
| [83 (XQuery)] | OrderComp | ::= | "<<" | ">>" |
Notation
The mapping function []ValueOp is defined by the following table:
| ValueOp | [ValueOp]ValueOp |
"eq" | fs:eq |
"ne" | fs:ne |
"lt" | fs:lt |
"le" | fs:le |
"gt" | fs:gt |
"ge" | fs:ge |
The normalization rules for the value comparison operators first
atomize each argument by applying fn:data and then apply the
internal function fs:convert-operand defined in [6.2.5 The fn:data function]. If the first argument to this
function has type xdt:untypedAtomic, then the first argument is
cast to a string, otherwise it is returned unchanged. The
overloaded internal function corresponding to the value
comparison operator is then applied to the two converted arguments. The
table above maps the value operators to the corresponding internal
function. The mapping from the overloaded internal functions to
the corresponding monomorphic function is given in [B.2 Mapping of Overloaded Internal Functions].
| [Expr1 ValueOp Expr2]Expr | ||||
| == | ||||
|
Core Grammar
There are no core grammar rules for value comparisons as they are normalized to other core expressions.
The static semantics for function calls is given in
[4.1.5 Function Calls]. The comparison functions all have
return type xs:boolean, as specified in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
The dynamic semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Dynamic Errors
The error semantics rules for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Introduction
General comparisons are defined by adding existential semantics to
value comparisons. The operands of a general comparison may be
sequences of any length. The result of a general comparison is always
true or false.
Notation
For convenience, GeneralOp denotes the operators "=", "!=",
"<", "<=",
">", or ">=".
The function []GeneralOp is defined by the following table:
| GeneralOp | [GeneralOp]GeneralOp |
"=" | fs:eq |
"!=" | fs:ne |
"<" | fs:lt |
"<=" | fs:le |
">" | fs:gt |
">=" | fs:ge |
The normalization rule for a general comparison expression
first atomizes each argument by applying fn:data and then
applies the existentially quantified some expression to
each sequence. The internal function
fs:convert-operand is applied to each pair of atomic
values. If the first argument to this function has type
xdt:untypedAtomic, then the first argument is cast to type
of the second argument. If the second argument has type
xdt:untypedAtomic the first argument is cast to a string.
The overloaded internal function corresponding to the general
comparison operator is then applied to the two converted
values.
| [Expr1 GeneralOp Expr2]Expr | |||||
| == | |||||
|
Core Grammar
There are no core grammar rules for general comparisons as they are normalized to existentially quantified core expressions.
The normalization rules for node comparisons map each argument expression and then apply the internal function corresponding to the node comparison operator.
Core Grammar
There are no core grammar rules for node comparisons as they are normalized to other core expressions.
The static semantics for function calls is given in
[4.1.5 Function Calls]. The node comparison functions all have
return type xs:boolean, as specified in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
The dynamic semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Dynamic Errors
The error semantics rules for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
The normalization rules for order comparisons map each argument expression and then apply the internal function corresponding to the node comparison operator.
Core Grammar
There are no core grammar rules for order comparisons as they are normalized to other core expressions.
The static semantics for function calls is given in
[4.1.5 Function Calls]. The order comparison functions all have
return type xs:boolean, as specified in [XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators].
The dynamic semantics for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Dynamic Errors
The error semantics rules for function calls is given in [4.1.5 Function Calls].
Introduction
A logical expression is either an
and-expression or an
or-expression. The value of a logical expression is
always one of the boolean values: true or
false.
| [55 (XQuery)] | OrExpr | ::= | AndExpr ( "or" AndExpr )* |
| [56 (XQuery)] | AndExpr | ::= | InstanceofExpr ( "and" InstanceofExpr )* |
The normalization rules for "and" and "or" first
get the effective boolean value of each argument, then apply the
appropriate operand.
The logical expressions require that each subexpression have
type xs:boolean. The result type is also xs:boolean.
The dynamic semantics of logical expressions is
non-deterministic. In the expression, Expr1 and Expr2,
if either expression raises an error or evaluates to false, the entire
expression may raise an error or evaluate to false.
In the expression, Expr1 or Expr2,
if either expression raises an error or evaluates to true, the entire
expression may raise an error or evaluate to true.
