Edit ISSUE-98: Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir

Nickname:

Title:

State:

Product:

Raised By:

Description:

Add notes (no markup allowed, URIs get automatically hyperlinked):

Related emails:

  1. RE: Relevance of Current Law (ISSUE-98) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-26) (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-01-26)
  2. diff of TPE editing since the FPWD (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-01-10)
  3. [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15)
  4. [Issue-98] Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-12-15)
  5. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28)
  6. RE: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2011-11-28) (from vp@iabeurope.eu on 2011-11-28)
  7. Re: Summary of First Party vs. Third Party Tests (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28) (from rob@blaeu.com on 2011-11-28)
  8. ISSUE-98: Should we consider applicable laws and regulations, such as the Article 5, paragraph 3 ePriv Dir (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-01) (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-01)

Related notes:

In the Global considerations meeting in Berlin, it became clear that we will consider applicable laws. So this issue is closed:
http://www.w3.org/2013/03/12-dnt-minutes.html#action03

Rigo Wenning, 21 Mar 2013, 09:44:50


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $