ISSUE-260: When agent is not @type 'character', then should prohibit actor child.

actor in non-character agent

When agent is not @type 'character', then should prohibit actor child.

State:

CLOSED

Product:

TTML 1.0

Raised by:

Glenn Adams

Opened on:

2013-07-07

Description:

It doesn't make sense to have an actor child in agent when @type of agent is not 'character'.

Related Actions Items:

• ACTION-186 on Glenn Adams to Work with Nigel to come up with a resolution for issue 260 - due 2013-08-01, closed

Related emails:

1. TTML Agenda for 19/09/13 (from Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com on 2013-09-19)
2. No Meeting today 12-09-13 (from Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com on 2013-09-12)
3. Minutes for 05/09/13 (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2013-09-05)
4. Agenda for 05/09/13 (from glenn@skynav.com on 2013-09-04)
5. RE: TTML Agenda for 29/08/13 (from mdolan@newtbt.com on 2013-08-28)
6. TTML Agenda for 29/08/13 (from glenn@skynav.com on 2013-08-28)
7. Re: TML Agenda for 06/08/13 (from glenn@skynav.com on 2013-08-08)
8. [Minutes] TTWG telecon 08/08/2013 (from tmichel@w3.org on 2013-08-08)
9. ISSUE-260: which agent types should permit actor child (from nigel.megitt@bbc.co.uk on 2013-08-08)
10. Re: TML Agenda for 06/08/13 (from pal@palemieux.com on 2013-08-08)
11. TML Agenda for 06/08/13 (from Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com on 2013-08-08)
12. [minutes] Timed Text 20130725 (from plh@w3.org on 2013-07-25)
13. TTML Agenda for 25/07/13 (from Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com on 2013-07-25)
14. ISSUE-260 (actor in non-character agent): When agent is not @type 'character', then should prohibit actor child. [TTML.next] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-07-07)

Related notes:

Display change log