Re: SC 4.1.1 and WCAG 2.0

Hi Patrick,

Mary-Jo is obviously best placed to talk about the ACRs, on the spec side:

> Was it because we couldn't spin up an update/republication of 2.0.

Essentially yes, it is theoretically possible to update but it would involve a huge amount of work.


> If so, does the mention in the errata supersede the main spec text

Yes, in effect you have to imagine the errata are in place in the main spec.

Where we re-publish a spec (like 2.1 recently) the errata will then appear on the face of the spec, but technically they apply even when that isn’t the case.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>