ISSUE-142: How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks?
How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Compliance Next
- Raised by:
- David Singer
- Opened on:
- 2012-04-25
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from singer@apple.com on 2013-07-02)
- Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-07-02)
- Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from singer@apple.com on 2013-07-01)
- Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from david@appnexus.com on 2013-07-01)
- Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
- issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
- Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
- Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
- Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-10-26)
- Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-10-25)
- RE: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from Vincent.Toubiana@alcatel-lucent.com on 2012-10-25)
- Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-10-24)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-10)
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from bs3131@att.com on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-05-10)
- RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from Vincent.Toubiana@alcatel-lucent.com on 2012-05-10)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-05-09)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-09)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-05-09)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-09)
- agenda 9 May 2012 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-05-09)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-05-04)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-03)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-05-02)
- Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-02)
- Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-02)
- ISSUE-142: How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-25)
Related notes:
see thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Feb/0526.html
Looks like an almost-duplicate of ISSUE-174?
Thomas Roessler, 10 Nov 2012, 17:46:20Merged into ISSUE-134: Would we additionally permit logs that are retained for a short enough period?
Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 01:09:42Display change log