ISSUE-98: Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir
Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Global Considerations
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2011-11-01
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
ACTION-108 on Jonathan Mayer to Draft text for issue-98 - due 2012-02-02, closed- Related emails:
- RE: Relevance of Current Law (ISSUE-98) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-26)
- diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
- [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15)
- [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15)
- Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28)
- RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2011-11-28)
- Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28)
- ISSUE-98: Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-01)
Related notes:
In the Global considerations meeting in Berlin, it became clear that we will consider applicable laws. So this issue is closed:
http://www.w3.org/2013/03/12-dnt-minutes.html#action03
Display change log