Dynamic Errors
[XPath/XQuery] supports two forms of constructors: a "direct" form that supports literal XML syntax for elements, attributes, and text nodes, and a "computed" form that can be used to construct element and attribute nodes, possibly with computed names, and also document and text nodes.
Introduction
The static and dynamic semantics of the direct forms of element and attribute constructors is obtained after normalization to computed element constructors.
| [79 (XQuery)] | Constructor | ::= | ElementConstructor |
| [97 (XQuery)] | ElementConstructor | ::= | "<" QName AttributeList ("/>" | (">" ElementContent* "</" QName S? ">")) |
| [108 (XQuery)] | ElementContent | ::= | ElementContentChar |
| [109 (XQuery)] | AttributeList | ::= | (S (QName S? "=" S? AttributeValue)?)* |
| [110 (XQuery)] | AttributeValue | ::= | ('"' (EscapeQuot | QuotAttrValueContent)* '"') |
| [113 (XQuery)] | EnclosedExpr | ::= | "{" Expr "}" |
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for constructors are:
| [51 (Core)] | Constructor | ::= | XmlComment |
| [73 (Core)] | EnclosedExpr | ::= | "{" Expr "}" |
| [108 (XQuery)] | ElementContent | ::= | ElementContentChar |
Notation
The auxiliary mapping rules []ElementContent, []ElementContent-unit, []Attribute, []AttributeContent, []AttributeContent-unit, []NamespaceAttr, and []NamespaceAttrs, are used for the normalization of the content of direct element and attribute constructors.
We start with the rules for normalizing a direct element constructor's content. We distinguish between direct element constructors that contain only one element-content unit and those that contain more than one element-content unit. An element-content unit is a contiguous sequence of literal characters (character references, escaped braces, and predefined entity references), one enclosed expression, one direct element constructor, one CDATA section, one XML comment, or one XML processing instruction. Here are three direct element constructors that each contain one element-content unit:
<date>{ xsd:date("2003-03-18") }</date>
<name>Dizzy Gillespe</name>
<comment><!-- Just a comment --></comment>
The first contains one enclosed expression, the second contains one contiguous sequence of characters, and the third contains one XML comment.
The next example contains six element-content units:
<address>
<!-- Dizzy's address -->
{ 123 }-0A <street>Roosevelt Ave.</street> Flushing, NY { 11368 }
</address>
It contains one XML comment, followed by one enclosed expression that contains the integer 123, one contiguous sequence of characters ("-0A "), one direct XML element constructor, one contiguous sequence of characters (" Flushing, NY"), and one enclosed expression that contains the integer 11368. Evaluating this expression yields this element value:
<address><!-- Dizzy's address -->123-0A <street>Roosevelt Ave.</street> Flushing, NY 11368</address>
Adjacent element-content units are convenient because they permit arbitrary interleaving of text and atomic data. During evaluation, atomic values are converted to text nodes containing the string representations of the atomic values, and then adjacent text nodes are concatenated together. In the example above, the integer 123 is converted to a string and concatenated with "-0A" and the result is a single text node containing "123-0A".
In general, we do not want to convert all atomic values to text nodes, especially when performing static-type analysis, because we lose useful type information. For example, if we normalize the first example above as follows, we lose the important information that the user constructed a date value, not just a text node containing an arbitrary string:
<date>{ xsd:date("2003-03-18") }</date>
(normalization that loses type information) ==
element date { text { "2003-03-18" } }
So to preserve useful type information, we distinguish between direct element constructor's that contain one element-content unit and those that contain more than one (because multiple element-content units commonly denote concatenatation of atomic data and text). Here is the normalization of the first and fourth examples above:
<date>{ xsd:date("2003-03-18") }</date>
==
element date { xsd:date("2003-03-18") }
<address>
<!-- Dizzy's address -->
{ 123 }-0A <street>Roosevelt Ave.</street> Flushing, NY { 11368 }
</address>
==
element address {
attribute zip { "11368" },
fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence(
comment { " Dizzy's address "},
123,
text { "-0A "},
element street {"Roosevelt Ave."},
text { " Flushing, NY" },
11368
)
}
| Editorial note | |
| Mary 2003-03-21: Michael Kay has suggested that instead of distinguishing between direct element constructor's that contain one element-content unit and those that contain more than one element-content unit, we should add a new kind of enclosed expression delimited with {| |} that does not apply the conversion rules and therefore preserves the type information. For example, | |
<date>{| xsd:date("2003-03-18") |}</date>
==
element date { xsd:date("2003-03-18") }
Given the distinction between direct element constructors that we made above, we give two normalization rules for a direct element constructor's content. If the direct element constructor contains exactly one element-content unit, we simply normalize that unit by applying the normalization rule for the element content:
| [ ElementContent1 ]ElementContent-unit |
| == |
| [ ElementContent1 ]ElementContent |
If the direct element constructor contains more than one
element-content unit, we normalize each unit individually and
construct a sequence of the normalized results interleaved with empty
text nodes. The empty text nodes guarantee that the results of
evaluating consecutive element-content units can be distinguished.
