Changelog between September 8, 2014 and September 15, 2014

Issues | Actions.

Get changelog

Issues

ISSUE-207 [initial value of color property] (pending review)
  • 2014-09-14 13:34:57:
    *<Glenn Adams> Status changed to 'pending review'
    *<Glenn Adams> Added new tt:initial element type, specified as a child of <styling/>, e.g.,

    <styling>
    <initial tts:color="yellow"/>
    </styling

    https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/cc79aa829687
ISSUE-210 [rgba() alpha value space] (open)
  • 2014-09-14 13:40:50:
    *<Glenn Adams> Address this in the HTML/CSS mapping section.
ISSUE-277 [region-style-inheritance] (pending review)
ISSUE-281 [non-inherited style initialization] (pending review)
  • 2014-09-14 13:37:48:
    *<Glenn Adams> Add proscription against this usage (8.2). Still need to back-fill as TTML1 errata.

    https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/cc79aa829687
  • 2014-09-14 13:38:00:
    *<Glenn Adams> Product changed to TTML2
    *<Glenn Adams> Status changed to 'pending review'
ISSUE-286 [rowPadding] (open)
ISSUE-307 [Profile and conformance terminology] (open)
ISSUE-315 [Maximum number of regions should be a processor constraint] (open)
ISSUE-319 [HRM should be a processor compliance test] (open)
ISSUE-321 (pending review)
ISSUE-327 [IMSC should meet W3C QA Framework Spec guidelines] (open)
ISSUE-332 [#cellResolution support] (open)
ISSUE-339 [allow #overflow] (open)
ISSUE-340 [profile designator clarification] (pending review)
ISSUE-342 [add 2 ebutts elements] (open)
  • 2014-09-11 14:53:15:
    *[nigel]: Make sure to include a note along the lines of the forcedDisplay note that TTML2 and IMSC 2 may do it differently.
ISSUE-343 [non-IMSC/TTML elements] (pending review)
ISSUE-344 [Note for unqualified attributes] (open)
  • 2014-09-09 10:45:55:
    *<Nigel Megitt> Created issue 'Add a clarification note expressing intent behind unqualified attribute names' nickname Note for unqualified attributes owned by Nigel Megitt on product TTML2, description 'TTML 1 and TTML 2 describe non-normatively the intent behind unqualified element names, in section 5.1 Namespaces, i.e. "If a reference to an element type is used in this specification and the name of the element type is not namespace qualified, then the TT Namespace applies.".

    However this leaves unstated the intent for unqualified attribute names. In fact the intent is as in XML that unqualified attributes are in no namespace, and are qualified structurally by their parent element, which is therefore different to the intent for elements.

    To aid interpretation and clarify for readers less familiar with this concept I propose adding a non-normative note to §5.1 clarifying this for attributes with no namespace qualification, something like:

    --
    Note:

    If a reference to an attribute is used in this specification and the name of the attribute is not namespace qualified, then no namespace applies; the attribute is qualified by the element to which it belongs.
    --
    ' non-public
  • 2014-09-09 10:49:08:
    *<Nigel Megitt> Description changed to 'TTML 1 and TTML 2 describe non-normatively the intent behind unqualified element names, in section 5.1 Namespaces, i.e. "If a reference to an element type is used in this specification and the name of the element type is not namespace qualified, then the TT Namespace applies.".

    However this leaves unstated the intent for unqualified attribute names. In fact the intent is as in XML that unqualified attributes are in no namespace, and are qualified structurally by their parent element, which is therefore different to the intent for elements.

    To aid interpretation and clarify for readers less familiar with this concept I propose adding a non-normative note to §5.1 clarifying this for attributes with no namespace qualification, something like:

    --
    Note:

    If a reference to an attribute is used in this specification and the name of the attribute is not namespace qualified, then no namespace applies; the attribute is qualified by the element to which it belongs.
    --

    This is related to Issue-304.'
  • 2014-09-11 14:39:24:
    *Status changed to 'open'

Actions

ACTION-234: Glenn Adams to Explore box-decoration-break in response to issue-286 (pending review)
  • 2014-09-14 14:02:31:
    * <Glenn Adams> Status changed to 'pending review'
    * <Glenn Adams> Recommend against explicit mapping to box-decoration-break due to uncertainty about its specification and implementation schedule. At present, it is defined at [1].

    [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-break/#break-decoration
ACTION-236: Glenn Adams to Review consistent use of "root temporal extent" in both ttml 2 and ttml 1 se (open)
ACTION-286: Glenn Adams to Send an email to public-tt describing the ttv hosting site at w3c (open)
ACTION-287: Glenn Adams to Elaborate on wording in §4 on namespace extension in ttml2 and as an errata to ttml1 (open)
ACTION-298: Glenn Adams to Either proscribe or define semantics on specifying both @extends and @restricts on a ttp:{feature,ext3ension} (pending review)
  • 2014-09-14 14:15:26:
    * <Glenn Adams> Status changed to 'pending review'
    * <Glenn Adams> Prohibit use of both attributes at same time, i.e., new feature/extension is either an extension or a restriction, but not both. Define different features/extensions to get both.

    https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ttml/rev/35a26d7b2d4c
ACTION-320: Glenn Adams to Review https://www.w3.org/wiki/ttml/codecsregistry w.r.t. recent ttml2 changes in profile definition mechanisms (open)
ACTION-322: Jerry Smith to Indicate preference for updating sdp-us for ttml2 (closed)
  • 2014-09-10 22:44:09:
    * <Jerry Smith> We have reviewed SDP-US and IMSC, and currently believe the latter encompasses a more usable set of TTML for Internet media. I don't recommend we update SDP-US for TTML2 changes at this time.
  • 2014-09-11 14:15:40:
    * <Jerry Smith> Status changed to 'pending review'
  • 2014-09-11 14:36:57:
    * Status changed to 'closed'
ACTION-324: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux to Draft a note for imsc 1 progressivelydecodable to make concrete what authors should take into account (closed)
ACTION-325: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux to Check if respec has been updated for the 2014 w3c process (closed)
  • 2014-09-11 14:34:57:
    * Status changed to 'closed'
ACTION-326: Frans de Jong to Review resolution to issue-340 and add review comments to issue (open)
  • 2014-09-11 14:43:05:
    * Created action 'Review resolution to issue-340 and add review comments to issue' assigned to Frans de Jong, due 2014-09-18
ACTION-327: Frans de Jong to Review resolution to issue-343 and add review comments to issue (open)
  • 2014-09-11 14:43:56:
    * Created action 'Review resolution to issue-343 and add review comments to issue' assigned to Frans de Jong, due 2014-09-18

David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Nigel Megitt <nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk>, Chairs, Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: changelog.php,v 1.34 2014-02-12 10:08:50 dom Exp $