ISSUE-426: MHP vs W3C reference for PNG

MHP vs W3C reference for PNG

State:

CLOSED

Product:

TTML IMSC 1.0

Raised by:

Glenn Adams

Opened on:

2015-09-21

Description:

The phrase "complete image" should simply read "image". If it conforms to the cited PNG coding, then it is "complete".

Why is the [MHP] specification referenced for the PNG coding when the W3C publishes a spec at [1]? If the MHP version is to be used, then an explanation is needed about the divergence this may produce. Note that most presentation engines are not going to use the MHP profile of PNG unless they are part of an MHP implementation, which we certainly cannot assume here.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/PNG/

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. {minutes} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-15 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-15)
2. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-15 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-14)
3. RE: {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from mdolan@newtbt.com on 2015-10-08)
4. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-07)
5. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-01 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-10-01)
6. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-09-24 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2015-09-23)
7. Update re: outstanding IMSC1 issues (from pal@sandflow.com on 2015-09-21)
8. ISSUE-426: MHP vs W3C reference for PNG [TTML IMSC 1.0] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2015-09-21)

Related notes:

Display change log