ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDF Concepts
- Raised by:
- Guus Schreiber
- Opened on:
- 2013-10-08
- Description:
- Comment by Jeremy Carroll:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Jul/0022.html
This is a formal comment on RDF Concepts 1.1
I am concerned that the resolution of issue 38 leaves a disconnect.
In particular, I think it is common practice to have datasets
<g1> {
<g1> rdf:type owl:Ontology
}
<g2> {
<g2> rdf:type owl:Ontology ;
owl:imports <g1> .
}
and this practice is somewhat undermined by the resolution of issue-38 which leaves a disconnect (^sd:name sd:graph) between the name and the graph. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-14)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-14)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from jjc@syapse.com on 2013-10-14)
- Re: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (ISSUE-151) (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-11)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-10)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-10-10)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from phayes@ihmc.us on 2013-10-09)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
- Re: status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from sandro@w3.org on 2013-10-09)
- status of Jeremy's main comments (ISSUE-142 and ISSUE-151) and two proposed responses (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-09)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from pfpschneider@gmail.com on 2013-10-08)
- Re: proposed response to Jeremy's comment on owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2013-10-08)
- RDF-ISSUE-151: LC comment: owl:imports and graph names and issue 38 [RDF Concepts] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-10-08)
Related notes:
WG response accepted by the commenter:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Oct/0042.html
Display change log