Re: CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1

+1.


I note in passing that in the errrata it states each entry has


[[[
A unique entry number
The date it was added to the errata page.
The section referred to.
A description of the problem and correction if applicable.
A rationale for making the change (not required for editorial errata).
]]]


Unfortunately, this isn't true. Please let's make sure that in future it is. 


It would also be good to have a link to the relevant discussion, probably generally starting from the resolution, given that looking there should provide the pointers back to the fuller discussion...


cheers


Chaals


On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 11:01:03 (+02:00), Alastair Campbell wrote:



> Call For Consensus — ends Monday July 31st at midday Boston time.

>

>

>

> This call is to re-publish WCAG 2.1 to include all the errata since it was originally published in 2018.

>

>

>

> There are various editorial updates (errata) to WCAG 2.1 that are not immediately visible to people looking at the main TR location: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/

>

>

>

> Republishing would make these updates available in the default location.

>

>

>

> The changes from the current published version are highlighted in this version:

>

> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2FWCAG-2.1-catchup%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html

>

>

>

> Notable updates include the note for Parsing and updates to the red-flash definition.

>

>

>

> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

>

> Kind regards,

>

> -Alastair

>

> --

>

> @alastc / www.nomensa.com

>

>


-- 
Charles 'Chaals' Nevile
Lead Standards Architect, ConsenSys Inc