See also: IRC log
<LJWatson> CMN: Do we need to discuss?
<LJWatson> PLH: Publication date is today.
<LJWatson> CMN: Please submit comments before the end of the month.
<LJWatson> CMN: We should be looking for bugs and tracking testing.
<LJWatson> MS: I'm working on a project that implements the new features, so will be able to do that.
<LJWatson> CMN: Proposal to meet the week of 8th - 10th July. Concern is that if people can go to this meeting or TPAC, the prefence is TPAC.
<LJWatson> CMN: Proposed agenda is ARIA on 8th, useful TF activities/tasks on 9th and 10th - agenda will be determined by those people able to attend.
<LJWatson> CMN: Agenda will be in the style of the unconf format we used in Seattle. Venues still a choice between Zaragoza and London.
<LJWatson> CMN: There will be a wiki page for this later today.
<LJWatson> CMN: With a small meeting we will need to be careful we focus, and not make decisions that need input from the wider group.
<LJWatson> CMN: I'm finding this change difficult because I don't have WebX working yet.
<LJWatson> CMN: Have requested that Liam setup a practice WebX meeting after next week's call.
<LJWatson> +1 to practice!
<LJWatson> PLH: Moving to WebX is not going to be easy. Don't remember trying to do it before the end of June.
<LJWatson> s/don't recommend/don't recommend/
<paulc> Is there a public description of the conversion from Zakim to Webex? The only info I saw was on the chairs@w3.org email archive.
<LJWatson> PLH: Chairs will need to get acclimated to WebX first.
<LJWatson> CMN: Which is a concern for me and Janina.
<LJWatson> CMN: There is a link to WebX best practices in the agenda email.
<LJWatson> CMN: Have been told that WebX chat is not screen reader accessible.
<LJWatson> CMN: We'll continue to use IRC - don't assume that sharing screens in WebX will be enough.
<chaals> Best practices for webex at W3C
<LJWatson> CMN: We won't rush to make the change, but trying a practice call would be good.
<LJWatson> CMN: Assuming Janina and I get the thing running, ask us if a practice would be helpful - if you can't make the one scheduled for next week.
<richardschwerdtfeger> Rich: Not seeing a link to the WebEx from the best practices page. Can someone put that in? I assume there is a passcode
<LJWatson> CMN: Meant to include the work statement as well as the wishlist.
<LJWatson> LW: Agreed to look at Web RTC, but question whether it's HTML?
<richardschwerdtfeger> Rich: Never mind I won’t call in
<LJWatson> PC: It's a different WG.
<LJWatson> JS: It's one for PF, Léonie you're welcome to help.
<LJWatson> LW: Sure.
<LJWatson> CMN: Panels... where is it at?
<MarkS> scribe: MarkS
LW: panel work has stalled, Brian
and I have not had a lot of time as of late
... need more working examples
... need use cases and requirements
... input from TF on that would be useful
... accordions, carousels, etc
<LJWatson> CMN: Interested in date pickers...
<LJWatson> CMN: Does it belong here or with PF, since it relates to Web Apps?
<LJWatson> PC: I wouldn't let that discourage you from doing the work.
<LJWatson> PC: Having Web Components in Web Apps is strange anyway.
<LJWatson> PLH: +1 to not stopping yourselves from getting the work done.
<plh> https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/14
<LJWatson> PLH: We're looking at the structure of work currently done in HTML and Web Apps.
<Zakim> janina, you wanted to say PF appears to be building an agenda with Web Apps
<LJWatson> JS: Works for me. The TF approach is successful, and date picker seems an appropriate thing for this TF.
<LJWatson> CMN: Shane... present web payments to TF today as the deadline. Still want to do that?
<LJWatson> SM: Yes, Web Payments isn't ready to present things yet, but after their F2F would work.
<LJWatson> CMN: Other action is mine for gathering use cases for transcript use cases.
<chaals> action-260 due 2015-06-30
<trackbot> Set action-260 Present web payments in tf meeting due date to 2015-06-30.
<chaals> action-317?
<trackbot> action-317 -- Charles McCathie Nevile to Look at the mse and spliced advertising cases in particular 05/01/2015 -- due 2015-05-14 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/317
<chaals> [Don't think there is an issue here but will extend and get it checked again]
<chaals> action-317 due in two weeks
<trackbot> Set action-317 Look at the mse and spliced advertising cases in particular 05/01/2015 due date to 2015-05-14.
<LJWatson> CMN: AOB?
<LJWatson> LQ: ALt doc should be published next TUesday.
<LJWatson> JB: We're expecting a new charter to be with W3M within the next week or so, and to be with the AC after that.
<LJWatson> JB: We expect the current charter to be extended to cover the review period.
<LJWatson> JB: Happy to answer questions to the extent I can...
<LJWatson> SM: Will PF have to stop publishing?
<LJWatson> JB: There will be an announcement next week, but no.
<LJWatson> cakim, list participants
bye all!
<chaals> [thanks to Léonie for scribing]
<chaals> [thanks to MarkS for supplementary scribing]
<LJWatson> scribe: LJWatson
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.140 of Date: 2014-11-06 18:16:30 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/End date/Publication date/ FAILED: s/don't remember/don't recommend/ Succeeded: s/remember/recommend/ Found Scribe: MarkS Inferring ScribeNick: MarkS Found Scribe: LJWatson Inferring ScribeNick: LJWatson Scribes: MarkS, LJWatson ScribeNicks: MarkS, LJWatson Default Present: janina, Chaals, Léonie, paulc, Plh, Joanmarie_Diggs, Adrian_Roselli, +1.617.319.aaaa, MarkS, IanPouncey1, ShaneM, Liam, Judy Present: janina Chaals Léonie paulc Plh Joanmarie_Diggs Adrian_Roselli +1.617.319.aaaa MarkS IanPouncey1 ShaneM Liam Judy Got date from IRC log name: 14 May 2015 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2015/05/14-html-a11y-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]