Then we apply the function fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence, Section [3.7.1 Direct Element
Constructors] in [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] specifies the rules for
converting a sequence of atomic values and nodes into a sequence of
nodes before element construction. The special function
fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence implements these conversion rules.
| [ElementContent1 ..., ElementContentn]ElementContent-unit, n > 1 |
| == |
fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence([ ElementContent1 ]ElementContent , text { "" }, ..., text { "" }, [ ElementContentn]ElementContent)
|
We need to distinguish between multiple element-content units,
because the rule for converting sequences of atomic values into
strings apply to sequences within distinct enclosed
expressions. The empty text nodes are eliminated
during evaluation of fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence when consecutive text nodes are
coalesced into a single text node. The text node guarantees
that a whitespace character will not be inserted between atomic
values computed by distinct enclosed expressions. For example,
here is an expression, its normalization, and the resulting XML value:
<example>{ 1 }{ 2 }</example>
==
element example { fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence ((1, text {""}, 2)) }
==>
<example>12</example>
In the absence of the empty text node, the expression would evaluate to the following incorrect value:
<example>{ 1 }{ 2 }</example>
(incorrect normalization) ==
element example { fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence ((1, 2)) }
(incorrect value) ==>
<example>1 2</example>
Now that we have explained the normalization rules for direct element content, we give the rules for the two forms of direct XML element constructors. Note that the direct attribute constructors are normalized twice: the []NamespaceAttrs normalizes the namespace-declaration attributes and []AttributeContent maps all other attributes.
| [97 (XQuery)] | ElementConstructor | ::= | "<" QName AttributeList ("/>" | (">" ElementContent* "</" QName S? ">")) |
| [ < QName AttributeList > ElementContent* </ QName S? > ]Expr |
| == |
| element [QName]Expr{ [ AttributeList ]NamespaceAttrs , [ AttributeList ]AttributeContent , [ ElementContent* ]ElementContent } |
| [ < QName AttributeList /> ]Expr |
| == |
| element [QName]Expr { [ AttributeList ]NamespaceAttrs , [ AttributeList ]AttributeContent } |
Next, we give the normalization rules for each element-content unit. The normalization rule for a contiguous sequence of characters assumes:
that the significant whitespace characters in element constructors have been preserved, as described in [4.7.1.4 Whitespace in Element Content];
that character references have been resolved to individual characters and predefined entity references have been resolved to sequences of characters, and
that the rule is applied to the longest contiguous sequence of characters.
The following normalization rule takes the longest consecutive sequence of individual characters that include literal characters, escaped curly braces, character references, and predefined entity references and normalizes the character sequence as a text node containing the string of characters..
| [(Char | "{{" | "}}" | CharRef | PredefinedEntityRef)+]ElementContent |
| == |
text {
fn:codepoints-to-string((Char | "{{" | "}}" | CharRef |
PredefinedEntityRef)+) }
|
XML processing instructions and comments in element content are normalized by applying the standard normalization rules for expressions, which appear in [4.7.2 Other Direct Constructors].
| [XmlProcessingInstruction]ElementContent |
| == |
| [XmlProcessingInstruction]Expr |
| [XmlComment]ElementContent |
| == |
| [XmlComment]Expr |
An enclosed expression in element content is normalized by normalizing each individual expression in its expression sequence and then constructing a sequence of the normalized values:
| [ { Expr1, ..., Exprn } ]ElementContent |
| == |
| [ Expr1 ]Expr , ..., [ Exprn]Expr |
Core Grammar
There are no core grammar rules for direct XML element or attribute constructors as they are normalized to computed constructors.
