ISSUE-198: rdf:langString not included in datatypes
rdf:langString
rdf:langString not included in datatypes
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SHACL Spec
- Raised by:
- Karen Coyle
- Opened on:
- 2016-11-17
- Description:
- From email of 31 October 2016:[2]
>> *Karen*
>> This checks the ^^xsd:X literals. sh:nodeKind checks for IRI, bnode,
>> or literal. There's one more type in RDF 1.1 [1] which is the
>> "language-tagged string". We have sh:uniqueLang and sh:languageIn, but
>> is there also a need to check that a literal is language-tagged?
> *Holger*
> Being language-tagged is already checked via sh:datatype rdf:langString.
> So I think that's handled OK.
OK, but the terminology entry for "datatype" cites RDF 1.1 concepts, and
rdf:langString doesn't appear in that document. It is defined in RDF
Schema 1.1, though.[1] Does that mean it should be listed specifically
with RDFS as its reference?
kc
[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-schema-20140225/#ch_langstring
[2]https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Nov/0001.html
***Proposal***
Modify definition of datatypes in SHACL to include rdf:langString from RDF schema. Also, is rdfs:Literal also needed? - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-12-09)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from andy.seaborne@topquadrant.com on 2016-12-09)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-11-30)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-30)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-11-30)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-22)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-21)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-20)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-11-19)
- Re: shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-11-18)
- shapes-ISSUE-198 (rdf:langString): rdf:langString not included in datatypes [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-11-17)
Related notes:
RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-198 as addressed by https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Nov/0083.html and https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Nov/0094.html, changing "implies" to "means" in the reference to rdf:langString
See https://www.w3.org/2016/11/30-shapes-minutes.html#resolution03
Display change log