- From: Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:11:14 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
PROV-ISSUE-367 (hadActivity-domain-and-comments-unclear): prov:hadActivity domain and usage unclear [Ontology] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/367 Raised by: Stephan Zednik On product: Ontology 1) There are two domains defined for prov:hadActivity - prov:Involvement - the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility from http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_domain Where a property P has more than one rdfs:domain property, then the resources denoted by subjects of triples with predicate P are instances of all the classes stated by the rdfs:domain properties. >From what I can tell this means the domain is the intersection of prov:Involvement with the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility, which is just the union of prov:Derivation and prov:Responsibility since both are subclasses of prov:Involvement. 2) annotations on prov:hadActivity - it appears that the domain has been relaxed to be a union of Derivation and Responsibility, so I think we can remove the prov:todo annotation - The rdfs:comment is currently "The activity generating the the derived entity and using the derived-from entity". I think this should be updated to reflect the relaxed domain. What does it mean when a qualified Responsibility hadActivity?
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 04:11:17 UTC