Summarized test results:
List style type

Snapshot summary, 2011-12-17

Only Chrome and Safari support the numeric list-style-types, and then not all of them. Of the 24 styles tested, 7 were not supported. It is not clear why these were omitted.

Snapshot summary, 2011-12-17

All browsers supported lower-greek. This was one of the CSS 2.1 styles.

Of the rest, only Chrome and Safari supported any styles, and then only 10 of the 52 styles, and of those only 2 passed (and even those used a different suffix). Notes on how the other 8 tests diverged from the spec can be found below the table.

Notes:

1. hiragana, Firefox, Chrome, Safari: All displayed a result, but the implementations include ゐ and ゑ before を and ん at the end of the basic sequence, so all results beyond that were out of synch by two positions. The suffix was also a period rather than an ideographic comma.
2. katakana, Firefox, Chrome, Safari: As for hiragana, all displayed a result, but the implementations include ゐ and ゑ before を and ん at the end of the basic sequence, so all results beyond that were out of synch by two positions. The suffix was also a period rather than an ideographic comma.
3. hiragana-iroha, Firefox, Chrome, Safari: The CSS3 spec includes a ん at the end that is not in the implementations. Following markers are therefore out of synch. Also, the suffix was a period rather than an ideographic comma .
4. katakana-iroha, Firefox, Chrome, Safari: Same as hiragana-iroha.
5. cjk-earthly-branch, Chrome, Safari: Suffix was a period rather than an ideographic comma.
6. cjk-heavenly-branch, Chrome, Safari: Suffix was a period rather than an ideographic comma.
7. afar, Chrome, Safari: The implementation was missing ዸ, so the sequence was out of synch from then onwards.
8. oromo, Chrome, Safari: Fine except that ጰ was used for ጸ and vice versa throughout.
9. sidama, Chrome, Safari: The implementation added a ሐ that was not in the spec. Also, ጰ was used for ጸ and vice versa throughout.
10. tigre, Chrome, Safari: ጰ was used for ጸ and vice versa throughout,

Snapshot summary, 2011-12-17

No browsers supported non-repeating styles.

Snapshot summary, 2011-12-17

Of the 12 styles tested, only a handful were supported.

Armenian (a CSS 2.1 style) was supported by all browsers, but there was a small deviation in one case for the WebKit-based browsers (see the notes below the table). Only Firefox, however, reverted to simple decimal numbers from 10,000 onwards, as described in the spec – the others used additional Armenian characters.

Georgian (another CSS 2.1 style) was fully supported by all browsers tested.

The Hebrew style, supported by Firefox, Chrome and Safari, exhibited significant differences from the spec when it reached 1000. It may be that the spec is incomplete.

Notes:

1. armenian, lower-armenian, upper-armenian, Chrome, Safari: uses Ւ instead of ՈՒ.
2. hebrew, over 499, Firefox, Chrome, Safari: At 1000 the implementation and the spec diverge. The implementation has a symbol for 1000 that is not in the spec. (it is possible that the spec is incomplete.)