See also: IRC log
<janina> Michael, can you hear me?
<janina> Oops.
<janina> Will hang up and try again.
<janina> Still no go? Argh. Another device!
<scribe> scribe: Gottfried
Janina: Ongoing
self-assessment
... (separate agenda item)
Michael: HTML 5.2 is now up
Janina: I have a review on that - will come up on action items
Michael: Leonie says that now there is stuff to look at
Janina: They are looking to go to CR in June
<scribe> New URI: http://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist
Michael: Didn't get much of
comments, not even from APA members.
... I filled the Explanation column - should be better
understandable now.
... Has not had any review yet. We need a hives review
now.
... Will be presented to the Advisory Committee in two weeks.
Need a quick turn-around if issues exist.
... I can make fixes quickly if necessary.
Janina: Should close this next week.
Michael: I sent an email message already
<MichaelC> Updates to technology checklist
Janina: Maybe we should add to the subject line that we want to close
Michael: Did not want to - since i am not chair
Janina: Can we start a CfC next week only?
Michael: We need consensus - no choice. I may need some time to fix issues.
Janina: Probably not call this
"final"?
... We will not run a CfC but we absolutely need to remove any
major issues.
Michael: For later, we need to talk about other things like where the doc should live
Janina: We had a kind of informal last call in the past weeks. They have a corpus of supporting issue papers.
<MichaelC> Latest edits to COGA Issue Papers: https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/issue-papers/
Janina: This seems appropriate to get wider review. May still need some editorial work, but substantively good.
<MichaelC> Latest edits to COGA Gap Analysis: https://rawgit.com/w3c/coga/master/gap-analysis/
Michael: Don't think we sent out
a CfC to AG wg.
... Only informally. Did not get a response yet.
Janina: Suggestion we had talked
about: More active voice rather than passive voice.
... Send out a CfC?
... (no objection)
... Okay, i will send a CfC without a telecon.
Janina: Are we done? Or is there
more to do for us?
... If this is ready, Katie and i will present it to the WAI
IG.
... Anyone thinking we need more time on this?
(nobody)
scribe: I propose we are
finished
... I will contact Katie about this
<MichaelC> https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2117
action-2117?
<trackbot> action-2117 -- Janina Sajka to Check our checklist list against iso 30007-1 -- due 2017-03-08 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2117
Gottfried: Should be ISO/IEC
30071-1
... Title is: Information technology — Development of user
interface accessibility — Part 1: A code of practice for
creating accessible ICT products and services
... Originally coming from BS - Accessible web development. Now
a broader scope.
Janina: We don't want to provide conflicting guidance.
Link to ISO: https://www.iso.org/standard/70913.html
Gottfried: Will soon be balloted
as DIS.
... DIS vote could be the last chance for technical
changes.
... There is going to be an 8-week (second) CD ballot, starting
2017-05-01 at latest.
... So it is a CD vote, not a DIS vote.
... But still important since you have to comment at the
earliest stage possible.
action-2124?
<trackbot> action-2124 -- Janina Sajka to Follow up with johannes wilm on input events 1 and 2 wrt our comments on input events non-leveled -- due 2017-03-29 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2124
Janina: I think i did this, but don't recall a response from Johannes.
Michael: It seems he has replied on Mar 30.
Janina: I think we need Leonie for discussing this. Ongoing.
<MichaelC> action-2124: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2017Mar/0029.html
<trackbot> Notes added to action-2124 Follow up with johannes wilm on input events 1 and 2 wrt our comments on input events non-leveled.
action-2112?
<trackbot> action-2112 -- Janina Sajka to Re-review push api https://w3c.github.io/push-api/ -- due 2017-03-22 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/track/actions/2112
Janina: I think i need some more time on this. Need input from Web payment accessibility group. But will go ahead now and draft a comment - they can add their input later.
Michael: I believe we can skip these.
<MichaelC> Accelerometer
Michael: Low-level device stuff.
<MichaelC> Gyroscope
<MichaelC> Magnetometer
Janina: I think PF looked at this. We did not have a particular concern.
<MichaelC> Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Rules Format 1.0
Michael: I assume we don't care about this.
Janina: Anybody who wants to look at this?
Janina: I don't have any other business. Anyone?
(none)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.152 of Date: 2017/02/06 11:04:15 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s|http://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/|http://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist| Succeeded: s/alrdady/already/ Succeeded: s/30070-1/30071-1/ Default Present: Janina, Joanmarie_Diggs, MichaelC Present: Janina Joanmarie_Diggs MichaelC Regrets: John_Foliot Found Scribe: Gottfried Inferring ScribeNick: Gottfried Agenda: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-apa/2017Apr/0007.html Found Date: 12 Apr 2017 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2017/04/12-apa-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]