See also: IRC log
http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
close action-251
<trackbot> Closed action-251.
action-252?
<trackbot> action-252 -- Felix Sasaki to Ping dita folks about contacting html5 about ruby progress -- due 2013-09-05 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/252
action-312?
<trackbot> action-312 -- Richard Ishida to Talk to dom about adding status tracking stuff to tracker for encoding last call purposes -- due 2014-06-12 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/312
richard: talk to sysreq
instead
... probably won't happen soon
... just make do?
close action-312
<trackbot> Closed action-312.
felix: add item to agenda at the end
http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Review_radar#Scheduled_Last_Call_reviews
JcK: discussion on W3C/IETF
call
... on getting URN unstuck
... still stuck
... librarians want URN features that can't be currently
supported
... have long term view
... similarly WHATWG/W3C changes to URL
... is inconsistent with generic URI syntax
... concern is whether we end up with a bunch of forked
standards
... or define relationship of these two specs to generic
URI
... go ahead and separate URN
... and move URL to W3C (??)
... and do something to URI 3986
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Jun/0008.html
<r12a> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2014Jun/0006.html
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/repository/html5/the-dir-attribute/results-dir-isolation
richard: put together tests
... to see if elements are isolating
... and element is treated as a neutral
... basically all items are red
... there are like 12 tests per box
... and only one or two per fail
... dir isolation is not default on any browser yet
... not a surprise
... second table with shim
... we get better results
... FF has 2 fails
... Safari has one
... only small issues
... IE doesn't use CSS necessary for shim
... want you to look at tests
... are they valid?
... give feedback?
... I think they are pretty valid
... like to hear any comments
matial: had a look at the
tests
... are those tests inspired from aharon's tests?
... those were from work group in Jerusalem
... look similar
... may not be same?
... reviewed then and were appropriate
richard: took the bdi tests
... worked from them
... made some changes
... most of aharon tests had six subtests
... also put in tests for dir=auto
... and dir=ltr and rtl
... made one or two other changes
matial: looking at what was
tested
... source code hard to decipher
... couldn't find words i the tests
... what was tested wasn't obvious in the test
... useful to add to page pseudo code to page
... so it's apparent what is tested
... would be interesting to read to know
richard: when you go to a link
like above
... that's to the framework
... actual test is in an iframe
... gray rectangle is limit of iframe
... you have to right click in the frame
... and view that source
matial: on page with list of
tests
... last line is list of browsers
richard: "score" is your current
browser
... when you click on score
... buttons for scoring
... and it'll move through tests
... after you go through several times
... "show results" will generate the code to mail to
richard
... to merge with existing info in the tables
matial: mail you remarks
... ?
richard: if you want to run on
particular platform
... the show result box would show you what you've
entered
... that's for *running* the tests
... but not for reviewing them
... please send me email to review them
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2014AprJun/0203.html
addison: need to publish
files
... want to keep links for now to whatwg
... need to do when we move to CR
... keep from forking until we actually publish CR
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/7
issue-335?
<trackbot> issue-335 -- health warnings for when language not known -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/335
issue-355?
<trackbot> issue-355 -- Supporting files referenced rather than copied -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/355
reviewed this item
richard: been talking to martin
about his tests
... he's not using the exact template for TTWF
... just be aware
addison: coverage map?
richard: hope to open it up
shortly
... similar problem to dir tests
... you get a pass/fail for each byte
addison: preparing document for publication
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat/#Property:catalog_language
felix: already a recommendation
addison: should at least point to
IANA registry, since that is stable
... but better to have BCP47
<scribe> ACTION: felix: contact DCAT folks about catalog_language [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/06/12-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-313 - Contact dcat folks about catalog_language [on Felix Sasaki - due 2014-06-19].
richard: started working on ruby
tests
... look out for them soon