ISSUE-228: Revise the Network Interaction definition

Network Interaction

Revise the Network Interaction definition

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)
Raised by:
Jack Hobaugh
Opened on:
2013-10-02
Description:
This issue is raised on behalf of NAI, IAB, and DMA.

Change proposal regarding providing examples of user actions: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Revise_network_interaction_definition
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Batch closing of obsolete issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-06-03)
  2. ISSUE-217, ISSUE-228: Network Transaction definition --- Decision on Call for Objections (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-02-05)
  3. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014, ISSUE-25 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-01-29)
  4. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014, ISSUE-25 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-01-29)
  5. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-01-29)
  6. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014 (from kathy@esomar.org on 2014-01-29)
  7. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2014-01-29)
  8. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014 (from sid@mozilla.com on 2014-01-28)
  9. Re: Agenda for January 29, 2014 (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-01-28)
  10. Agenda for January 29, 2014 (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-01-28)
  11. Re: [Call for objections] Network interaction (from ninja@w3.org on 2013-12-03)
  12. Re: [Call for objections] Network interaction (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-12-03)
  13. RE: [Call for objections] Network interaction (from bs3131@att.com on 2013-12-03)
  14. [Call for objections] Network interaction (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-12-02)
  15. RE: Revise network interaction definition issue-217 issue-228 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-11-25)
  16. Re: Revise network interaction definition issue-217 issue-228 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-11-25)
  17. Revise network interaction definition issue-217 issue-228 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-11-24)
  18. issue-228 minor point (from singer@apple.com on 2013-11-13)
  19. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from singer@apple.com on 2013-11-01)
  20. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2013-10-31)
  21. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from tien@eff.org on 2013-10-31)
  22. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2013-10-31)
  23. RE: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2013-10-31)
  24. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-31)
  25. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from singer@apple.com on 2013-10-31)
  26. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from tien@eff.org on 2013-10-30)
  27. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2013-10-30)
  28. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from Brooks.Dobbs@kbmg.com on 2013-10-30)
  29. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-10-30)
  30. Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2013-10-30)
  31. RE: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-10-30)
  32. Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2013-10-30)
  33. Re: Additional documentation for Issue-228 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-10-19)
  34. Additional documentation for Issue-228 (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2013-10-16)
  35. Re: tracking-ISSUE-228 (Network Interaction): Revise the Network Interaction definition [Compliance Current] (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-10-02)
  36. tracking-ISSUE-228 (Network Interaction): Revise the Network Interaction definition [Compliance Current] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-02)

Related notes:

[rigo]: Decision to consolidate the ISSUE-228 into ISSUE-217

6 Nov 2013, 18:16:12

This definition was determined to be the least objectionable (http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/CfO_rationales/Network_interaction_decision.pdf):
“A network interaction is a single HTTP request and its corresponding response(s): zero or more interim (1xx) responses and a single final (2xx-5xx) response.
A user action is a deliberate action by the user, via configuration, invocation, or selection, to initiate a network interaction. Selection of a link, submission of a form, and reloading a page are examples of user actions.
A subrequest is any network interaction that is not directly initiated by user action. For example, an initial response in a hypermedia format that contains embedded references to stylesheets, images, frame sources, and onload actions will cause a browser, depending on its capabilities and configuration, to perform a corresponding set of automated subrequests to fetch those references using additional network interactions.”

Ninja Marnau, 11 Mar 2014, 21:18:35

Text from CfO decision added to TPE in r1.243

Roy Fielding, 13 Mar 2014, 07:29:30

As we are approaching Last Call with the TPE spec

Ninja Marnau, 9 Apr 2014, 15:23:27

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.326 2018/10/13 17:29:51 vivien Exp $