There are no additional static type rules for direct XML element or attribute constructors.
There are no additional dynamic evaluation rules for direct XML element or attribute constructors.
Dynamic Errors
There are no additional error semantics rules for direct XML element or attribute constructors.
Like literal XML element constructors, literal XML attribute constructors are normalized to computed attribute constructors.
| [109 (XQuery)] | AttributeList | ::= | (S (QName S? "=" S? AttributeValue)?)* |
| [110 (XQuery)] | AttributeValue | ::= | ('"' (EscapeQuot | QuotAttrValueContent)* '"') |
Direct attribute may contain namespace-declaration attributes. The normalization rules for attributes ignore namespace-declaration attributes -- they are handled by the normalization rules in [4.7.1.2 Namespaces].
As with literal XML elements, we need to distinguish between direct attribute constructors that contain one attribute-content unit and those that contain multiple attribute-content units, because the rule for converting sequences of atomic values into strings are applied to sequences within distinct enclosed expressions. If the direct attribute constructor contains exactly one attribute-content unit, we simply normalize that unit by applying the normalization rule for the attribute content:
| [ AttributeValueContent1 ]AttributeContent-unit |
| == |
| [AttributeValueContent1]AttributeContent |
If the direct attribute constructor contains more than one
attribute-content unit, we normalize each unit individually and
construct a sequence of the normalized results interleaved with
empty text nodes. The empty text nodes guarantee that the
results of evaluating consecutive attribute-content units can be
distinguished. Then we apply the function
fs:item-sequence-to-untypedAtomic, which applies the appropriate
conversion rules to the normalized attribute content:
| [ AttributeValueContent1 ..., AttributeValueContentn ]AttributeContent-unit, n > 1 |
| == |
fs:item-sequence-to-untypedAtomic([ AttributeValueContent1
]AttributeContent , text { "" }, ..., text
{""}, [
AttributeValueContentn]AttributeContent)
|
An AttributeList is normalized by the following rule, which maps each of the individual attribute-value expressions in the attribute list and constructs a sequence of the normalized values.
[
| |||
| == | |||
|
Namespace-declaration attributes, i.e., those attributes whose
prefix is xmlns are ignored by mapping them to the
empty sequence.
| ||
| == | ||
| () |
All attributes that are not namespace-declaration attributes are mapped to computed attribute constructors.
| ||
| == | ||
| attribute [Prefix:LocalPart ]Expr { [AttributeValue]AttributeContent} |
Literal characters, escaped curly braces, character references, and predefined entity references in attribute content are treated as in element content. In addition, the normalization rule for characters in attributes assumes:
that an escaped single or double quote is converted to an individual single or double quote.
The following normalization rules take the longest consecutive sequence of individual characters that include literal characters, escaped curly braces, character references, predefined entity references, and escaped single and double quotes and normalizes the character sequence as a string.
| [Char+]AttributeContent |
| == |
fn:codepoints-to-string(Char+)
|
We normalize an enclosed expression in attribute content by normalizing each individual expression in its expression sequence and then construct a sequence of the normalized values:
| [ { Expr0, ..., Exprn } ]AttributeContent |
| == |
| ([ Expr0 ]Expr , ..., [ Exprn]Expr) |
Direct attribute may contain namespace-declaration attributes. The normalization rules for namespace-declaration attributes ignore all non-namespace attributes -- they are handled by the normalization rules in [4.7.1.1 Attributes].
An AttributeList containing namespace-declaration attributes is normalized by the following rule, which maps each of the individual namespace-declaration attributes in the attribute list and constructs a sequence of the normalized values.
[
| |||
| == | |||
|
Attributes whose
prefix is not xmlns are ignored by mapping them to the
empty sequence.
| ||
| == | ||
| () |
Namespace-declaration attributes are normalized to computed namespace constructors.
| ||
| == | ||
| namespace [Prefix:LocalPart ]Expr { [AttributeValue]AttributeContent} |
Section [3.7.1.4
Whitespace in Element Content] in [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] describes
how whitespace in element and attribute constructors is
processed depending on the value of the xmlspace
declaration in the query prolog. The formal semantics assumes
that the rules for handling whitespace are applied prior to
normalization rules, for example, during parsing of a query.
Therefore, there are no formal rules for handling
whitespace.
| [105 (XQuery)] | CdataSection | ::= | "<![CDATA[" Char* "]]>" |
| [106 (XQuery)] | XmlPI | ::= | "<?" PITarget Char* "?>" |
| [18 (XQuery)] | PITarget | ::= | NCName |
| [107 (XQuery)] | XmlComment | ::= | "<!--" Char* "-->" |
Core Grammar
The core grammar productions for other constructors and comments are:
| [69 (Core)] | CompTextConstructor | ::= | "text" "{" Expr? "}" |
| [67 (Core)] | CompXmlPI | ::= | (("pi" NCName "{") | ("pi" "{" Expr "}" "{")) Expr? "}" |
| [68 (Core)] | ComputedXmlComment | ::= | "comment" "{" Expr "}" |
A literal XML character data (CDATA) section is normalized into a text node constructor by applying the rule for converting characters to a text node in element content.
| [<![CDATA[" Char* "]]>]ElementContent |
| == |
| [Char*]ElementContent |
A literal XML processing instruction is normalized into a processing instruction constructor; its character content is converted to a string as in attribute content.
| [<? NCName Char* ?>"]Expr |
| == |
| processing-instruction NCName { [Char*]AttributeContent } |
A literal XML comment is normalized into a comment constructor; its character content is converted to a string as in attribute content.
| [<!-- Char* -->]Expr |
| == |
| comment { [Char*]AttributeContent } |
There are no additional static type rules for CDATA or direct processing-instruction constructors.
There are no additional dynamic evaluation rules for CDATA or direct processing-instruction constructors.
Dynamic Errors
There are no additional error semantics rules for CDATA or direct processing-instruction constructors.
| [99 (XQuery)] | CompElemConstructor | ::= | (("element" QName "{") | ("element" "{" Expr "}" "{")) Expr? "}" |
| [101 (XQuery)] | CompAttrConstructor | ::= | (("attribute" QName "{") | ("attribute" "{" Expr "}" "{")) Expr? "}" |
| [98 (XQuery)] | CompDocConstructor | ::= | "document" "{" Expr "}" |
| [104 (XQuery)] | CompTextConstructor | ::= | "text" "{" Expr? "}" |
| [102 (XQuery)] | CompXmlPI | ::= | (("pi" NCName "{") | ("pi" "{" Expr "}" "{")) Expr? "}" |
| [103 (XQuery)] | ComputedXmlComment | ::= | "comment" "{" Expr "}" |
| [100 (XQuery)] | CompNSConstructor | ::= | ("namespace" NCName "{") Expr "}" |
Notation
Computed namespace constructors may only occur directly within computed element constructors. Computed namspace constructors may occur explicitly in the query or may be the result of normalizing namespace-declaration attributes. To simplify typing and evaluation, we assume that the mapping function []SplitNamespaces reorders the expressions in the element constructor so that all namespace constructors preceed all other expressions. We do not define this mapping function formally.
Computed element constructors are normalized by mapping their name and content expression.
| [element QName { Expr }]Expr |
| == |
| element [QName]Expr { [ [Expr]SplitNamespaces ]Expr } |
When the name of an element is computed, the normalization rule
also checks that the value of the element's name is a xs:QName or a
xs:string. If the name expression returns a string, that string is
implicitly cast to a QName by using the fn:QName-in-context function
with its $use-default parameter set to true. The resulting expanded
QName is used as the name of the constructed element.
| [element { Expr1 } { Expr2 }]Expr | |||||||
| == | |||||||
|
The normalization rules leave us with only the computed form of the element constructor. The computed constructor also has two forms: one in which the element name is a literal QName, and the other in which the element name is a computed expression.
We start with the static rule for an element constructor with a computed name
expression, because it is the simplest rule.
Because the element's name cannot be known until runtime, the element
is given the wildcard type,
element * of type xdt:untypedAny.
