See also: IRC log
<SarahHorton> scribe: Sarah
<SarahHorton> Shawn: Originally had last Friday to set up process, ended up doing horizontal work Friday
<SarahHorton> Jeanne: Some results on survey goals
<jeanne> scribe: jeanne
<SarahHorton> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1irMybNoo-yUaUlEoo4beqIkTX7MUmyBX4b2eqZNjfR8/edit?usp=sharing
Sarah: I got a request from
Detlev Fischer for shareable links.
... so this link is publicly viewable
... I know a lot about the Discovery phase
... I split the methods into categories
... I put explanation into the methods
... we could do a stakeholder map, or inventory of
stakeholders.
... when we talk to people (including a survey) we get what
they want to tell us
... contextual interviews, you get their thoughts, but you also
get observations
... it builds in the richness of data
... Secondary research is where we look at data. We can do
interviews as part of that as well.
Shawn: We also should look at
WCAG and the process component parts
... the process of creating and maintaining WCAG for WCAG 1, 2,
and 2.1
Jeanne: We should also look at ways that people have reinterpreted WCAG
Shawn: Why and how major players (like IBM) have done that.
Sarah: We have started a
stakeholder map
... add stakeholder of "people who create adaptations of
WCAG"
... In the Interpretation phase, we turn data into insights and
communicate those insights
... how people use WCAG: Case studies (individuals); Personas
(generalized data) and User Stories (put the generalized data
into motion/work flow)
... we have to choose key themes (we can't do everything for
everyone)
... group things into categories
... communicate the results of the interpretation phase
[discussion of the idea of Design Studio-type workshop
Jeanne: We need an option that doesn't include a workshop
Sarah: OpenIDEO is a platform of
challenges
... we may do both
Jeanne: We could look at a way of forming structured discussion in the WAI-IG and WebAIM mailing lists.
Sarah: The Experimentation phase needs more buildout
Jeanne: Let's work on this now
Shawn: So from the workshop, we
would get a "wireframe-type" approach
... and in the Experimentation phase, we would turn it into a
functional prototype and then do usability testing on it.
Sarah: I nthe end, we have to be able to choose.
Shawn: The speed approach would
be to walk through it in the context of the personas, and
project the experience. That could be done in a day.
... thinking through the different levels of prototyping.
Contrast the depth and speed of going through prototypes. The
in-depth would be framework for Silver with structure and use
cases of someone trying to find information within the
structure.
... the lighter weight prototype method might be more piecemeal
so it is a part of a user story
... rather than something that resembles a final
document.
... just a few key user stories
... you can prototype an entire app with user testing, or you
can have one dialog within the application.
Jeanne: We could do presentations at confereneces and get feedback
Sarah: We can do interviews. This
is where talking with real people really matters.
... we could do interviews at conferences or phone
interviews
... possibly showing paper prototypes where people interpret
what things will do and how they will work.
Jeanne: We could do mockups where we could send out a survey broadly. That would be a low cost option.
Shawn: I am going to take this
Process Options document and edit out any of the options that
are not oriented toward UX research.
... for the Design heavy process, it makes sense to keep the
Research section. We can remove the minimal framework part for
each of the methods in Experimentation
... Structured focus groups, rather than Conference
presentations
Sarah: The Process matrix'
<SarahHorton> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1C4Wqf-g-0X_HqbJ-4euFS_U0xEISnURnilV6TJk7FQs/edit?usp=sharing
Sarah: putting that in the
minutes so people can see. We need to put in the new
Methods
... and we need to fill this matrix out more.
Jeanne: We need more methods for other processes for Ideation and Experimentation phase.
Sarah: We need to do the survey in every method, because it is necessary to bring people along.
Shawn: We need to go into more
detail on the survey -- from a general survey that is very
general
... to specific surveys for specific groups.
Jeanne: I think the analysis of
WCAG interpretations should be a component accross all the
process options. That is 8 years of people saying "WCAG doesn't
work for me, I'm going to do it THIS way".
... the process options could scope how detailed this analysis
is.
Sarah: This week, we should fill
out the Methods more. Use the What, WHy, How bullets to
describe them.
... Fill out the matrix more
Shawn: On Friday, we can use this
to break this up into separate documents.
... fill out the matrix and design methods spreadsheet, for
each of the options
... rank the impact of each of the methods
... make a copy of the process options document
... make a sketch of each one
... review each sketch in the context of the entire
process
... does it flow from start to finish within each process
... This differs from the initial timeline as finalizing the
list of goals, and then sequentially doing each process.
... what we are doing is creating all the options at the same
time and creating and refining the options in parallel.
We will all enter the Methods and Matrix information before Friday.
s/Process Options/Flesh out the Process Options document with methods
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.144 of Date: 2015/11/17 08:39:34 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/Topic: Create the first process// FAILED: s/Create the first process/Flesh out the Process Options document with methods/ Succeeded: s/Create the first process/Process Options/ Succeeded: s/Create first process/Process Options/ Found Scribe: Sarah Found Scribe: jeanne Inferring ScribeNick: jeanne Scribes: Sarah, jeanne Present: Andrew Jeanne Sarah Shawn WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 23 Aug 2016 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2016/08/23-silver-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]