See also: IRC log
<scribe> New webex link https://mit.webex.com/mit/j.php?MTID=md6855d5b49f82a029c988c968aa0bf3f
<scribe> Topic : Approve last week's minutes
http://www.w3.org/2016/10/19-sdw-minutes.html
<jtandy> +1
<Linda> +0 was not there
<roba> +1
<ChrisLittle> +++1
<ClausStadler> +0 (wasn't there+
<SimonCox> jtandy: is that the webex password?
PROPOSED: Approve last week's minutes
RESOLUTION: Approve last week's minutes
sdw simon
<scribe> Topic : Patent Call
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
<scribe> Topic : New Publications promotion
<ChrisLittle> I will comment on Rob's Editor last draft for QB4ST
<jtandy> there are no comments on https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sdw-comments/
jtandy: press release ?
<roba> Chris - note I updated it with a significant revision.
eparsons: phil said w3c press release unlikely
linda: talked to geonovum comms person - dutch magazine article planned
<ChrisLittle> +1 for Linda
linda: Next months OGC meeting a good oportunity
<AndreaPerego> Post in W3C space: https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/5901
<AndreaPerego> Related tweet: https://twitter.com/w3c/status/790985514400702464
josh: geosemantics sessions planned
<AndreaPerego> My tweet: https://twitter.com/AndreaPere9o/status/791184307582828544
kerry: on w3c home page below the
fold
... Irish OS publishing linked data mentioned
eparsons: try reach usual suspects
<joshlieberman_> The feedback has not (cough) been overwhelming so far.
linda: still work in process - danger mislead people based on content so far..
ChrisLittle: will post to linkedin
eparsons: Is it clear how to comment ?
jtandy: yes it is explicit -
email link
... good time to provide feedback is the context
<scribe> Topic : Face to Face meeting planning
eparsons: phila would like to have a meeting before xmas
kerry: SSN not likely to come
from AUS !
... SSN now having weekly calls to speed up progress
<Zakim> jtandy, you wanted to propose 7, 8 or 9 Dec?
<jtandy> suggests 7, 8 or 9 and 15 or 16
<jtandy> (of Dec)
<AndreaPerego> Need to check - not sure I can make it.
Linda 15th/16th ?
Linda Just BP ?
<AndreaPerego> BTW, there's the W3C SDSVoc workshop in Amsterdam on Nov 30 - 1 Dec: https://www.w3.org/2016/11/sdsvoc/
<AndreaPerego> Is anyone going there?
<roba> suspect you could spend two days looking at examples and working out how close they are to the BP ...
jtandy: what do we want to
achieve ?
... we spend 3 hours at TPAC on issues - this was very
useful...
Linda: F2F more helpful than telecons - not though about what
eparsons: need to decide soon
jtandy: invite coverage people
kerry: Supportive of F2F as it creates focus
AndreaPerego W3C workshop of metadata could be a good option to meet also
eparsons: who could attend 15/16 dec
<Linda> +1
<ChrisLittle> +1
+1
<roba> -1
<AndreaPerego> Need to check.
<jtandy> +1
<kerry> -1 physically, probably virtually
<ClausStadler> uncertain for me
<AndreaPerego> Virtually for sure.
eparsons: I will check London locations
jtandy: Need to ping Bill tomorrow action on ed
<Linda> Geonovum meeting room is available 15th afternoon, 16th whole day
<scribe> Topic : Rob's Dimensions (Rob)
<jtandy> ACTION: eparsons to query new face to face dates with Bill Roberts (15 & 16 Dec) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2016/11/02-sdw-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-216 - Query new face to face dates with bill roberts (15 & 16 dec) [on Ed Parsons - due 2016-11-09].
<AndreaPerego> @roba, could you please post the link in the IRC?
roba: QB$ST comes from datat cube community
<AndreaPerego> Found it: http://w3c.github.io/sdw/qb4st/
roba: Data warehouse dimensions
not spatial dimensions
... Good time to review doc... is it relevant ?
... rdf data cube conformance therefore an extension
... Until Josh's vocab is ready work arounds needed
joshlieberman: Candidate BP in ogc world can be referenced
roba: Aim for Rec track
... rdf data cube not suitable to specify a crs or temporal
reference system for a specific location
<Zakim> jtandy, you wanted to check what ROb means by property
<Zakim> SimonCox, you wanted to ask roba if QB is the right basis for spatio-temporal, or maybe need a new cube which re-uses some of QB patterns?
<Zakim> jtandy, you wanted to ask where Rob sees uptake of this model; is it for people seeking to reason across data or is it just to provide machine readable metadata?
<jtandy> RobA said earlier: "qb is quite hard to use" ... limited uptake of RDF DataCube ... does the complexity outweigh the utility?
roba: answering jtandy good point
- Very general patterns become abstract - nobody uses
... adding "missing" bits of rdf datacube without
reinvention
kerry: Supports Roba's approach helpful for EO data
<kerry> bye!
<SimonCox> (Kerry's constraint is probably that some of her work was with students, and Australian academic year is February-November ... )
<AndreaPerego> Sorry, need to leave. Bye!
<jtandy> thanks! bye
bye all
<Linda> bye!