The computed name
expression must have type xs:QName and the content expression must
have a type of zero-or-more attributes followed by zero-or-more
element, text, comment, or processing-instruction nodes.
| |||
statEnv |-
element { Expr1 } { Expr2 }
: element * of type xdt:untypedAny
|
In the first rule for a computed element constructor with a literal
QName, we consider the case in which the validation mode is set to
"skip", which means that all type information in the element
is ignored and the new element is labeled with the type xdt:untypedAny. The content
expression must have a type of zero-or-more attributes followed by
zero-or-more element, text, comment, or processing-instruction nodes.
The result
type is an element of type xdt:untypedAny.
| ||||
statEnv |-
element QName { Expr }
: element ExpandedQName of type xdt:untypedAny
|
In the remaining rules, the validation mode is either "lax" or "strict", and the static rules for element constructors check that the type of the element's content expression are valid with respect to the type of the element being constructed.
Recall that in the static semantics of arithmetic,
general comparison, and function arguments, the static rules are
liberal when an expression with type xdt:untypedAtomic is
used in the context where an atomic typed expression is required. In
these cases, it is not possible to determine statically whether the
evaluation-time cast of the xdt:untypedAtomic value to the
required type will succeed, but the rules optimistically assume that
they will. In all other cases, the static rules are conservative and
require that the type of the argument expression be a subtype of the
required type. We apply a similar static semantics to element
constructors in which the required type of the constructed element is simple, i.e., a subtype of xdt:anyAtomicType*
The first rule below applies to element constructors whose required type is simple. If the content expression is a sequence of expressions all of which have type untypedAtomic or text, we apply a liberal static rule (i.e., assume the run-time validation will succeed) and assign the appropriate static type:
| ||||||
| statEnv |- element QName { Expr } : element ExpandedQName of type TypeName |
The second rule also applies to element constructors whose required type
is simple and whose content expression is not a sequence of
expressions of type
xdt:untypedAtomic or text. In this case, the static rule is
conservative and requires that the type of the context expression be a
subtype of the element's required type.
| |||||||
| statEnv |- element QName { Expr } : element ExpandedQName of type TypeName |
The third rule applies to element constructors whose required type is complex. In this case, the static type rule is conservative: the type of the element's content expression must be a subtype of its required type.
| |||||||
| statEnv |- element QName { Expr } : element ExpandedQName of type TypeName |
The following dynamic-semantics rules construct an element from its name and content expression. The dynamic semantics of the element constructor expression is the most complex semantics in XQuery. Here is how to read the rule below.
First, the element's name is expanded into a qualified name.
Second, the element's content expression is partitioned into the computed namespace constructors and all other expressions, and the computed namespace constructors are evaluated, yielding a sequence of namespace annotations. The static environment is extended to include the new namespace annotations, which are all active.
Third, the function
fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence is applied to the
element's content expression (excluding computed namespace constructors);
this function call is evaluated in the new static and dynamic environment.
Recall from the section on normalization that during
normalization, we do not convert the content of direct element
constructors that contain one element-content unit. This
guarantees that useful type information is preserved for static
analysis. Since the conversion function
fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence was not applied to all element
constructors during normalization, we have to apply it at
evaluation time. (Obviously, it is possible to elide the
application of fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence injected during
normalization and the application injected during evaluation.)
The resulting value Value0 must match zero-or-more
attributes followed by zero-or-more element, text,
processing-instruction or comment nodes.
Fourth, The namespace annotations are concatenated with the list of active namespaces in the namespace environment statEnv.namespace and the namespaces corresponding to the element's name and all attributes names. The resulting sequence is the sequence of namespace annotations for the element.
Lastly, recall that an element constructor
automatically validates the constructed element node, using the validation
mode and validation context from its static context. The last
step in evaluation is to construct a new element with type
annotation xdt:untypedAny and with content Value0 and then
validate the element using the validation mode and context from
the static environment.
| |||||||||||||||
| statEnv dynEnv |- element QName { Expr } => Value1 |
The dynamic evaluation of an element constructor with a computed name is similar.
| |||||||||||||||
| statEnv dynEnv |- element { Expr1 } { Expr2 } { NamespaceAnnotations } => Value2 |
Dynamic Errors
The default rules for propogating errors, described in
[3.5 Errors Handling] apply to element
constructors. In addition, an element constructor with a computed name raises a type error if the
name value is not a xs:QName.
| ||
| dynEnv |- element { Expr1 } { Expr2 } raises typeError |
Both forms of element constructors raises a type error if the element's content is not a sequence of attributes followed by a sequence of element, text, comment, or processing-instruction nodes.
