ISSUE-98: Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir

Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Global Considerations
Raised by:
Opened on:
2011-11-01
Description:
Related Actions Items:
Related emails:
  1. RE: Relevance of Current Law (ISSUE-98) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-26)
  2. diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
  3. [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15)
  4. [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15)
  5. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28)
  6. RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2011-11-28)
  7. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28)
  8. ISSUE-98: Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-01)

Related notes:

In the Global considerations meeting in Berlin, it became clear that we will consider applicable laws. So this issue is closed:
http://www.w3.org/2013/03/12-dnt-minutes.html#action03

Rigo Wenning, 21 Mar 2013, 09:44:50

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 98.html,v 1.1 2019/02/01 09:32:48 vivien Exp $