Re: CFC - Errata for WCAG 2.1 accessibility supported definition

+1

On 06/01/2022 17:31, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday January 10th at mid-day Boston time.
> 
> The Working Group has discussed a small change to a note on a definition:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#h-note-43 
> <https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#h-note-43>
> 
> Whilst it is a small change, it is normative therefore we are going 
> through the CFC process.
> 
> It was raised in this issue:
> 
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1758 
> <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/1758>
> 
> Discussed and agreed in this meeting:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2022/01/04-ag-minutes.html#t06 
> <https://www.w3.org/2022/01/04-ag-minutes.html#t06>
> 
> The specific changes are detailed in this pull request:
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1777/files 
> <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1777/files>
> 
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
> before the CfC deadline.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> -Alastair
> 
> -- 
> 
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com>
> 


-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Thursday, 6 January 2022 19:00:18 UTC