Computed attribute constructors are normalized by mapping their name and content expression in the same way that computed element constructors are normalized.
| [attribute { Expr1 } { Expr2 }]Expr | |||||||
| == | |||||||
|
Core Grammar
The core grammar rules for computed element and attribute constructors are:
| [64 (Core)] | CompElemConstructor | ::= | (("element" QName "{") | ("element" "{" Expr "}" "{")) Expr? "}" |
| [66 (Core)] | CompAttrConstructor | ::= | (("attribute" QName "{") | ("attribute" "{" Expr "}" "{")) Expr? "}" |
The normalization rules leave us with only the computed form of the attribute constructors. The computed constructor also has two forms: one in which the attribute name is a literal QName, and the other in which the attribute name is a computed expression.
We start with the static rule for an attribute constructor with a computed name
expression, because it is the simplest rule.
The computed name expression must have type xs:QName. The result
type is an attribute of type xdt:untypedAtomic.
| ||
statEnv |-
attribute { Expr1 } { Expr2 }
: attribute * of type xdt:untypedAtomic
|
In the first rule for a computed attribute constructor with a literal
QName, we consider the case in which the validation mode is set to
"skip", which means that all type information in the attribute
is ignored and the new attribute is labeled with the type xdt:untypedAtomic.
| |||
statEnv |-
attribute QName { Expr }
: element ExpandedQName of type xdt:untypedAtomic
|
In the remaining rules, the validation mode is either "lax" or "strict", and the static rules for attribute constructors check that the type of the attribute's content expression are valid with respect to the type of the attribute being constructed.
As in element constructors, the static rules are
liberal when a single xdt:untypedAtomic content
expression is provided as an argument and conservative, otherwise.
If the content expression is a sequence of expressions all of which are untypedAtomic, we apply a liberal static rule (i.e., assume the validation will succeed) and assign the appropriate static type:
| |||||
| statEnv |- attribute QName { Expr } : attribute ExpandedQName TypeReference |
In the second case, the static type rule is conservative: the type of the attribute's content expression must be a subtype of its required type.
| ||||||
| statEnv |- attribute QName { Expr } : attribute ExpandedQName of type TypeName |
The following rules construct an attribute from its name and
content expression. The rules are similar to those for element
constructors. First, the attribute's
name is expanded into a qualified name. Second, the function
fs:item-sequence-to-untypedAtomic is applied to the content expression
and this function call is evaluated in the dynamic environment.
Recall from the section on normalization that during
normalization, we do not
convert the content of direct attribute constructors that contain
one attribute-content unit. This guarantees that useful type
information is preserved for static analysis. Since the
conversion function fs:item-sequence-to-untypedAtomic was not applied to
all attribute constructors during normalization, we have to apply
it at evaluation time. (As before, it is possible to elide the
application of fs:item-sequence-to-untypedAtomic injected during normalization
and the application injected during evaluation.) The resulting value Value0 must match
zero-or-more attributes followed by zero-or-more element, text,
processing-instruction or comment nodes.
| |||
| dynEnv |- attribute QName { Expr } => attribute ExpandedQName { Value } |
| |||
| dynEnv |- attribute { Expr } { Expr } => attribute { Value0 } { Value } |
Dynamic Errors
The default rules for propogating errors, described in
[3.5 Errors Handling] apply to attribute
constructors. In addition, an attribute constructor with a computed name raises a type error
if the name value is not a xs:QName.
A document node constructor contains an expression, which
must evaluate to a sequence of element, text, comment, or
processing-instruction nodes. Section [3.7.2.3 Document
Node Constructors] in [XQuery 1.0: A Query Language for XML] specifies the rules
for converting a sequence of atomic values and nodes into a
sequence of nodes before document construction. The special
function fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence([6.1.2 The fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence function]) implements this conversion.
Core Grammar
The core grammar rule for a computed document constructor is:
| [63 (Core)] | CompDocConstructor | ::= | "document" "{" Expr "}" |
The static semantics checks that the type of the argument expression is a
sequence of element, text, processing-instruction, and comment nodes. The type of the entire
expression is a docum