See also: IRC log
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
close ACTION-100
<trackbot> ACTION-100 Respond to Sam and also ping Hixie about what we're doing about ruby, noting that we need more time to reach consensus closed
<DavidClarke> sorry... must opt out...
close ACTION-105
<trackbot> ACTION-105 Move this call to 1500 UTC beginning next week (21 April) closed
thanks to dave for running the poll
richard: remind us all that if your AC Rep changes, then important for the organizaiton to send email to ac-update@w3.org list to notify the W3C
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2012Mar/0006.html
richard: need to register by 30 April if our group is to meet
addison: I will fill in survey form; ask for phone
richard: had final MLWeb project
"heritage project"
scribe: in LUX last week, 130
attendees
... went well
... everyone very happy
<fsasaki> yay!
scribe: had some good
presentations
... including Joomla, wikimedia, MSFT
richard: spoke to some mozilla
folks about ruby
... may have some support there
... looking at possibility of having more
... felix's WG/project will run project events
... and may do something similar
... perhaps in about a year?
... seems to be keen on/have interest
felix: co-chair MLWeb LT WG
... and W3C Fellow
... thanks richard for building up the community
<r12a> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/tags/mlwlux/
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/community/mws/
richard: community group set
up
... photos are impressive
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/2011/12/mlw-lt-charter
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/2012/03/21-swcg-minutes.html#item01
<fsasaki> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-semweb-cg/2012Mar/0022.html
felix: RDF1.1 moving forward. XML
Literal datatype to be dropped? adding HTML Literal
... so metadata same as html5
... of interest to this WG
<fsasaki> https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=53116&public=1
richard: receive a lot of
attention during workshop
... tony graham talking about a community group to promote
developing requirements for typography similar to JLReq
<r12a> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/encoding/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
richard: in domain meeting
yesterday, need to get some decision on...
... is this something that should be done and where
... also contact unicode folks
... get opinion on how useful
... put a "ring around" full list of encodings
... and encourage only utf-8
addison: nothing about detection, only about the label
norbert: how did he pick list?
richard: looked at what browsers support, perhaps?
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/25
addison: I would add one comment about charmod ref
<scribe> ACTION: addison: inform Unicode of the Encoding document effort [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/21-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-106 - Inform Unicode of the Encoding document effort [on Addison Phillips - due 2012-03-28].
<scribe> ACTION: addison: inform group of need to submit comments on encoding document by 4 April [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2012/03/21-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-107 - Inform group of need to submit comments on encoding document by 4 April [on Addison Phillips - due 2012-03-28].
norbert: who should be
responsible and publish this document?
... can't see as REC??
addison: this would be good as part of charmod
richard: IETF might set up a WG
felix: would it be easier to charter a group?