ISSUE-367: prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear

hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear

prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Ontology

Raised by:

Stephan Zednik

Opened on:

2012-04-26

Description:

1) There are two domains defined for prov:hadActivity

- prov:Involvement
- the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility

from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_domain

Where a property P has more than one rdfs:domain property, then the resources denoted by subjects of triples with predicate P are instances of all the classes stated by the rdfs:domain properties.

From what I can tell this means the domain is the intersection of prov:Involvement with the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility, which is just the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility since both are subclasses of prov:Involvement.


2) annotations on prov:hadActivity

- it appears that the domain has been relaxed to be a union of Derivation and Responsibility, so I think we can remove the prov:todo annotation

- The rdfs:comment is currently "The activity generating the the derived entity and using the derived-from entity". I think this should be updated to reflect the relaxed domain. What does it mean when a qualified Responsibility hadActivity?

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-04-26)
2. [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-26)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-26)
4. PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-26)

Related notes:

Display change log