ISSUE-134: does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints

knowing inverse

does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SHACL Spec
Raised by:
Peter Patel-Schneider
Opened on:
2016-03-10
Description:
From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-data-shapes-wg/2016Mar/0106.html

Some constraint types require different SPARQL queries (or JavaScript or whatever) depending on the direction of a property (or even worse, for an arbitrary path). For example sh:minCount needs to count subjects versus objects.

Is it possible to determine whether a sh:minCount constraint is an inverse or not? Consider

ex:s a sh:Shape ;
sh:property _:c ;
sh:inverseProperty _:c .
_:c [ sh:predicate ex:p ;
sh:minCount 5 ] .
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Proposal to close ISSUE-134 (Does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints)_ (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-07-27)
  2. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-09)
  3. Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (from irene@topquadrant.com on 2016-05-07)
  4. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-05-07)
  5. Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-05-07)
  6. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-05-07)
  7. Re: ISSUE-110: Can we close this? (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-05-07)
  8. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-22)
  9. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-21)
  10. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-21)
  11. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-11)
  12. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-11)
  13. valid and invalid shapes (ISSUE-134) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-11)
  14. Re: fundamental problems with SHACL (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-11)
  15. Re: fundamental problems with SHACL (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-08)
  16. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-08)
  17. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-08)
  18. Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-08)
  19. Re: fundamental problems with SHACL (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-08)
  20. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-04-07)
  21. the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-07)
  22. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-07)
  23. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-04-07)
  24. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-07)
  25. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-07)
  26. Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 7 April 2016 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-07)
  27. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-07)
  28. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-04-06)
  29. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from kcoyle@kcoyle.net on 2016-04-06)
  30. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-06)
  31. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-04-06)
  32. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-06)
  33. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2016-04-06)
  34. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-04-06)
  35. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  36. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  37. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  38. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  39. Re: Selected problems with Proposal 4 (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  40. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from holger@topquadrant.com on 2016-03-11)
  41. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  42. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  43. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  44. Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2016-03-10)
  45. shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-03-10)

Related notes:

RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-134 as no longer relevant
See https://www.w3.org/2016/07/28-shapes-minutes.html#resolution03

Arnaud Le Hors, 29 Jul 2016, 16:25:00

Display change log ATOM feed


Ted Thibodeau <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>, Chairs, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $