ISSUE-260: In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions.

TLebo

In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions.

State:
CLOSED
Product:
prov-dm
Raised by:
Timothy Lebo
Opened on:
2012-02-22
Description:
Please add a note to section Note to encourage people to use Account / AccountEntity/ Provenance to annotate provenance assertions as a better practice. When using AccountEntity, the annotated thing can be described _directly_ as a single triple instead of using Notes. Notes are very much "scruffy provenance" and do not benefit from the directness afforded by AccountEntity / prov:Provenance.

:prov_1 {
:simon a prov:Human;
prov:hasAnnotation [
a prov:Note; ex3:reputation "excellent";
rdfs:comment "This is a kludge way to get indirection. Use prov:Provenance instead.";
];
}

:prov_2 {
:simon ex3:reputation "excellent" .
}

:prov_1 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :first_asserter .
:prov_2 a prov:Provenance; prov:wasAttributedTo :trust_evaluator_agent.

Thanks,
Tim
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-09-04)
  2. Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-15)
  3. Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-14)
  4. Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-06-14)
  5. Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-14)
  6. Re: ISSUE-385: hasProvenanceIn: finding a solution (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-06-14)
  7. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
  8. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
  9. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
  10. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-18)
  11. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
  12. Re: provenance of provenance (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-05-17)
  13. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
  14. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
  15. Re: provenance of provenance (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-05-17)
  16. Re: provenance of provenance (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-05-16)
  17. Re: provenance of provenance (from jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-05-16)
  18. Re: provenance of provenance (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-16)
  19. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-16)
  20. Re: provenance of provenance (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-15)
  21. Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-15)
  22. Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-15)
  23. Re: provenance of provenance (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-05-15)
  24. RE: provenance of provenance (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-05-14)
  25. Re: provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-12)
  26. Re: provenance of provenance (from kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de on 2012-05-12)
  27. Re: provenance of provenance (from reza.bfar@oracle.com on 2012-05-11)
  28. Re: provenance of provenance (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-11)
  29. Re: provenance of provenance (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-05-11)
  30. provenance of provenance (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-10)
  31. Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-03-29)
  32. Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-28)
  33. Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-03-25)
  34. Re: PROV-DM (DM4) - review up to section 4.2.3.3 (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-23)
  35. Re: PROV-ISSUE-239 (TLebo): is wasGeneratedBy(e) meaningful? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
  36. Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
  37. Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-03)
  38. Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-24)
  39. Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-24)
  40. Re: PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-22)
  41. PROV-ISSUE-260 (TLebo): In Note section: cite prov:Provenance as better practice to annotate assertions. [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-22)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 260.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:31 vivien Exp $