ISSUE-137: Renaming is not a good idea?

sosa:sosa:hasFeatureOfInterest

Renaming is not a good idea?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Semantic Sensor Network Ontology
Raised by:
Kerry Taylor
Opened on:
2017-01-11
Description:
Note the name change --- ssn has "ssn:featureOfInterest". Also O&M also uses "featureOfInterest" which is why ssn uses it.


Nor does SOSA consistently name properties with a "has" prefix.

In the absence of a strong argument for change, it should match SSN and O&M.

And if there is such a strong argument then SSN and O&M should both change too.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
No related emails

Related notes:

As requested by Phil Archer and feedback from Japanese language translations, we do must not use the same name for Property and Class, only distinguished by capital letters.

Armin Haller, 10 Apr 2017, 06:08:16

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 137.html,v 1.1 2018/10/09 10:07:51 carine Exp $