ISSUE-142: How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks?

How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Compliance Next
Raised by:
David Singer
Opened on:
2012-04-25
Description:
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from singer@apple.com on 2013-07-02)
  2. Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from dwainberg@appnexus.com on 2013-07-02)
  3. Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from singer@apple.com on 2013-07-01)
  4. Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads (from david@appnexus.com on 2013-07-01)
  5. Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
  6. issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
  7. Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
  8. Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
  9. Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de on 2012-10-26)
  10. Re: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-10-25)
  11. RE: Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from Vincent.Toubiana@alcatel-lucent.com on 2012-10-25)
  12. Retention with grace period (ACTION-266) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-10-24)
  13. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-05-10)
  14. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-10)
  15. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-10)
  16. RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from bs3131@att.com on 2012-05-10)
  17. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-05-10)
  18. RE: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from Vincent.Toubiana@alcatel-lucent.com on 2012-05-10)
  19. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-05-09)
  20. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-09)
  21. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-05-09)
  22. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-09)
  23. agenda 9 May 2012 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-05-09)
  24. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from rigo@w3.org on 2012-05-04)
  25. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-03)
  26. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2012-05-02)
  27. Re: Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-02)
  28. Allowed uses of protocol data in first N weeks (ACTION-190) (from ifette@google.com on 2012-05-02)
  29. ISSUE-142: How should protocol data be allowed to be used in the first N weeks? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-25)

Related notes:

see thread at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2012Feb/0526.html

David Singer, 25 Apr 2012, 19:22:50

Looks like an almost-duplicate of ISSUE-174?

Thomas Roessler, 10 Nov 2012, 17:46:20

Merged into ISSUE-134: Would we additionally permit logs that are retained for a short enough period?

Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 01:09:42

Display change log ATOM feed


Matthias Schunter <matthias.schunter@intel.com>, Chair, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: index.php,v 1.325 2014-09-10 21:42:02 ted Exp $